Study Notes on Asset-Based Community Development
Overview of Asset-Based Community Development
Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) focuses on utilizing a community’s strengths and successes rather than its needs and deficiencies.
This approach fosters a positive community vision and emphasizes sustainable development through the identification and building of community assets.
Key aim: To improve quality of life in communities by enhancing their inherent capabilities.
Introduction
Chapter 1 discussed philosophical foundations for community development, emphasizing the importance of diversifying local economies in a knowledge-based economy.
The shift from needs-based to asset-based community development leads to more sustainable outcomes.
Definition of Community: Refers to both governmental entities (e.g., cities) and undefined areas (e.g., neighborhoods).
This chapter also outlines major steps in planning for an asset-based community development strategy.
Definitions of Community Development
Various definitions illustrate the multi-faceted nature of community development:
- Ferguson and Dickens (1999): "Community development is asset building that improves the quality of life among residents of low- to moderate-income communities."
- Chaskin (2001): "Community building consists of actions to strengthen the capacity of communities to identify priorities and opportunities."
- Green and Haines (2007): "Community development is a planned effort to produce assets that increase the capacity of residents to improve their quality of life."
- Vidal and Keating (2004): "Community development is a place-based approach to creating assets that benefit people in poor neighborhoods."
Critical Components of Community Development Definitions
Place-Based Focus: Communities can be defined as geographical areas rooted in a physical environment (neighborhoods, towns, cities) or interest groups (e.g., professional associations, sports teams).
Building or Creating Assets:
- Definition: An asset is a resource or advantage within a community.Improvement of Quality of Life:
- A vague concept; indicators must be defined by each community, considering economic, social, psychological, physical, and political aspects.
- Examples of indicators include:
- Number of violent crimes
- Employment statistics
- Community gardening participation
- Waste generated and recycled.Focus on Low- to Moderate-Income Communities: ABCD primarily focuses on lower-income communities where resources and recognition of assets are often limited.
Sustainability: ABCD emphasizes financial, economic, environmental, and social sustainability, aiming for long-term improvements.
Contrast to Needs-Based Development: Needs-based approaches often highlight problems, leading to community members feeling overwhelmed and unfulfilled.
Needs-Based Community Development
Conventional methods identify issues and needs within communities, often emphasizing negative factors:
- Examples: Vacant homes, high unemployment, and lack of services.Focusing merely on problems can obscure root causes and lead to frustration or overwhelm among community residents.
Asset-Based Community Development
Core Principle: Focus on building a community’s capacity by identifying and enhancing existing strengths rather than its deficiencies.
The asset-based approach promotes a view that can lead to empowerment and engagement among community members by highlighting existing resources and successes.
This method is designed to lead to a snowball effect, enhancing both assets and addressing needs in a positive context.
Definition of Assets
General Definition: An asset can be defined as a stock of wealth or a useful quality that provides an advantage or resource for a community.
Types of Assets:
- Kretzmann and McKnight (1993): Defined as "gifts, skills, and capacities" of individuals and organizations.
- Ferguson and Dickens (1999): Identify five forms of community capital: physical, human, social, financial, and political.
- Green and Haines (2007): Broadened to seven forms, adding environmental and cultural capital.For this chapter, focus will be on three primary forms of capital:
- Physical Capital: Includes built environments and infrastructure.
- Human Capital: Skills, talents, and knowledge of individuals.
- Social Capital: Represents social networks and relationships among community members.
Physical Capital
Definition: Includes infrastructure, natural resources, and built environments such as roads, buildings, parks, and community institutions.
Characteristics:
- Largely immobile, enduring, and influenced by both public and private investment.
- Essential features may include schools, hospitals, parks, highways, and utilities.
Human Capital
Definition: Encompasses the skills, knowledge, and capacities of community members, including all age groups.
Includes labor market skills, leadership capabilities, artistic talents, educational backgrounds, and health-related knowledge.
Human capital is mobile, shifting as individuals move and societal skills evolve.
Social Capital
Definition: Refers to the relationships and networks established within a community, combining trust, norms, and connections.
Types of Social Capital:
- Formal Ties: These are established through organizations and often act as weak ties (e.g., service clubs).
- Informal Ties: Established through personal relationships, generally strong, requiring time investment.Bonding vs. Bridging Capital:
- Bonding Capital: Strengthens existing relationships among similar individuals.
- Bridging Capital: Expands networks beyond established circles, fostering new relationships.Social capital is crucial for mobilizing community resources and fostering collaboration.
The Process of Asset-Based Community Development
Overview
ABCD involves several non-linear steps:
1. Community Organizing: Mobilizing individuals to work towards shared objectives.
2. Visioning: Developing a long-term vision for community goals.
3. Planning: Creating actionable strategies based on data and community feedback.
4. Implementation and Evaluation: Actual execution of actions coupled with the monitoring of outcomes.
Community Organizing
Focuses on mobilizing residents within a geographical area, distinct from interest-based organizing.
Direct actions can range from grassroots initiatives to larger campaigns aimed at structural change.
Models of Community Organizing:
- Alinsky Model: Utilizes professional organizers to identify community issues through local organization engagement.
- Boston Model: Engages residents individually and appeals to their self-interests.
- ACORN Model: A mixture of both previous methods.
- IAF Model: Trains community organizers to build strong ties within existing organizations.
Visioning
Visioning aims to create a shared long-range view of the community's future.
Components of successful visioning include:
1. Inclusive Invitation: Encouraging diverse participation for varied perspectives.
2. Meaningful and Efficient Process: Ensuring that discussions yield actionable results.
3. Public Participation Techniques: Engaging the community through brainstorming and analysis methods to develop clearer visions.
Planning
Involves preparing action plans with:
1. Data collection and analysis
2. Asset mapping to identify available community resources
3. Community surveys to evaluate priorities and public opinionsSurveys serve to gauge community attitudes and refine action steps moving forward.
Public Participation
Essential for ensuring community involvement in decision-making processes.
Effective participation creates opportunities for residents to influence outcomes and feel ownership over community initiatives.
Implementation and Evaluation
This phase involves the activation of action plans designed to yield measurable outcomes.
Action Plans: Defined steps for achieving community goals, outlining specific projects, deadlines, and personnel responsibilities.
Monitoring: Continuous assessment of the community effort for adjustments and effectiveness.
Evaluation: Measuring both outputs (immediate results) and long-term outcomes, such as improved quality of life indicators.
Challenges of the Community Development Process
Difficulties can arise from diverse interests leading to challenges in achieving consensus and compromises among community members.
The process can be time-consuming and may lead to frustration if progress is not visible.
Costs associated with various forms of public participation should be managed effectively to ensure both feasibility and success of community initiatives.
Conclusion
Asset-Based Community Development emphasizes leveraging local assets to create sustainable and thriving communities.
The ultimate objective remains clear: to foster a better quality of life through a comprehensive understanding of community strengths and capital forms. A vibrant community revitalization requires the identification and connectivity of all available local resources.