Poli Sci 4/15 - Voter Participation and Turnout Study Guide

Political Science 101 – Introduction to American Politics

  • Instructor: Professor Tatishe M. Nteta, Department of Political Science.

  • Announcements:     * Today: Participation.     * Wednesday: Participation and Parties.     * Wednesday: Final Exam Review Sheet.     * Next Monday: Zoom Lecture.

The Rationality of Political Participation

  • The Rational Choice Model Equations:     * P \times B > C = \text{Behavior}     * P \times B < C = \text{No Behavior}

  • Components of the Equation:     * PP (Probability): The probability that an individual's behavior will have the desired effect or be impactful on the final outcome.     * BB (Benefits):         * Material: Tangible rewards.         * Solidary: Social benefits of association.         * Purposive: Satisfaction of contributing to a cause.     * CC (Costs):         * Information: Resources spent learning about candidates and issues.         * Time: The hours required to register and vote.         * Transportation: The logistics of getting to the polls.

  • The Problem of Irationality:     * If P \times B < C, rational choice suggests individuals should not participate.     * This leads to individuals "free riding" on the irrationality of others and enjoying the benefits of their preferred candidate's policies without incurring the cost.     * Question remains: Are millions of people irrational if they choose to vote despite these high costs and low probabilities?

Probability and the Decisiveness of a Vote

  • Probability of Deciding an Election (2020 Presidential Election Metrics):     * The chance of a single vote deciding the election varies greatly by state.     * Massachusetts (2020):         * 1 in 500,000,0001\text{ in } 500,000,000 chance the vote results in a tie.         * 1 in 4,000,000,0001\text{ in } 4,000,000,000 chance the vote is decisive.         * Context: Massachusetts population (2020 Census) is 7,029,9177,029,917.     * Selected State Probabilities (Pr(your vote is decisive)Pr(\text{your vote is decisive})):         * New Hampshire: 1 in 1,000,0001\text{ in } 1,000,000         * Pennsylvania: 1 in 2,000,0001\text{ in } 2,000,000         * Florida: 1 in 3,000,0001\text{ in } 3,000,000         * New York: 1 in 3,000,0001\text{ in } 3,000,000         * California: 1 in 7,000,000,0001\text{ in } 7,000,000,000         * Wyoming: 1 in 30,000,000,0001\text{ in } 30,000,000,000

  • Powerball Odds Comparison:     * The odds of winning the Powerball Jackpot are approximately 1 in 175,223,5101\text{ in } 175,223,510.     * It is statistically significantly more likely to win the Powerball than for a vote to be decisive in many U.S. states.

  • Exceptions to the Rule (State-Level Recounts):     * In December 20222022, a Massachusetts state house election flip occurred. Kristin Kassner won against Republican Lenny Mirra by exactly 1 vote1\text{ vote} after a recount.

Demographic Patterns in Voter Participation

  • Class and Pluralism:     * As noted by Elmer Eric Schattschneider: "The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent."

  • Race and Hispanic Ethnicity Turnout Rates (1986–2024):     * Non-Hispanic Whites consistently show higher turnout rates relative to other groups.     * Non-Hispanic Black turnout reached peaks around 20082008 and 20122012.     * Hispanic and other non-Hispanic groups generally show lower turnout rates.

  • Age and Turnout Rates:     * Age 60+60+: Highest turnout rate.     * Age 455945-59: Second highest.     * Age 304430-44: Third.     * Age 182918-29: Consistently the lowest turnout group.

  • Education and Turnout Rates:     * Post-College School: Highest participation rates.     * Some College or College Grad: Elevated participation.     * High School Grad: Lower participation.     * No High School: Lowest participation rates.

The "Three M’s" of Participation

  • Motives: Attitudinal factors making participation more likely.     * Civic Duty: The belief that participation is necessary for a representative democracy to function.     * Political Efficacy: The belief that individual political actions matter and can effect change in people or policies.     * Self Interest: A material stake in the outcome.     * Expectations: The pressure of community organizations and personal networks. Visible signs like "I Voted" stickers serve as proof to one's network that expectations were met.

