Week 2: How Economists Explain

Paradigms, Schools of Thought, Theories, Models

Paradigms

Classical

Neoclassical

Keynesian

Paradigms

Schools of Thought (different articulations of the same shared view, complimentary analytical levels within the same framework)

Theories

Models

Classical

Smithian

Ricardian

Theory of Growth

Theory of Rent

Theory of Foreign Trade

Single Commodity Graph

Double Commodity Graph

Neoclassical

Jevonian

Walrasian

Keynesian

Keynesian

Post-Keynesian

Lipsey and Chrystal’s (1995) “Positive Economics“

Theories

For Lipsey and Chrystal

  • A set of definitions that clearly describe the variables to be used

  • A set of assumptions about the behaviour of these variables

  • A set of predictions that are deduced from the theory

  • A set of test against actual data

Variables: Exogenous v Endogenous

  • Endogenous is explained within the theory

  • Exogenous: influences endogenous variables, but is determined by factors

  • Endogenous variables appear on the axes

  • Exogenous variables do not appear on the axes but do appear in the equations

  • We acknowledge that theories are some reduction of reality. There is some kind of trade-off between the complexity of your model vs your theory

Variables: Stock vs Flow

  • A stock variable represents a variable at a point in time

  • A flow variable is measured over a time interval

Assumptions (1)

  • What drives human behaviour

  • Physical Relations

Assumptions (2)

  • Explicit v unspoken assumptions (aka preconceptions)

    • FOr example, rationality is an explicit assumption

    • But the idea that scarcity is the most important economic phenomenon is often an unspoken assumption

  • Why does this difference matter

    • Because economists working within the same paradigm share many unspoken assumptions

      • This makes it difficult to communicate and compare results across paradigms

Assumption (3)

  • Should assumptions be realistic

  • Objective: simplify enough to capture key mechanisms

    • But not s as to be misleading

    • Increasingly comprehensive models

  • HOw realistic should assumptions be

    • it depends on the problem you are studying

    • but if we want to understand the internal functioning of a firm, it may not be

Predictions

  • Law: in perfectly competitive markets, price equals marginal cost

  • Initial condition: the corn market is a perfectly competitive market

  • Prediction: price of corn equals marginal cost

Predictions vs. forecasts

  • Forcasts are a subset of predictions: predictions about future values of variables based on present variables

  • Many predictions are about discovering a relationship between present values of variables

Tests

  • Athoery’s predictions are tested against empirical evidence

  • Refutation and confirmation

    • TO what extent is it possible to confirm or refuse a theory

    • Problem of induction: thoery-ladennes of data

  • Lipsey and Chrystal claim that theories are “quickly” as one could expect

  • more specifically, we need to distinguish between replacing theories and replacing paradigns

Models

  • Synonym for theory

    • theory and model are used interchangebly

  • Subset of theories

    • neoclassical model meant as a set of theories belonging to the neoclassical paradigm

  • Quantitative formulation of a theory

  • An illustrative abstaction