Diminished Capacity of Clients

Diminished Capacity of Clients

Introduction

  • Focus on representing clients with diminished capacity.
  • Distinction from previous cases involving adult clients with full capacity.
  • Role and duties of attorneys differ in these cases.

Defining Capacity

  • Capacity: Ability to understand circumstances, make choices, and communicate them.
  • Incapacity: Inability to understand, choose, and communicate.
  • Diminished Capacity: Reduced ability due to age, illness, dependency, etc.
  • Varying levels of diminished capacity among individuals.
  • Factors determining diminished capacity (Model Rule 1.14 comment).

Role of the Lawyer

  • Normal attorney-client relationship may not be possible.
  • Adjusted approaches to decision-making authority.
  • Lawyer's role in decision-making increases due to diminished capacity, but client autonomy should still be facilitated.
  • Clients retain the right to make decisions to the extent they are able.
  • Lawyer maintains a "normal" relationship as much as possible (Model Rule 1.14(a)).
  • Adhere to duty of communication and act as advocate/agent.
  • Pursue client's objectives/interests as the client would define them if able.
  • Lawyer takes action based on their reasonable belief of the client's potential decisions.
  • Lawyer may need to advocate for a position not in the client's best interest to respect autonomy.
    • Example: Opposing involuntary confinement despite believing it's beneficial.

Circumstances of Representation

  • Categorization:
    • Normal circumstances
    • Dangerous circumstances
    • Emergency circumstances
Normal Circumstances
  • Decisions do not pose an immediate danger to the client.
  • Example: In the Matter of MR case.
  • Factors to consider:
    • Client's level of capacity.
    • Seriousness of the decision.
    • Gravity of the risk.
    • Ease of changing the decision.
  • Maintain a typical attorney-client relationship and advocate for the client's wishes.
Dangerous Circumstances
  • Attorney cannot maintain a typical relationship or risks are too high.
  • Protective action may be necessary if conditions in Model Rule 1.14 are met.
  • Hypothetical Example (based on a real case):
    • Client with diminished capacity wishes to refuse medical treatment.
    • Respecting autonomy vs. potential harm.
    • Balance different factors, including respecting the client's autonomy.
    • Consider asking court to appoint a guardian ad litem.
Guardians
  • Different types:
    • Guardian of the person: Makes all decisions for the person.
    • Guardian of the estate: Makes decisions about the person's property.
    • Guardian ad litem: Assists the court in making decisions.
  • Lawyer generally follows guardian's instructions, except:
    • Representing the client against the guardian (e.g., terminating guardianship).
    • Guardian instructs actions violating legal/fiduciary duties.
    • Lawyer may seek relief or replacement of the guardian.
  • In the hypo, the lawyer advocated against the client's wishes instead of seeking guardianship; this was incorrect.
  • The lawyer should ask the court to appoint a guardian so that the guardian would be in a position to make decisions for the client and to make recommendations to the court based on what the guardian thought would be the best interest of the client.
  • Need to understand the differences between the roles of an attorney for a client with diminished capacity and the role of a guardian ad litem, and also the need to keep those roles separate.
  • The attorney advocates for the client's decisions; the guardian makes decisions for the client.
  • The attorney owes the client duties, including confidentiality; the guardian owes duties to the court, not confidentiality.
  • Illinois Rule: Serving as both lawyer and guardian is a conflict of interest in delinquency cases.
Child Representative
  • Illinois alternative in divorce cases.
  • A lawyer charged to advocate for the child's position
  • Can decide what is in the best interest of the client and then advocate for that.
  • Child representative advocates for the child's position, decides what is best.
  • The child representative owes his or her duties to the client, while a guardian ad litem owes the duty to the court.
  • May result in multiple representatives (lawyer, guardian, child representative).

Conclusion

  • Next lecture: Representing clients with diminished capacity under emergency circumstances.