Factorial ANOVA Notes
Factorial ANOVA
Factorial Designs
- Psychologists often investigate the effects of multiple independent variables (IVs) on a dependent variable (DV).
- Factorial Experimental Design: Research designs involving more than one IV.
- Main Effect: The impact of one IV on the DV.
- Interaction: The effect of one IV on the DV depends on the level of another IV.
Factorial Design Example
- Eskine, Kacinik, & Prinz, 2010:
- Investigated whether moral judgments vary with the experience of gustatory disgust.
- Examined if liberals and conservatives differ in making extreme moral judgments based on disgust.
- Method:
- Participants identified as liberal or conservative.
- Participants consumed a bitter beverage, a sweet beverage, or water.
- They read scenarios depicting moral transgressions.
- Participants rated the moral wrongness of each transgression.
2 x 3 Design
- Illustrates a design with two levels of one factor (e.g., Liberal/Conservative) and three levels of another (e.g., Bitter, Neutral/Water, Sweet).
Possible Outcomes
- Potential study outcomes:
- Liberals and conservatives differ in moral judgments.
- Extremity of moral judgments differs across taste conditions.
- The impact of taste on moral judgments varies based on political ideology.
- The study could reveal one or more of these possibilities.
Main Effects and Interactions
- Factorial ANOVA is similar to One-way ANOVA but evaluates multiple effects.
- With two IVs:
- Two main effects.
- One interaction effect.
- Requires multiple Sum of Squares (SS) estimates and F-ratios.
Sum of Squares Total – SST
- Aims to explain the total variability in the outcome variable:
Sum of Squares Within (Error) – SSR
- Error term reflects the pooled variability within each group:
Sum of Squares for the Model – SSM
- Systematic variation explained by the model represents the improvement over simply guessing the grand mean:
Sum of Squares for Main Effects – SSA and SSB
- The sum of squares for the model can be divided into the sum of squares for the main effects:
Sum of Squares for the Interaction – SSA x B
- The sum of squares for the model includes a component for the interaction:
- Degrees of freedom for the interaction term:
Mean Squares and F-Ratios
- Formulas for Mean Squares (MS) and F-ratios:
Example Results: Descriptive Statistics
- Presents descriptive statistics for the extremity of moral judgment based on political orientation (Conservative, Liberal) and taste condition (Bitter, Water, Sweet).
- Includes Mean, Standard Deviation, and N for each group.
Example Results: Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
- Shows ANOVA results with:
- Source, Type III Sum of Squares, df, Mean Square, F, Sig., Partial Eta Squared for Corrected Model, Intercept, ConLib (Political Orientation), Condition (Taste), ConLib*Condition (Interaction), and Error.
- Indicates the significance of main effects and interaction.
Example Results: Marginal Means
- Reports Estimated Marginal Means for:
- Political Orientation (Conservative, Liberal).
- Taste Condition (Bitter, Water, Sweet).
- Includes Mean, Std. Error, and 95% Confidence Intervals.
Factorial ANOVA – Interpreting and Evaluating Effects
- F ratios are omnibus tests.
- Significant Fs require follow-up with planned comparisons or post hoc tests.
Factorial ANOVA – Planned Comparisons for Main Effects
- Follow-up comparisons for main effects are similar to one-way ANOVA.
- Logic and rules are identical.
- Formulas are slightly different.
- If an IV has only two levels, planned comparisons are unnecessary; means can be directly compared.
Main Effect of A - Pairwise Main Comparisons
- is the same as before.
- SSAcomp is the Sum of Squares A comparison.
- n is the number of people in each CELL of the design (assumes equal n).
- b is the number of levels of variable B.
- The b would change to a and equal the number of levels of variable A if we were evaluating the main effect of B.
- SSAcomp = \frac{2(bn)(\psi A)^2}
Pairwise Main Comparisons (Continued)
- Note that, here, there is always 1 degree of freedom, so MScomp will always equal SScomp.
- Note that we use the error term from our omnibus test here.
Main Effect of A – Complex Main Comparisons
- With coefficients, formulas change slightly.
- Incorporate the number of levels of B:
Interaction Effects
- Analyzing interaction effects is more complex.
- Requires a plan of attack.
- Goal: Fully explain the interaction in an interpretable way consistent with theory.
- Types of comparisons:
- Simple Effects
- Pairwise simple comparisons
- Complex simple comparisons
Simple Effects
- The effect of one variable at a specific level of another.
- E.g., the effectiveness of the taste manipulation for conservatives.
- Compute the sum of squares for the simple comparison:
Simple Effects (Continued)
- Degrees of freedom equal the number of groups minus 1 (i.e., k-1)
- F-ratio:
- Use the error term from the omnibus test.
Pairwise Simple Comparisons
- Where n is the number of people in each cell you are comparing (assumes equal n).
- We once again use the error term from our omnibus test.
Complex Simple Comparisons
- Need psi again:
- F formula: , same omnibus error term.
Computation of Effect Sizes
- Report a measure of effect size for any significant effect.
- The most straightforward measure is eta-squared: