Bridge Design Notes

Bridge Design

I) Selection of Prosthesis Type

  • Missing teeth can be replaced by:
    • Implant-supported F.P.D
    • Tooth-supported F.P.D
      • Conventional F.P.D
      • Resin-bonded F.P.D
    • Removable partial denture

Components of a Bridge

  • Pontic: The artificial tooth that replaces the missing tooth.
  • Abutment: The natural tooth that supports the bridge.
  • Retainer: The restoration that attaches the pontic to the abutment.
  • Connector: Connects the pontic to the retainer.
  • Superstructure
  • Substructure
  • Preparation
  • Framework
  • Edentulous Ridge
  • Span
  • Wing

Types of Dentures

  • Removable Complete Denture
  • Removable Partial Denture
  • Implant Over Denture

Deciding Factors for FPD/RPD Construction

  1. Length of Edentulous Area
    • Number of missing teeth anteriorly.
    • Number of missing teeth posteriorly.
    • The effect of arch curvature in FPD design.
  2. Position of Edentulous Area
    • Bounded or free-end saddle.
    • Unilateral, bilateral, or multiple.
    • Controversy regarding cantilever in restoring distal free-end edentulous area.
    • Role of implant-supported restoration in the case of free-end saddle.
  3. Abutment Alignment
    • Tilted abutment more than 25 degrees $\Rightarrow$ R.P.D
    • Widely divergent abutment $\Rightarrow$ R.P.D
  4. Abutment Status and Periodontal Condition
    • Vitality.
    • Existing caries and remaining tooth structure.
    • C/R ratio.
    • Root configuration.
    • Antes' Law.
    • Mobility.
  5. Occlusion
    • Adaptation.
    • Deep bite and para-functional habits effect on FPD design and implant.
  6. Ridge Form
    • Mild resorption.
    • Moderate resorption.
    • Severe resorption.
  7. General Factors
    • Age.
    • Systemic condition.
    • Dry mouth.
    • Tongue size.
    • Gagging reflex.
    • Patient attitude to RPD.

Treatment Plan Selection Sequence

  • Implant is preferable if indicated at any situation.
  • Resin-bonded bridge is the 2nd choice $\rightarrow$ to restore missing one tooth (except missing lower two centrals).
  • From the 2nd premolar $\rightarrow$ R.B.Br comes after conventional designs because of ↓ retention and resistance.
  • Conventional bridge design.

A ) Implant – Supported F.P.D

►Indication:

  • Single tooth can be replaced with a single abutment $\rightarrow$ saving adjacent teeth from destructive preparation.
  • Span length of 2$\rightarrow$6 teeth $\rightarrow$ replaced by multiple implants either $\rightarrow$ single –unit restoration $\rightarrow$ implant-supported F.P.D.
  • In case of no distal abutment.
  • Full arch can be replaced by implant-supported complete prosthesis.
  • Sufficient alveolar bone density.
  • In case of compromised abutment which can not support long span prosthesis.
  • In dry mouth (better than natural teeth $\rightarrow$ otherwise caries).

B) Resin Bonded Tooth-Supported F.P.D

  • Indication:
    • i) Defect-free abutment.
    • ii) Patient with bounded edentulous area (single tooth loss→except missing lower two centrals).
    • iii) Edentulous ridge with moderate resorption $\rightarrow$ & no gross soft tissue defects.
    • iv) sufficient enamel for bonding.
    • v) Young pt with large pulp $\rightarrow$ because It is conservative within enamel.
    • vi) Pt with normal bite. $\rightarrow$ i.e deep vertical overlap is contra-indicated.

