Adverse Selection: A situation where one party in a transaction has more information than the other, often leading to suboptimal market outcomes.
Example: In insurance markets, individuals at higher risk are more likely to seek insurance, leading to higher overall risk for the insurer.
Definition: A situation where one party engages in riskier behavior after a transaction because they do not bear the full consequences of that behavior.
This leads to an increase in risk-taking due to the reduced marginal cost of those actions.
Moral hazard typically occurs after the transaction has been completed.
National Flood Insurance Program:
The government provides insurance in areas where private companies refuse to insure at reasonable rates.
Homeowners may become less cautious about building in flood-prone areas because they are insulated from the full costs of potential damages.
This creates a subsidy for risky behavior.
Personal Example:
The speaker recalls a time mountain biking with a friend who had temporary health insurance.
With coverage, the friend felt emboldened to engage in risky behavior, knowing that the financial consequences of an injury would be mitigated.
This reflects how insurance induces people to change their behavior, increasing overall risk.
Moral Hazard in Labor Markets:
Principal-Agent Problem: Occurs when a principal (e.g., someone hiring a tutor) hires an agent (the tutor) whose actions are not fully observable.
Asymmetric Information: The principal cannot see how hard the agent works or their level of expertise, leading to potential underperformance by the agent.
Example: A student hiring a tutor does not know if the tutor is truly effective, risking poor outcomes due to the tutor's lack of motivation to work hard without oversight.
To counteract moral hazard:
Contracts can be structured with incentives that align both parties’ interests.
Performance-Based Contracts: Bonuses for tutors based on student performance can incentivize them to work harder and provide better quality tutoring.
Such strategies aim to ensure tutors (agents) are motivated to perform to the best of their abilities to achieve mutual success.
The field of Personnel Economics studies how to best align incentives between employees (agents) and employers (principals) to reduce moral hazard.
Strategies may include:
Above Market Wages: Providing higher pay to attract more dedicated workers.
Firing for Underperformance: Establishing stringent consequences for poor performance to deter shirking.
Implications: Broad applications of moral hazard can be seen in various everyday interactions, influencing both economic theory and practical workforce management strategies.