Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Histories
Part 1—Contexts
Chapter 1—Shakespearean History Play (3)
Genre (3)
Histories associated w/ tragedies since both end w/ death
Bradley’s distinction b/t historical, pure tragedy
Henry V ends w/ marriage, like comedy
Aristotle contrasted history w/ poetry
History emerges from politics
English drama pre-1500s was almost entirely ceremonial+religious
Mysteries (biblical dramatizations), miracles (saint biographies)
Allegorical morality plays instill Christian doctrines
Characteristics of Shakespeare’s histories
Expectation of some knowledge of historical events
Truth+Realism (11)
Shakespeare addresses history+historiography
Places represent social spaces, not geographical locations
Shakespeare concerned w/ institutions, esp. court politics
Politics (14)
Shakespeare’s histories related to history by offering representations of historical figures+creation of theater out of historical events
Shakespeare’s histories address historical process
Historiography (16)
Shakespeare doesn’t separate dramatization from commentary
Reflections on, not of, past
Shakespeare most interested in causation
Earlier writers assumed events were divine providence rather than consequence of actions
“History is made by the decisions and actions of men and women taken at particular times and in particular circumstances” (18)
Supernatural acts primarily as storytelling devices
‘Edification’ (20)
Shakespeare’s histories as theatrical essays on political ‘edification’
Chapter 5—Women’s Roles in Elizabethan History Plays (71)
Margaret
Margaret subject of earliest surviving reference to Shakespearean character+Shakespeare’s work
Margaret only character it appear in all 4 plays of 1st tetralogy
Joan
Most formidable opponent confronted by English forces
Most memorable+vividly conceived of all characters in play
Margaret enters play as Joan leaves, symbolizing role shift
English history play least hospitable to women
2nd tetralogy severely limits roles of women
Theme of women as antagonists/negative characterization
Level of agency directly related to negativity of characterization
Less feminine qualities associated with uniquely female wickedness
Strong women unwomanly
Women antagonistic to purpose of plays (preservation of historic past)
Joan traditional antagonist
Margaret anti-hero to antagonist
Character doomed from start by consequences of marriage
Part 2—Plays (87)
Chapter 6—Plantagenets, Lancastrians, Yorkists, and Tudors—1-3 Henry VI, Richard III, Edward III (89)
Historiographers wanted to know whether kings were good/bad+why
“Neither the chroniclers nor the playwrights cared as much about the facts as they did about the possibilities” (89)
Structures+Styles in Early Histories (90)
Shakespeare started in middle of story
1 Henry VI—Juxtaposition+Suggestion (90)
Interdependence of character+circumstance
2 Henry VI—Story+Episode (92)
“Episodes serve as emblems: to complete their meanings, audiences must compare such moments to other actions in the play” (93)
Henry’s leadership flawed by inability/unwillingness to act
3 Henry VI—Losers+Winners (94)
Most cohesive storyline of Henry VI
Henry plays role of victim rather than instigator
Richard+Henry face off, neither as king
Richard III—Tragic Pyramid (96)
Standard tragic structure
No subplots
“It is not Richard we mourn for, exactly, but Richard’s tragic defiance of his fate” (97)
“Supports historical determinism from outset, not only by dealing with events of known outcome, but also by repeatedly reminding us of what we know” (97)
Edward III—Parallel Lives (98)
“Explicit connection b/t Edward’s mastery of his emotions+his success as a warrior” (98)
Language (100)
Anaphora: beginning each clause in sequence w/ same word
Epistrophe: repeating same word at end of each clause
1 Henry VI least colloquial play
Very little prose in early histories
None in 1 Henry VI, 3 Henry VI, Edward III
2 Henry VI only has prose due to scenes involving commoners
Rhyme used for emphasis
Causes of History (101)
“Take destiny seriously as a force in human affairs” (101)
“Attitude of these plays toward destiny is not always easy to see” (101)
“Associate it [fate] with universal determinism” (101)
Universal Determinism: idea that every event is part of chain of causation stretching back to beginning of universe
Distinct from fatalism
No clear association b/t destiny, morality in Henry VI
Fatalism not choice, but result of upbringing
Staging Early History Plays (103)
Designed to be performed in public amphitheaters for audiences of 2k-3k people
Pictoral scenery
Scene changes signified by actor swaps rather than set changes
Emsemble plays
Chapter 7—Historical legacy+fiction: poetical reinvention of King Richard III (106)
Richard III ultimate exemplum
Exemplum: political emblem for human degradation, set against idealized regeneration
Shakespeare’s Richard escapes historical boundaries to become stylized, larger-than-life monster
Tyrant archetype in mystery plays often plagued by various infirmities, mirroring his crimes
Richard becomes physical representation of not only monster but deformed body politic
Vice heritage: histrionics+stage managing of Richard as Vice (112)
Vice archetype
Other characters: Iago, Aaron, Don John, Falstaff
Marks: verbal+physical dexterity, puns, changes of tempo+register, deceit, tricks, shifts from controlled/rational/solemn to passionate/angry/amourous, sacrilegious use of oaths+Scriptures, satire, social climbing, misogyny, self-confidence, arrogant trust in others’ gullibility
Senecan influence+tragic dimension of play (116)
Sensational themes
Margaret serves as foil to Richard
Women in this play serve as synecdoche for all women who have suffered from wars
Always appear in 3
Alluiion to Furies, Fates, Marys at foot of Cross
Ghosts appear to Richard
Richard shifts from powerful archetype to pathetic shell of man
Despair considered cardinal sin of church
Richard allowed stoic death like Senecan tyrants
“the play suggests that the tragedy of power is not that it is doomed to fail one day…but that it is bound to crush innocent victims” (122)
Richard III: theatrical+filmic afterlife (122)
Cibber’s 1700 adaptation highlighted Richard’s deformity+increased proportion of titular role
1900s reinstated original text, shifted from acting to interpretation+production
1942, 1944 productions overtly compared Richard to Hitler/Nazis
Chapter 9—Richard II: Shakespeare and the languages of stage (141)
What is unsaid is almost as significant as what is said
Identity, politics, verbal versatility (142)
Highest proportion of key words concerning language of all Shakespeare’s plays
Right to speak both as expression+communication explored from beginning
Richard enslaves himself+his people by talking+acting as if their interests are unimportant
Most powerful voice in the play (commons) never heard
All publications during Elizabeth I’s lifetime censored
Deposition omitted
Elizabeth I identified heavily w/ Richard II
1st considered tragedy, then history, then lamentable comedy
Beyond words: play in performance (147)
Generates questions
Controversial productions
1973 RSC production enforced division of public+private selves w/i king+expressed tragic affinity b/t Richard, Bullingbrook by swapping actors nightly
2000 Almeida performance considered “history of human mind”
Historical+creative contexts (151)
Play about failure
2 major symbolic structural frames: Crusade, garden paradise
Both evoked as lost glories
Anticipates future plays, esp. King Lear