Bail Submissions
IN THE FIRST MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No. 1377 of 2025
IN THE MATTER of an application by the Applicant pursuant to Section 3 and 30 of the Bail Act 2002
BETWEEN:
VARINAVA SABUA - APPLICANT
THE STATE - RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY
To Affidavit of Detective Constable 3056 Jolei Luveitasau sworn on 3rd December 2025
Overview:
Varinava Sabua, the Applicant, is a Police Officer currently detained at Suva Remand Centre.
This affidavit supports the Applicant's application for bail dated 21st November 2025.
1. Personal Knowledge
Varinava Sabua provides this affidavit based on personal knowledge, unless otherwise stated.
2. Reliance on Previous Affidavit
The Applicant reaffirms reliance on the contents of his previous affidavit dated 21st November 2025.
3. Response to Detective Constable's Affidavit
Paragraphs [1] to [4]: Not applicable; outside of personal knowledge.
Paragraphs [5]: No response due to lack of knowledge of the investigation.
Paragraphs [6] and [7]: Confirms arrest and interview at CID HQ, emphasizes cooperation with the police during the investigation.
4. Critique of Opposition Affidavit
Claims that the Detective Constable's affidavit cherry-picks issues without considering the overall context of the application for bail, not accurately representing the special facts and new circumstances.
5. Confirmation of Special Facts and New Circumstances
Paragraph [8]: Confirms the relevance of content in his Affidavit dated 21st November 2025.
Special Circumstances Cited:
Medical Condition:
Prior Counsel failed to highlight severe medical condition (swollen feet) resulting in ongoing treatment and complications.
Comprehensive medical evidence not previously submitted before the Court.
Financial Responsibility:
Sole breadwinner for immediate family (elderly mother, two brothers) who are financially dependent.
If remanded, they would face financial hardship.
Medical Debts:
Accumulated significant debts due to medical bills; payments halted while in remand, leading to financial strain on family.
Loan Debt:
Owes $54,000 to Konitiki Finance with fortnightly payments of $284; unable to meet these payments while in remand, risking legal action for non-payment.
Change in Circumstance:
Initially denied bail due to being a suspect in another investigation; has not been charged, indicating a significant change that favors bail.
6. Medical Explanation
Paragraph [10]: Emphasizes ongoing serious medical condition (Acute Cholecystitis) treated with surgery early in 2025.
Surgical Procedure:
Underwent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy alongside Laparoscopic Intra Operative Angiogram.
Post-Surgical Impact:
Left with lifelong complications that are worse in remand.
Experiences recurrent abdominal pain and gastrointestinal issues; compromised immunity increases infection risk in remand conditions.
7. Health Risks in Remand Settings
Response to Paragraph [11]: Relies on reports showing health risks (HIV/AIDS outbreaks, overcrowding) in corrections facilities.
Cites multiple articles confirming the existence of serious health risks due to overcrowded conditions.
Advocates that pre-existing conditions put him at greater risk of contracting diseases in the remand center.
8. Legal Considerations
Response to Paragraphs [16] and [17-19]:
Denies allegations without evidence.
Affirms understanding of witness engagement rules as a police officer.
Claims concerns can be addressed through strict bail conditions.
9. Summary of Arguments
Emphasizes that issues raised in opposition do not offset the presumption of bail in his favor.
Asserts willingness to abide by any bail conditions laid out by the Court.
10. Request for Relief
The Applicant prays for the Court’s indulgence in granting orders for bail based on presented circumstances.
Sworn by VARINAVA SABUA
Date: [Specifically Day, Month Year]
Prior to me: [Commissioner of Oaths]