Social Engineering and Identity Theft Flashcards

Social Engineering Statistics and Scope

  • Email Volume and Security Risks

    • Total annual email volume: 107 Trillion107 \text{ Trillion}.
    • Daily email volume: 294 Billion294 \text{ Billion}.
    • Approximately 90%90\% of all email is classified as either spam or contains a virus.
  • Phishing Statistics

    • Phishing represents 77%77\% of all socially based attacks.
    • 88%88\% of individuals reported clicking links within phishing emails.
    • Primary targets: Most common phishing attacks mimic financial institutions.
    • In 2013, there were 13.3 Million13.3 \text{ Million} user-reported phishing attacks.
  • Vishing (Voice Phishing)

    • In 2012, 2.4 Million2.4 \text{ Million} customers were targeted for phone fraud.
    • In the first half of 2013, 2.3 Million2.3 \text{ Million} customers were targeted for phone fraud.
    • Financial Impact: The average loss for a targeted business is $42,546\$42,546 per account.
  • Smishing (SMS Phishing)

    • In 2012, 60%60\% of U.S. adults who send and receive text messages received mobile spam.
    • Requests made by Smishers:
      • 60%60\% ask the victim to click on a link.
      • 26%26\% ask the victim to call a specific number.
      • 14%14\% ask the victim to reply to the text.
  • Impersonation Data

    • Medical Theft: In 2013 alone, there were 1.8 Million1.8 \text{ Million} victims of medical theft caused by websites impersonating medical providers.
    • Data Vulnerability: 88%88\% of reported stolen assets were personal data.
    • Victim Demographics: Average age of an impersonation victim is 41.7 years old41.7 \text{ years old}.
    • Financial Loss: The average loss per victim is $4,187\$4,187.
    • Common Theft Location: The top place for a thief to operate is the work area.

Social Engineering (SE) Concepts and Behavioral Basis

  • Definition: Social Engineering is the art of convincing people to reveal confidential information.

  • Primary Targets:

    • Help desk personnel.
    • Technical support executives.
    • System administrators.
  • The Human Element

    • Social engineers rely on the fact that people are often unaware of the value of the information they possess and are careless about protecting it.
    • Behaviors Vulnerable to Attack:
      • Trust: The basic human nature of trust serves as the foundation for any SE attack.
      • Ignorance: A lack of knowledge about SE techniques and their potential effects among a workforce.
      • Fear: Victims may comply with requests out of fear of severe losses or repercussions for non-compliance.
      • Greed: Attackers lure targets by promising "something for nothing."
      • Moral Obligation: Targets are often asked for help and comply out of a desire to be helpful or a sense of duty.

Organizational Vulnerabilities and Attack Phases

  • Factors Making Companies Vulnerable:

    • Insufficient security training for staff.
    • Unregulated or unrestricted access to information.
    • Complexity arising from having several distinct organizational units.
    • A lack of formal security policies.
  • Efficacy of Social Engineering:

    • Security policies are only as strong as their weakest link; humans are the most susceptible link in the chain.
    • SE attempts are notoriously difficult to detect.
    • There is no single method to ensure complete security from such attacks.
    • No specific software or hardware exists that can fully defend against social engineering.
  • Phases in a Social Engineering Attack:

    1. Research on Target Company: Utilizing methods like dumpster diving, searching websites, and observing employees.
    2. Select Victim: Identifying vulnerable individuals, such as frustrated or disgruntled employees.
    3. Develop Relationship: Establishing a rapport with the selected employees.
    4. Exploit the Relationship: Collecting sensitive account details, financial information, and data regarding current technologies used by the firm.

Human-Based Social Engineering Techniques

  • Impersonation: The most common human-based technique. Attackers pretend to be legitimate or authorized individuals (e.g., technicians, executives). This can occur in person or via phone/email.
  • Eavesdropping: Unauthorized listening to conversations or reading of messages. This involves intercepting communication across telephone lines, email, or instant messaging.
  • Shoulder Surfing: Using direct observation to steal passwords, PINs, or card numbers. It can be done from a distance using vision-enhancing devices like binoculars.
  • Dumpster Diving: Searching through a target's trash for sensitive documents or information.
  • Reverse Social Engineering: An attacker sets themselves up as an authority. The victim, believing the attacker can help, seeks them out and voluntarily provides the requested information. This usually involves three steps:
    1. Sabotage.
    2. Marketing.
    3. Tech Support.
  • Piggybacking: An authorized person intentionally or unintentionally allows an unauthorized person to pass through a secure door (e.g., "I forgot my ID badge.").
  • Tailgating: An unauthorized person (often wearing a fake ID) enters a secured area by closely following an authorized person through a key-access door.

