The Demand Curve

Effective Demand

  • Definition: The quantity of a good that consumers are both willing and able to purchase at various prices over a given period.
    • Emphasises actual purchasing power, not mere desire.
    • Distinguishes between hypothetical/"wished-for" demand and feasible, market-backed demand.
  • Significance:
    • Forms the basis for real sales forecasts, inventory planning, and pricing decisions.
    • Underpins all graphical and numerical representations that follow (demand schedules & curves).

Case Study – Carpet Stall (Fez, Morocco)

  • Seller: Aziz Feddal, Henna Souk, Fez.
  • Weekly demand schedule (extracted from Table 3.1):
    • Price (MAD):70,  80,  100,  120,  140,  160,  180\text{Price (MAD)}: 70,\;80,\;100,\;120,\;140,\;160,\;180
    • Quantity (carpets/wk):60,  50,  40,  30,  20,  10,  0\text{Quantity (carpets/wk)}: 60,\;50,\;40,\;30,\;20,\;10,\;0
  • Illustrative Q&A from the text:
    • At price=MAD 100\text{price}=\text{MAD }100, customers buy 50 carpets.
    • As price increases P    Q\uparrow P \;\Rightarrow\; \downarrow Q (demand falls).
    • When price is lowered P    Q\downarrow P \;\Rightarrow\; \uparrow Q (demand rises).
  • Pedagogical take-away: Even in a small market stall, the standard inverse price-quantity relationship holds.

Demand Schedule & Demand Curve

  • Demand schedule: A table pairing each possible price with the corresponding quantity demanded in a given time-frame.
  • Graphical expression: Plot price on the vertical axis, quantity on the horizontal axis; join the points smoothly to obtain the demand curve.
  • Core mathematical property: \frac{dQ}{dP}<0 (negative slope).

Case Study – Electronic Circuit Boards (South Korea)

  • Product: Circuit boards for global television production.
  • Annual demand schedule (Table 3.2):
    • P=2.00\;\text{US$}\;\Rightarrow\;Q=20\;\text{million}
    • P=1.00\;\text{US$}\;\Rightarrow\;Q=40\;\text{million}
    • P=0.50\;\text{US$}\;\Rightarrow\;Q=70\;\text{million}
    • P=0.25\;\text{US$}\;\Rightarrow\;Q=140\;\text{million}
  • Figure 3.1:
    • Down-sloping curve labelled “Demand”.
    • Example highlight: P\,:\,1\ \text{US$}\;\rightarrow\;Q=40\ \text{m}.
    • Price cut 1\to0.50\ \text{US$} shifts quantity 407040\to70 million ((+30\;\text{m})).
  • Demonstrates the pronounced sensitivity of industrial components to price changes.

Movement Along the Demand Curve

  • Trigger: Price change only (ceteris paribus).
  • Represented by sliding along the existing curve, e.g. point ABA\to B in Figure 3.1.
  • Numeric example (circuit boards):
    • \Delta P:1\to0.5\ \text{US$} ; ΔQ:4070 million\Delta Q:40\to70\ \text{million}.
  • Key insight: Such movements do not alter the curve’s position – they reveal different points on the same relationship.

Activity – Demand for Cricket Tickets (India)

  • Stadium capacity: 30,00030{,}000.
  • Figure 3.2 demand curve; selected readings used in textbook questions:
    • If ticket price =Rs 400=\text{Rs }400 ⇒ attendance ≈ 7.5 thousand.
    • To sell out (30 k seats) price must drop to ≈ Rs 200 (implicit answer noted as "5" in the text likely means 200 rupees when scaling on the graph).
  • Illustrates practical use of curves for revenue and capacity planning in event management.

Straight-Line (Linear) Demand Curves

  • Economists often simplify to a straight line for clarity without losing the inverse relation.
  • Figure 3.3 – City-centre car-park spaces:
    • Linear demand from P=100  (Q=0)P=100\;\text{p}\ (Q=0) to Q=600  carsQ=600\;\text{cars} at P=0P=0.
    • Example: Raising the hourly price 6080 p60\to80\ \text{p} cuts occupancy 300150300\to150 cars.
  • Algebraic form (generic): Q=abPQ=a-bP where b>0 denotes slope magnitude.

Shifts in the Demand Curve

  • Occur when non-price determinants change (income, tastes, population, expectations, prices of related goods, etc.).
  • Visualization (Figure 3.4 – Maldives package holidays):
    • Original curve D<em>1D<em>1: at price p</em>1p</em>1 quantity q1q_1.
    • Positive income shock ⇒ curve moves rightward D<em>1D</em>2D<em>1\to D</em>2 ; quantity rises q<em>1q</em>2q<em>1\to q</em>2 at every price.
    • Negative income shock ⇒ curve moves leftward D<em>1D</em>3D<em>1\to D</em>3 ; quantity falls q<em>1q</em>3q<em>1\to q</em>3.
  • Core rule of thumb:
    • Shift right ⇒ higher demand at all prices (outward).
    • Shift left ⇒ lower demand at all prices (inward).
  • Never confuse a shift (curve relocation) with a movement (change along the same curve).

Practical & Conceptual Takeaways

  • The demand curve’s downward slope is one of the foundational “laws” of micro-economics: law of demand.
  • Effective demand anchors analysis in real purchasing power – indispensable for policy, marketing, and operations.
  • Case studies (carpets, circuit boards, cricket tickets, car-parks, holidays) highlight universality across sectors:
    • Luxury items (holidays) still obey the inverse law but are highly income-sensitive (large shifts).
    • Industrial inputs (circuit boards) show large volume swings even with marginal price changes.
    • Perishable capacity (stadium seats, car-park spaces) invites pricing strategies to balance fill-rate vs. revenue.
  • Graph mastery:
    • Vertical axis = PP, horizontal = QQ.
    • Movements vs. shifts must be mechanically and conceptually distinguished.
  • Ethical & strategic implications:
    • Revenue maximisation vs. consumer access (e.g., sports ticket pricing could exclude lower-income fans).
    • Public policy often scrutinises sharp price hikes due to welfare losses predicted by the inverse relationship.
  • Quantitative hooks for further study:
    • Elasticity measurements use precisely these schedules/curves to compute Ed=%ΔQ%ΔPE_d = \frac{\%\Delta Q}{\%\Delta P}.
    • Linear form enables quick slope and elasticity calculations at any point.