Gene Therapy for Haemophilia
Overview of Haemophilia
Definition
Haemophilia A: Caused by deficiency of factor VIII.
Haemophilia B: Caused by deficiency of factor IX.
Pathophysiology
Both types of haemophilia are characterized by a reduced ability to generate thrombin due to the deficiency of the respective clotting factors, leading to increased risk of bleeding.
Clotting Factors and Bleeding Rates
Clotting Cascade Importance
Factor VIII and IX are critical in the clotting cascade, playing vital roles in forming a fibrin clot.
Factor VIII interacts with Factor IX to activate Factor X.
Factor IX is activated by Factor XI and then interacts with Factor VIII in the intrinsic pathway.
Thrombin Generation: Ultimately leads to fibrinogen conversion to fibrin.
Bleeding Rates
Severe Haemophilia:
Factor activity < 1%: spontaneous bleeding episodes which may occur into joints, muscles, and soft tissues.
Mild Haemophilia:
Factor activity between 1-5%: bleeding typically occurs after trauma, injury, dental work, or surgery.
Endogenous Factor Activity:
Greater than 10% normal value correlates with a low risk of spontaneous bleeding.
Treatment Aim:
Increase factor levels above 10%.
Historical Perspective on Haemostatic Therapies
Past Treatments
Plasma-derived coagulation factors used until the 1980s.
Shift caused by the awareness of HIV transmission; significant infection rates among haemophilia patients receiving infected blood products.
Present Treatments
Current practice involves:
Recombinant purified coagulation factors: Safer alternatives to plasma-derived products.
Development of inhibitors observed in some patients.
Short half-life necessitating frequent infusions.
Emerging Gene Therapy: Major breakthrough for haemophilia A & B.
Why Target Haemophilia for Gene Therapy?
Monogenic Disorder:
Both types are monogenic disorders, necessitating alteration in a single gene.
Partial Restoration:
Restoration to less than 100% normal levels is effective for treatment.
Liver Targeting:
Gene therapy vectors target liver cells, serving as a “protein factory” for distribution throughout the body.
Success Measurement:
Success can be easily measured through factor activity levels.
Gene Delivery Approach
Initial Focus on Factor IX
Factor IX gene therapy (haemophilia B) attempted as it is a smaller gene compared to factor VIII.
Adeno-associated Virus (AAV) Vector:
High efficiency in transducing cells.
Offers long-term transgene expression.
Low immunogenicity potential with selective tissue tropism.
Challenges:
High immunogenic response related to the viral capsid may cause hepatotoxicity in some cases.
Eligibility Criteria for Gene Therapy
Age: 18 years or older.
History of Inhibitors: No prior development of factors inhibiting proteins.
Liver Health: No serious liver diseases.
Antibody Status: No pre-existing antibodies to the AAV vector.
Eligibility Statistics:
40-50% of patients with severe haemophilia A.
40-60% of patients with severe haemophilia B.
Specifics of Haemophilia B Gene Therapy Approach
Mechanism and Administration
AAV Vector: Hepatocyte-directed, expressing factor IX.
Administration Impact: Leads to endogenous factor IX (FIX) expression in the liver.
Early Issues:
Initial therapies noted either low but durable FIX expression, or high but transient FIX expression.
Factor Expression Variability
Overview
Variability in factor expression from no expression to above-normal levels noted.
Typically, FVIII levels lower than FIX plasma levels.
Factor IX ‘Padua’ Variant
Observed in a child with thrombophilia having a FIX variant.
Mutation at position 338 (R338L) from arginine to leucine results in FIX Padua having 10-15 times higher activity compared to wild-type FIX.
Potential Application: Exploring whether FIX Padua could boost overall FIX activity.
Current Developments in Therapy
Etranacogene Dezaparvovec (CSL Behring)
Yielded high, durable FIX activity in trial patients.
Associated with minimal bleeding events and a favorable safety profile.
Now employed in many haemophilia B clinical trials (Pipe et al, NEJM 2023).
Challenges in Haemophilia A Gene Therapy
Size and Expression Issues
Size of FVIII gene poses a significant technological challenge; exceeds AAV packaging capacity.
Expression durability remains a critical concern and is often limited in clinical trials.
Potential Solutions
Gene engineering efforts to remove unnecessary coding sequences (e.g., the deletion of the B domain to create BDD-FVIII).
Result: Increased endogenous FVIII expression by approximately tenfold, though drop-off levels remain unexplained.
Clinical Trials in Haemophilia A Gene Therapy
Trial Overview
Trial/Therapy | Sponsor | Vector Type | Transgene | Key Outcomes/Durability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec | BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | AAV5 | BDD-FVIII | Sustained FVIII activity, reduced annualized bleeding rate; Durability >5 years in some patients |
Giroctocogene Fitelparvovec | Pfizer Inc. & Sangamo Therapeutics | AAV6 | BDD-FVIII | Increased FVIII activity and reduced ABR; Ongoing assessment of long-term durability |
SPK-8011 | Spark Therapeutics | AAV-Spark200 | BDD-FVIII | Variable FVIII expression, some challenges in consistent sustained levels; Phase 1/2 |
TAK-754 | Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. | AAV-rh10 | BDD-FVIII | Demonstrated FVIII expression in early phases; Further clinical trials underway |
Investigational Gene Therapy - Early | Various / Academic | Novel AAV Serotypes | Optimized FVIII | Exploring improved FVIII expression and enhanced durability; Preclinical/early clinical |
Gene Therapy Candidate - Phase 1 | Biotechnology Startup | Engineered AAV | Novel FVIII | Initial safety and dose-finding; Preliminary evidence of FVIII expression |
Challenges Facing Gene Therapy
Cost and Accessibility
High treatment costs, even for a proposed ‘one-off’ treatment.
Only individuals without existing anti-AAV immunity are eligible.
Future dosing challenges due to immune response limiting repeat therapies.
Global Accessibility
Queries about accessibility for patients in developing countries.
Questions regarding the justification of costs if factor levels drop, necessitating factor replacement.
Response Uncertainty
No current indications predicting which haemophilia patients will develop satisfactory factor levels post-gene therapy.
Necessity for biomarkers to identify responsive individuals to optimize gene therapy effectiveness.
Durability of Treatment
Uncertainty surrounding how long factor levels will remain sufficient to prevent bleeding episodes.
FVIII expression durability averages 5-8 years; factor IX expression may last up to 10 years, with variability seen among individuals.
Safety Considerations
Short-Term Risks
Potential liver inflammation upon delivery of gene therapy to liver cells.
Steroidal treatments commonly utilized post-delivery; for approved FVIII therapies, 86% of individuals required steroids for an average duration of 7 months.
Long-Term Risks
Concern regarding the partial integration of gene therapy vectors into patient DNA.
Potential increased cancer risk if integration occurs in oncogenic regions of the genome.
Noted 4 unrelated cases of cancer in haemophilia gene therapy trials.
Conclusion
Gene therapy for haemophilia A and B is a promising new therapeutic modality.
Current methodologies involve hepatocyte-directed AAV vectors.
Despite significant achievements, various limitations remain, warranting ongoing research.