Budget and Legislative Updates
House Bill 2 (Substitute)
- Passed by the House and sent to the Senate.
- Adds 9,000,000,000 in new public education funding to the state budget.
- Includes an increase to the basic allotment.
- Mandates raises for staff, with a percentage allocated for teachers, nurses, librarians, and counselors, and the remaining for other staff.
Senate Bill 2 (Voucher Bill)
- Signed by the Governor.
- Adds approximately 1,000,000,000 in costs for the 2026-2027 school year (when it goes into effect).
- Expected to cost around 4,000,000,000 by 2029-2030.
- Potential competition for state funds and possible enrollment loss could impact the public school budget in the future.
Local Budget Reductions
- Approximately 10,600,000 in total reductions made to the budget.
- Budget scenarios developed based on House Bill 2 and potential use of disaster pennies.
Budget Shortfall
- Initial shortfall of 34,600,000.
- Enrollment projection expectations: 3,900,000 loss.
- Loss of SHARS (Student Health and Related Services) revenue due to audit findings: 3,600,000.
- Reduction of vacancy rate contributed to rising costs due to filling positions, adding approximately 8,800,000 to current expenses.
- Anticipated ending of the current year with a 16,800,000 shortfall. Fund balance can cover the amount.
2025-2026 Budget Considerations
- Additional revenue expected from the increase to the golden penny yield and increased safety allotment is around 4,600,000.
- Offset by costs of opening Ferndale Henry, prorated costs for principal and executive assistant and inflationary costs related to fuel and Gold Star contract.
- Deficit in the benefits fund requires a transfer of approximately 15,000,000.
- Three options were considered to address the shortfall, with a recommendation of using a combination of reductions, fund balance, and potentially disaster pennies.
- The community voiced concerns about increasing the student-to-teacher ratio. Changes do not include increases to student-teacher ratios.
Budget Reduction Strategies Implemented
- Identified 10,550,000 in reductions.
- Department-level reductions: Approximately 6,000,000.
- Elimination of 22 vacant administrative positions: Savings of 2,400,000.
- Maintenance and operations reductions: Totaling 4,460,000.
- Software savings: Around 700,000 (shifting some costs to instructional materials allotment).
- Campus-side reductions: Just under 3,000,000 at Title I campuses.
- Shifting funding for designated substitutes from the general fund to Title I funding.
- Innovative staffing model tied to the teacher pipeline: Savings of about 380,000.
- Adjusting campus budgets to match actual expenditures: 1,600,000 in savings by rightsizing budgets.
- Software reductions: 70,000 in savings through eliminating duplicative software and switching to no-cost options.
2025-2026 Budget Planning
- Initial 34,600,000 deficit. Does not include raises, need for operating reductions.
- Potential use of disaster pennies.
- Factoring in House Bill 2, about 35,000,000 in new revenue will be generated. 4,600,000 currently accounted for, reflecting 30,800,000 not currently accounted for.
- 40% of new funding must be spent on raises, with 75% of that allocated to teachers, nurses, librarians, and counselors. The remaining can be used for other staff.
- Preliminary estimates: ~3% raise for teachers (inclusive of step) and ~2% for other staff.
- Total cost of raises: Approximately 17,600,000 (inclusive of step), or 14,600,000 (backing out the step).
- Pending legislation could change these figures; not final until legislative session outcome & board action.
- Even with raises, a 7,800,000 deficit is anticipated while at 86 days of operating reserve. (Under 90 day requirement).
Potential 2026-2027 Budget Outlook
- Potential start with a 7,800,000 deficit based on 2025-2026 projections.
- Revenue-side assumptions: Stable enrollment/attendance based on PASA projections, no changes to federal funding (IDEA/Title I), continued Federal Reserve interest rate cuts resulting in an estimated 2,500,000 loss in interest rate earnings.
- Expenditure-side considerations: Opening of Middle School 16 costs approximately 3,100,000, teacher step increases (estimated 3,600,000), maintaining a 4.5% vacancy factor adds about 3,400,000 in costs, assuming the benefits deficit for '26-'27 could be about 15,000,000 again.
- Potential areas for additional growth: Special Education program costs, potential continuing use of bond contingency for major maintenance.
- Inflation limited impact, no unfunded mandates.
- Worst-case scenario: Could add approximately 27,600,000 to the deficit at the end of the 2026-2027 budget year.
Disaster Pennies
- Potential use of disaster pennies to address uncertainty.
- Board perception that new initiatives or raises are limited due to maintaining a 90-day operating reserve.
- Disaster pennies provide flexibility to build the fund balance above 90 days for addressing board priorities/goals.
- Seven disaster pennies could generate about 35,000,000 after accounting for 5,100,000 in recapture payments (generates 40,200,000 with 5,100,000 for recapture).
- Using disaster pennies with House Bill 2 changes: Fund balance increases by 27,100,000, putting the district at 102 days. Allows for retention supplement.
- Potential scenarios: 500 retention supplement = fund balance increase 21,600,000, 99 days. 1,000 retention supplement = fund balance increase 16,100,000, 97 days.
Taxpayer Impact
- One-time impact to taxpayers, going into effect for the 2025-2026 school year.
- Seven pennies expire at the start of the 2026-2027 school year, and the tax rate would go down.
- Current legislation compresses the tax rate by about 3¢ and may add an additional 40,000 to the homestead exemption.
- If disaster pennies are not implemented, a taxpayer could see a 474 reduction in their tax bill. If implemented, that savings decrease to 274.
- Cost to taxpayers is about 17 a month (approximately 200 per year).
Benefits of Disaster Pennies
- Building an emergency reserve beyond 90 days.
- Covering board priorities associated with one-time program investments.
- Maintaining AA+ bond rating.
- Hedging against enrollment declines due to vouchers.
- Providing a source for unforeseen expenditures such as benefit fund deficits or hurricane repairs (expect reimbursement from FEMA/insurance).
- Program stability.
- Flexibility to strengthen workforce retention through one-time supplements.
- A one-time impact to taxpayers, with the tax rate decreasing by 7¢ in the 2026-2027 school year.
Consequences of Not Using Disaster Pennies
- Projected end to the 2025-2026 school year with a 7,800,000 deficit, putting district at 86 days.
- Limited flexibility to address board priorities/goals or fund innovative ideas.
- No ability to do retention supplements, and the need to significantly scale back premier programming.
Budget Timeline
- Budget workshop planned for May 19th.
- Final budget adoption and public hearing on the tax rate in June.