federalism
neither ‘federal’ nor ‘federalism’ are mentioned in the Constitution
implied:
separation of powers
elastic clause
concurrent powers - federal n state can tax
10th amendment - all remaining powers to states
SC umpire between federal and states
2 features:
the power of states is protected by the Constitution
regional powers are equal
∴ sovereignty is shared
state powers can’t be changed without their consent
all states have the same level of decision-making powers although they are free to interpret
how the relationship works:
in some aspects, the division of sovereignty was clear initially
the state deals with most parts of domestic policy inc education and economic policy
fed govt limited to foreign policy n security
national govt = expressed, implied n inherent powers
shared national n state powers = concurrent powers
state govts = reserved powers
powers delegated to the national govt | shared | powers reserved to states |
declare war | raise taxes | establish local governments |
create n maintain armed forces | provide for the public welfare | establish n maintain schools |
establish foreign policy | criminal justice | regulate trade within states |
regulate interstate n foreign trade | borrow money | conduct elections |
make copyright n patent laws | charter banks | provide for public safety |
establish postal offices | build roads | |
coin money |
evolution:
this relationship has evolved over time
westward expansion = more states created
industrialisation led to the need for more federal regulation
growing population » 4 mil in 1790, 76 mil by 1900, 322 mil by 2016
improving comms » faster transport, telegraph, radio, internet = fostered national identity
the great depression (led to roosevelt’s new deal) massively boosted the power of the federal govt » erosion of state power
ww1 n ww2 pushed the country into being a superpower n ‘the world’s policeman’ » federal govt controls foreign policy, so role heightened
1930s to 70s = increase in federal power, financially
nixon started run of republican presidents who urged less centralisation
‘new federalism’ » block grants given to states, could use as wished
federal deficit in 1980s » money dried up, ‘unfunded mandate’
gonzales v raich (2005):
when cali legalised marijuana, fed govt argued this was a federal matter, not state » drug would end up reaching the wider country
SC interpreted the ‘interstate commerce law’ in favour of California
court argued legislation of production on Cali would have an impact on the supply n demand of the drug across the USA
biden pardons:
federal level: obama, trump n biden have all pardoned ppl in prison for weed possession, at national level
oct 22, biden: “sending people to prison for possessing marijuana has upended too many lives and incarcerated people for conduct that many states no longer prohibit”
promised to call upon all state governors to issue their own weed pardons
federalism weaponised?
trump, in power and since, has tried to use relationship between fed govt n states to his political advantage
as president:
lambasted states that defied his ideas, labelled them enemies; attacked judges that disagreed with them
since:
has encouraged states to defy biden administration n supported picks for governors n senators that endorse that view for elections
leaders like desantis n cruz very much in trump style n actively defy the fed govt