  • Means: The resources required for participation.     * The formula suggests higher levels of Time, Money (),Experience,andInformationresultinhigherparticipationbecausetheycountertheCosts(), Experience, and Information result in higher participation because they counter the Costs (C).     * Time Disparities:         * Individuals aged 55-64spendspend5.4\text{ hours/day} on leisure/sports.         * Individuals aged 75+spendspend7.5\text{ hours/day}.         * Working parents age 25-54withchildrenunderwith children under18spendonlyspend only2.5\text{ hours/day}onleisure/sportsandon leisure/sports and7.7\text{ hours/day} working.     * Financial Disparities (IRS 2016 data):         * Average Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) for age 18-26::18,798.         * Average AGI for age 45-55::98,597.         * Median Net Worth (2019): Younger than 35isis13.9\text{K},whileage, while age65-74isis266.4\text{K}.     * Information and Barriers for Youth:         * 52\,\% need to rearrange work/school schedules.         * 39\,\% did not know where to vote.         * 26\,\% need help with candidate/ballot information.         * 26\,\% need help discerning truth vs. fake news.         * 25\,\% need to arrange rides.

  • Mobilization: Participation increases when individuals are asked to vote by parties, interest groups, or candidates.     * Who is asked?: Mobilization efforts target those previously turned out, who are demographically older, educated, white, and higher income.     * Impact of Contact (2024 CES): Among those contacted, 72\,\%voted;amongthosenotcontacted,onlyvoted; among those not contacted, only38\,\% voted.     * Contact Disparity by Age: Only 40\,\%ofthoseagedof those aged18-29werecontacted,comparedtowere contacted, compared to60\,\%ofthoseagedof those aged55+.

Low Voter Turnout in the United States

  • Comparative Turnout Statistics:     * U.S. Turnout: 66\,\%inin2020;;64\,\%inin2024.     * Sweden (2018): 82.1\,\%.     * South Korea (2017): 77.9\,\%.     * Israel (2020): 77.9\,\%.     * Canada (2019): 62.4\,\%.

  • Institutional Factors explaining "Low" Turnout:     * Number of Elections: The U.S. has a high frequency of elections at national, state, and local levels due to federalism.         * Example: Northampton, MA (2018–2025) has municipal, state, and federal elections nearly every year, sometimes multiple times (primaries vs. general).         * Example Counterpoint: France has had roughly 11majorelectionssincemajor elections since2018.     * Registration Laws:         * 24 states have Same Day Registration (SDR).         * SDR states typically have turnout rates 7\,\% higher than pre-registration states.         * In 2020,highestturnoutstatesincludedMinnesota(, highest turnout states included Minnesota (80.0\,\%),Colorado(), Colorado (76.4\,\%),andMaine(), and Maine (76.3\,\%), all using either SDR or Vote At Home.     * Election Day (Why Tuesday?):         * 1845 Congress decision based on historical logistical needs: travel by buggies, avoiding church (Sunday), and avoiding market day (Wednesday).         * The U.S. is one of only 9OECDnationswithweekdayvoting;OECD nations with weekday voting;27 nations vote on weekends.     * Electoral System (SMP vs. PR):         * Single Member Plurality (SMP): "50\,\% + 1"winsthedistrict.IftheGOPwinsbyanarrowmargininall" wins the district. If the GOP wins by a narrow margin in all435 districts, they get all seats.         * Proportional Representation (PR): Seats are awarded in proportion to the total vote. In the same scenario, the GOP would get 222seatsandDemocratsseats and Democrats213.         * The probability of a vote "mattering" (P) is higher in PR systems.

Felony Disenfranchisement

  • Statistics:     * 5.2\,\text{million} Americans are legally barred from voting due to felony convictions.     * 48 states prohibit inmates from voting.     * 20 states prohibit felons on probation or parole.     * 11 states disenfranchise felons indefinitely or require a governor’s permission to restore rights.

  • Racial Disparities:     * 1\text{ in } 59 non-black voters are disenfranchised.     * 1\text{ in } 16 African Americans are disenfranchised.     * Black individuals represent 33.3\,\%oftheprisonpopulationbutonlyof the prison population but only12.6\,\% of the total U.S. population.

  • Public Opinion on Reform (2021/2023 UMass Poll):     * Restoring rights after sentence: 79\,\%ofallrespondentsfavorthis(of all respondents favor this (60\,\%Republicans,Republicans,93\,\% Democrats).     * Allowing current inmates to vote: Only 31\,\%ofallrespondentsfavorthis(of all respondents favor this (12\,\%Republicans,Republicans,53\,\% Democrats).     * Making Election Day a National Holiday: 60\,\%totalsupport(total support (38\,\%Republicans,Republicans,80\,\% Democrats).     * Same Day Registration: 57\,\%totalsupport(total support (30\,\%Republicans,Republicans,82\,\%$$ Democrats).