9 Civil Rights Legislation and Voting Rights
Civil Rights Legislation Overview
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Major legislation aimed at ending discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Key sections:
Title VII: Outlaws discrimination in employment.
Prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements.
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Passed shortly after the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Focuses on ensuring equal voting rights, particularly for African Americans.
Federalism in Voting:
States and local governments set election laws (i.e., polling hours, voter registration deadlines).
The Voting Rights Act employs federal power to enforce voting rights.
Major Provisions of the Voting Rights Act
Federal Oversight of Local Elections:
Federal government can replace local voting registrars where discrimination occurred.
Aimed at areas historically marked by discrimination.
Ensures fair voting practices.
Federal Approval for Changes:
States and local governments must receive federal approval before making changes to voting laws in historically discriminatory areas.
This is to prevent new discriminatory practices from being implemented.
Suspension of Literacy Tests
Literacy tests used to control voter registration were suspended under the Voting Rights Act if their application had racial discriminatory purposes.
The act did not declare literacy tests unconstitutional when neutral; it merely suspended their use if discriminatory.
Bipartisan Support and Evolution of the Voting Rights Act
Initial Bipartisan Support:
The Voting Rights Act had bipartisan support upon its passage and during early renewals.
Renewals occurred periodically, with notable examples:
2006 reauthorization signed by President Bush, indicating ongoing bipartisan support.
Shift Post-2006:
Bipartisan support began to decline.
Supreme Court decisions began to weaken the enforcement mechanisms established by the Act, leading to debates in Congress about its future.
By the 2010s, many provisions were no longer effective or enforced.
Poll Taxes
Poll taxes were used to restrict African American voting rights.
The 24th Amendment (ratified in 1964) eliminated poll taxes in federal elections, affirming that no payment should be required to vote.
School Segregation and Desegregation
Historical Context:
Following the Brown v. Board of Education case, desegregation efforts faced resistance, particularly in Northern and Southern school districts due to neighborhood segregation.
Swan v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971):
Supreme Court upheld the legality of busing students to desegregate schools.
This decision impacted millions of students and demonstrated the judiciary's role in enforcing desegregation.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Title VII prohibits discrimination in employment based on:
Race
Color
Sex
Religion
National origin
Applies to both public and private employers with at least 15 employees.
Excludes smaller businesses (e.g., family-run businesses) from its jurisdiction.
Equal Employment Opportunity Regulations
Federal law sets minimum protection standards.
Businesses may choose to extend protections to additional groups, including age, disability, sexual orientation, etc.
Legal Standards for Discrimination Cases
Courts apply various scrutiny levels in discrimination cases:
Strict Scrutiny:
Applies to laws concerning suspect classifications (race, color, fundamental rights).
Burden of proof lies with the government to justify the law as necessary.
Intermediate Scrutiny:
Established through Craig v. Boren (1976).
Applies to sex-based laws; laws must serve important governmental objectives and be substantially related to achieving those objectives.
Rational Basis:
General standard for most discrimination cases not involving suspect or quasi-suspect classifications.
The burden of proof is on the individual challenging the law.
Notable Cases in Discrimination Law Development
Reed v. Reed (1971):
Idaho law preferring males over females for executor roles in wills deemed unconstitutional for being arbitrary and discriminatory.
The Court underscored the importance of equal protection under the law without arbitrary distinctions.
Craig v. Boren (1976):
Gender-based discriminatory law concerning alcohol purchasing age led to the establishment of intermediate scrutiny standards for sex discrimination cases.
Implications of Scrutiny Levels
The classification into different scrutiny levels shapes how cases are judged and the protections afforded to various groups.
The ongoing evolution and debate illustrate civil rights as a dynamic and continuously contested space, impacting laws, policies, and individual rights across the governance spectrum.
Conclusion
Current discussions regarding civil rights legislation, especially around voting rights and employment discrimination, continue to evolve within the broader context of American political and social life.