Error Theory_default
Introduction to Error Theory
Jeffrey Bagwell, philosophy faculty at Spokane Community College, introduces error theory.
Error theory is a metaphysical theory about existence, not an ethical theory.
Metaphysics: study of fundamental types of existence, beyond physics (subatomic particles, atoms).
What is Error Theory?
Definition: Error theory posits that moral judgments (what is right and wrong) are inherently false.
Claims that values and morality do not exist in the world as features like physical objects do (e.g., mountains or cities).
The Nature of Existence
Error theory compares moral values to physical entities in science:
Physics identifies things like forces (gravity, mass) and particles (atoms, electrons).
Error theorists assert that morality does not correspond to any existing features in the universe.
Moral judgments are compared to statements about fictional creatures (e.g., unicorns having wings).
Understanding Judgments in Error Theory
When making a moral judgment:
Example: "Stealing is wrong" is treated similarly to "Spokane is west of Seattle" (factually false).
Error theorists argue no moral truths exist; thus, statements about right or wrong are always false.
The key concept: moral facts do not hold any truth-value, similar to claims about imaginary entities.
Knowledge and Moral Judgments
Knowledge requires true statements about reality.
Since moral judgments are false because they refer to non-existent concepts:
We cannot claim any knowledge of moral values (e.g., claiming something is good or bad is invalid).
Categorical Reasons vs. Personal Preferences
Categorical reasons: Universal reasons that apply regardless of individual desires.
Example: Exercise is good for health, regardless of personal preference.
Error theory asserts that categorical reasons do not exist in the world.
Moral judgments are fundamentally mistaken belief in objective moral truths that do not exist.
Conclusion: Implications of Error Theory
Error theory reveals a fundamental mistake in moral reasoning—believing in objective moral truths.
Concludes that moral judgments fail to describe the reality of existence.
Ultimately, asserts that:
No moral judgments can be true.
No moral knowledge can exist since values and morality don't exist in the same manner as physical objects.