The Courts
3/16:
The Dynamic Court:
Key Term: Courts are “powerful, vigorous, and potent proponents of change” that are responsive to movements seeking political and social change
A Hollow Hope:
Limit nature of constitutional rights
Lack of judicial independence
Lack of powers of implementation
Courts and Social Change:
Four conditions: Courts can produce social change when other political institutions and actors…
incentives
costs to induce compliance
when judicial decisions can be implemented by the market
when the court’s ruling serves ‘as a shield, cover, or excuse, for persons crucial to implementation who are willing to act’
Rights → Harm → Litigation → Remedy → Effective or Ineffective?
Legal Mobilization:
Key term: When a desire or a want is translated into a demand or assertion of rights using law
Key assumptions:
Law is a ‘primary medium of social control and domination’ but…
Language of law exceeds official state forums (e.g., courts)
Legal order is pluralistic (official and unofficial)
Citizen activity is both creatively autonomous and dependent on official order
Effectiveness will depend on the ‘terrain of conflict,’ or sociolegal context
Examine both the direct and indirect effects of legal mobilization on:
Movement building
Reform policy negotiation
Reform policy implementation
Movement Legacy
Movement building:
Agenda Development
Generating Mass Involvement
Reform Policy Negotiation
Law as Club: Threat and/or act of litigation secures negotiation power due to cost, probability of loss or judicial intervention, and/or public condemnation, and will compel concessions
Law as Stick: Threat and/pr act of litigation secures only minimal negotiating power due to unfavorable terrain of conflict and will compel only minimal concessions
Law as Splinter: Threat and/or act of litigation drains resources, yields unfavorable ruling(s), or produces other critical setbacks
Reform Policy Implementation: Stage at which cooptation, existing hierarchies, unequal power, and resources are more likely to limit the effectiveness of lega mobilization
Movement Legacy:
Transforming lega; consciousness
Building movement networks and solidarity
Framing and mobilizing future struggles
Moore v. Dempsey: an example of Legal Mobilization
Four years of appeals before Court agrees to hear the case on writ of habeas corpus
Mob-dominated trials violate the 14th Amendment right to due process
Entire process corrupted - no appeals process will remedy
Open state criminal court proceedings to federal judicial oversight
1882-1968: 4,743 lynchings across the U.S. (72% Black victims)
Mob-dominated trials persist, particularly in the South
All-white juries persist across the U.S. despite Court’s ruling in Strauder (1880)