lecture
what is Redcrosse?
a liturgy: a form of public worship
draws from religious, (Church of England Christian), political, (Liberal/left-leaning post-colonial), poetic, (Edmund Spenser’s The Faery Queene, The Book of Common Prayer), symbolic/environmental (Earth, Air, Water, Fire) sources
written n performed 2011
aim: to create an English solidarity, that would translate universally
4 propositions
1. meaning is not contained in objects - it is always constructed
no inherent meaning
tools of construction:
symbols
imagery
context
local, global, personal history
performance
intertextuality
experience
2. language has transformative power - when accompanied by practical application (ritual) and recognised by social bodies (empowered)
examples of ritual and performance:
remembrance day
poppy wreaths
flying of the flag
3. representation, accessibility, relatability - whose story is being told and how?
eg:
art of Saint George and the Dragon
important to critique representation
relies on subjective reaction
why is it important to feel represented?
4. Reading something relies on imagination » multiple interlocking perspectives and methods of reading and analysis
subject position:
literally where you are: reader, viewer, participant, leader?
the formal position: as an essay/text, repeating/performing, writer?
surface reading/contextual depth or examining the interrelations between the surface and the depth?
imagination: linked to sympathy, empathy, understanding
3 ways into Redcrosse
text as ritual and performance
the binaries set up within the text
the symbolic possibilities and limitations of the text
ritual
liturgy = meant to be performed, in a particular way
single speaker vs congregation
chance for participants to ask questions/investigate & express individuality?
does participation change anything?
binaries
experience and imagination
surface and depth
specific and abstract
symbols
Redcrosse & the 4 propositions
meaning is not contained in objects » the meaning of Redcrosse is not fixed; depends upon interpretation
language has transformative power » the ritual of the liturgy here is designed to transform individuals into a collective who are tasked with ‘questing’ for new ways of imagining ‘England’ and questioning how England is imagined today
representation, accessibility, relatability » the language of the text is ‘universal’ and specifically Christian, reveals the wider contradictions of a National religion that is not representative
reading something relies on imagination » imagery, metaphor and sensual engagement in the creation of a ‘God’ that is being addressed