Federal Courts

Study Notes for Test

Types of Law
  • Statutory Law – Written law passed by legislatures.

  • Common Law – Unwritten law based on judicial precedent.

    • Stare Decisis ("Let the decision stand") – Courts follow previous rulings.

    • Precedent – Past cases used as examples for future rulings.

  • Criminal Law – Laws prohibiting actions punishable by jail time, requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Civil Law (Tort Law) – Disputes between parties, where proof requires a preponderance of evidence (more likely than not).

    • Writ of Mandamus – Court order forcing an action.

    • Injunction – Court order stopping an action.

    • Class Action Lawsuit – Group lawsuit with a common grievance.


Types of Jurisdiction

  1. Exclusive Jurisdiction – Case can only be heard in a specific court.

  2. Concurrent Jurisdiction – Can be heard in either state or federal court.

  3. Original Jurisdiction – Court where the case is first heard.

  4. Appellate Jurisdiction – Court that reviews appeals from lower courts.


Federal vs. State Court Systems

Federal Court System
  • Bottom Level: U.S. District Courts (94 total) – Courts of original jurisdiction.

  • Middle Level: U.S. Court of Appeals (12 Circuits) – Appellate jurisdiction.

  • Top Level: U.S. Supreme Court – Final authority on constitutional law.

State Court System
  • Bottom Level: District/Superior Courts – Trial courts.

  • Middle Level: Court of Appeals – Not every state has this.

  • Top Level: State Supreme Court – Final say on state laws.


Exclusive Federal Court Jurisdiction

Cases that must be heard in federal courts:

  • Constitutional issues.

  • Federal laws and treaties.

  • Admiralty Law (Laws governing maritime issues).

  • Maritime Law (Crimes committed on the sea or involving ships).

  • Disputes between states.

  • U.S. government as a party.

  • Diversity of citizenship cases (citizens of different states).

  • Ambassadors/Diplomats.


The Supreme Court

  • Article III CourtHighest court in the land.

  • Composition: 8 Associate Justices + 1 Chief Justice.

  • Key Powers:

    • Judicial Review (Marbury v. Madison, 1803) – Authority to determine the constitutionality of laws.

    • Interpretation of Laws – Determines how broadly worded laws apply.

    • Overturning Precedents – Can reverse past decisions.

  • Jurisdiction:

    • Original Jurisdiction (Limited to cases involving states, ambassadors, or foreign governments).

    • Appellate Jurisdiction (Most cases come from lower appellate courts).


How Cases Reach the Supreme Court

  1. Writ of Certiorari ("To be made certain") – Petition requesting the Supreme Court to hear a case.

  2. Rule of Four – Four out of nine justices must agree to hear a case.

  3. Possible Outcomes:

    • Full Consideration – Court hears oral arguments and issues a ruling.

    • Per Curiam Opinion – Short, unsigned ruling without oral arguments.

    • Shadow Docket – Emergency rulings issued without full deliberation.


Oral Arguments & Court Procedures

  • Term: First Monday in October – June.

  • Sittings: Hear cases and issue rulings.

  • Recesses: Review cases, vote, and draft opinions.

  • Quorum: At least six justices must be present.

  • Attorney Briefs & Amicus Curiae Briefs ("Friend of the Court") – Outside parties submit opinions.

  • 30-Minute Arguments – Each side presents their case.

  • Friday Conferences – Justices discuss and vote.


Voting Blocs on the Supreme Court

  • Liberals: Sotomayor, Kagan, Brown Jackson.

  • Conservatives: Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett.

  • Swing Vote: Chief Justice Roberts.


Types of Supreme Court Opinions

  1. Unanimous Opinion – All justices agree.

  2. Majority Opinion – Official ruling based on the majority vote.

  3. Concurring Opinion – A justice agrees with the ruling but for different reasons.

  4. Dissenting Opinion – Justices who disagree with the majority explain why.


Key Terms & Latin Phrases

  1. Amicus Curiae ("Friend of the Court") – Outside party submits a brief.

  2. Appellate Jurisdiction – The power of a higher court to review decisions.

  3. Civil Law – Law concerning disputes between individuals.

  4. Class Action Lawsuit – A group of people suing over a common issue.

  5. Concurring Opinion – Agrees with ruling but for different reasons.

  6. Dissenting Opinion – Disagrees with the majority.

  7. Judicial Activism – Courts should interpret laws with modern values.

  8. Judicial Restraint – Courts should follow original intent of the law.

  9. Majority Opinion – The official court ruling.

  10. Original Jurisdiction – The first court to hear a case.

  11. Precedent – Past rulings that guide future cases.

  12. Remand – Sending a case back to a lower court.

  13. Rule of Four – Four justices must agree to hear a case.

  14. Senatorial Courtesy – Senators influence judicial appointments.

  15. Stare Decisis ("Let the decision stand") – Courts follow precedent.

  16. Writ of Certiorari – Request for Supreme Court review.


Flashcards for Study

Front: What is stare decisis?
Back: "Let the decision stand" – The principle that courts should follow precedent.

Front: What is writ of certiorari?
Back: A Supreme Court order to review a lower court decision.

Front: What does amicus curiae mean?
Back: "Friend of the court" – A brief submitted by an outside party.

Front: What is judicial review?
Back: The Supreme Court’s power to determine the constitutionality of a law (Marbury v. Madison, 1803).

Front: What is original jurisdiction?
Back: The authority of a court to hear a case first.

Front: What is appellate jurisdiction?
Back: The authority of a higher court to review a lower court’s decision.

Front: What is judicial activism?
Back: The belief that courts should broadly interpret laws to fit modern needs.

Front: What is judicial restraint?
Back: The belief that courts should interpret laws as they were originally intended.

Front: What is the Rule of Four?
Back: Four Supreme Court justices must agree to hear a case.Front: What is the doctrine of stare decisis?Back: The principle that courts should follow precedent set by previous decisions.