Computer-Based and Mobile-Based Techniques

  • Computer-Based SE:

    • Pop-up Windows: Windows that appear during web surfing asking for login or sign-in credentials.
    • Hoax Letters: Emails warning users about non-existent viruses or worms to induce panic/action.
    • Chain Letters: Emails offering gifts or money on the condition that the mail is forwarded to others.
    • Instant Chat Messenger: Chatting with users to extract personal details like birth dates or maiden names.
    • Spam Email: Unsolicited mail used to collect SSNs, financial data, and network information.
    • Phishing: Illegitimate emails mimicking trustworthy sites to acquire account information.
    • Spear Phishing: A targeted version of phishing aimed at specific individuals or small groups within an organization. It results in a much higher response rate than generic phishing.
  • Mobile-Based SE:

    • Malicious Apps: Attackers publish apps with attractive features and names similar to popular apps on major stores to infect devices and steal credentials.
    • Fake Security Applications (Workflow):
      1. Attacker infects the victim's PC.
      2. Victim logs into a bank account on the PC.
      3. Malware on the PC triggers a pop-up telling the victim to download a security app on their phone.
      4. Victim downloads the malicious mobile app.
      5. Attacker intercepts the second authentication factor (SMS) sent by the bank to the phone.
    • SMS Fraud Case Study: A victim (Tracy) receives a "urgent" SMS from a bank's security department. She calls the number provided, which is a recording that asks for her credit or debit card numbers, leading her to reveal sensitive data.

Insider Threats and Organizational Defense

  • Insider Attacks:

    • They are easy to launch and difficult to prevent because the attacker already has legitimate access.
    • Motivations:
      • Spying: Competitors plant moles via job openings to steal secrets or damage the business.
      • Revenge: A single disgruntled person can compromise an entire company.
    • Prevention Strategies:
      • Separation and rotation of duties.
      • Principle of Least Privilege.
      • Controlled access and strict logging/auditing.
      • Formal legal policies.
      • Archiving all critical data.
  • Targets and Specific Defense Strategies:

    • Front Office/Help Desk: Threatened by eavesdropping/impersonation; defend by training staff NEVER to reveal passwords over the phone.
    • Perimeter Security: Threatened by fake IDs/piggybacking; defend with strict badge, token, or biometric authentication.
    • Office Area: Threatened by shoulder surfing/ingratiation; defend with best practices, checklists, and escorting all guests.
    • Mail Room: Threatened by theft/forging; defend by locking and monitoring the room.
    • Machine Room/Phone Closet: Threatened by equipment removal or protocol analyzers; defend by keeping rooms locked at all times and maintaining updated equipment inventories.

Social Networking Risks and Identity Theft

  • Social Networking Site (SNS) Risks:

    • Impersonation: Attackers create accounts in others' names to extract information from friends and colleagues.
    • Involuntary Data Leakage: Employees posting sensitive corporate data due to a lack of strong policy.
    • Data Theft: SNS act as repositories of information vulnerable to exploitation.
    • Network Vulnerability: Flaws/bugs in SNS platforms can expose the corporate network.
  • Identity Theft:

    • Defined as the theft of personally identifiable information (Name, SSN, Credit Card Number, Driver's License) for fraudulent purposes.
    • Attackers may use stolen identities to physically access facilities or impersonate employees.

Social Engineering Countermeasures

  • Policy and Procedure:

    • Policies are only effective if taught and reinforced. Employees should sign acknowledgments of their understanding.
    • Password Policies: Include periodic changes, complexity requirements, account blocking after failures, and strict secrecy.
    • Physical Security Policies: ID cards, uniforms, visitor escorts, restricted access areas, and proper document shredding.
  • Training and Operations:

    • Training: Comprehensive programs to increase awareness of SE techniques.
    • Access Privileges: Clearly defined Guest, User, and Administrator accounts with appropriate authorizations.
    • Information Classification: Categorize data (e.g., Top Secret, Proprietary, Internal Use, Public).
    • Background Checks: Perform checks on new hires and implement proper termination processes for exiting employees.
    • Technical Defenses: Use multi-layer Anti-Virus/Anti-Phishing at end-user and gateway levels. Use Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for high-risk services like VPNs.
  • Detecting Phishing Emails (Red Flags):

    • Generic greetings.
    • Appears to be from a known contact or reputable company.
    • Creates a sense of urgency or threats.
    • Grammatical or spelling errors.
    • Contains spoofed links or malicious attachments.
    • Offers that seem "too good to be true."
  • Anti-Phishing Toolbars:

    • Netcraft: Provides risk ratings and site reports.
    • PhishTank: A collaborative clearinghouse for phishing data with an open API for developers.
  • Social Engineering Toolkit (SET):

    • An open-source, Python-driven tool designed for penetration testing specifically around social engineering vectors.