C) Conventional Tooth-Supported F.P.D

  • It is an artificial restoration spanning missing area in the dental arch.
  • It is fabricated either from metal/non metal/combined material.
  • It restore the masticating surface of posterior and anterior teeth.
Components of the bridge:
  1. Abutment
    • It is the natural tooth/teeth or roots which support the bridge from both or one end.
  2. Retainer
    • it is an artificial restoration rebuilding the prepared abutment tooth restoring function and esthetic + it retains the bridge in its position.
      • Requirements of ideal retainer:
        1. it should constructed from material with high mechanical properties
        2. it provide good retention
        3. provide good esthetic if used in anterior area
  3. Pontic
    • it is the suspended from the bridge which restore the coronal portion of the missing tooth/teeh restoring function and esthetic.
  4. Connector
    • it is that part of the bridge which connecting the retainer and the pontics . it is either :
      • rigid connector
      • non rigid connector.
Types of Conventional Bridges
  • a) Fixed–Fixed F.P.D:
    • It is a F.P.D where retainer & pontic are soldered together at both end.
  • b)Fixed–Supported F.P.D ( fixed – movable bridge)
    • It is a F.P.D where retainer & pontic are soldered at one end while at the other end joined together by non-rigid connector.
  • c)Fixed–Free F.P.D (cantilever)
    • It is a F.P.D in which the pontic is fixed to one retainer while the other end is free.
  • d)Spring cantilever
    • It is a F.P.D where the pontic is at the end of resilient curved arm deriving its support from remote abutment.
    • (used in case of diastema)
  • e)Removable bridge: (Precision attachment bridge)
    • It is a bridge in which the retainer consists of two parts $\rightarrow$ one cemented to the abutment tooth (coping) and one soldered/connected to the pontic (telescoping crowns).
    • The two retainers are frictionally retained to each other.
    • The bridge can be removed by the patient for cleaning purpose.

Indications

  • In general fixed-fixed bridge is Indicated for:
    • missing two teeth post. (maximum)
    • missing four teeth ant. (maximum)
    • according to periodontal membrane area ( ante´ s law)
    • Otherwise $\rightarrow$ R.P.D
  • In young patients because of large pulp size $\Rightarrow$ root canal treatment may be done.

D) R.P.D

Indicated for:
  • Edentulous spaces greater than $\rightarrow$two post. Teeth $\rightarrow$four ant. Teeth.
  • Edentulous space with no distal abutment.
  • Multiple edentulous space.
  • Bilateral edentulous space with more than 2 teeth missing on one side.
  • Insufficient number of abutments.
  • Severe edentulous ridge bone loss.
  • Patient with $\rightarrow$ advanced age. $\rightarrow$systemic health problem
Contra-Indicated in
  • Pt with large tongue
  • Pt with unfavorable response for R.P.D

II) Guidelines for Bridge Designing

  1. Abutment Selection
    • Abutment should be vital whenever possible….. BUT
      • If endodontically treated $\rightarrow$ it should be
        • i) asymptomatic
        • ii) good canal seal.
    • Failure occur if abutments have
      • i)short root ( improper C/R)
      • ii)little remaining tooth structure
    • Therefore: Added (secondary) abutment should be taken
    • Pulp capped teeth should not be used as FPD abutments $\rightarrow$ because of ↑ risk that they will require RCT later $\rightarrow$ therefore destruction of tooth structure and the retainers.
    • Abutment should have good periodontal condition + healthy attached gingival (3mm width at least).
    • Abutment should have $\rightarrow$ no mobility $\rightarrow$ proper C/R i.e 2/3 $\rightarrow$ proper root configuration.
    • Secondary(added) abutment:
      • Used in case of weak abutment or improper C/R
      • It should have proper C/R + ↑ root surface area + retentive retainer
      • WHY???
      • Because when pontic flexes $\rightarrow$ tensile forces will be applied to the retainer of the secondary abutment.
    • Terminal abutment:
      • It is preferable to end the bridge on a strong abutment and not on a weak one e.g upper lateral / lower central $\rightarrow$ therefore added abutment is needed i.e adjacent central incisors.
    • Third molar abutment:
      • Rarely used as abutments………..why?
        • i)They have short / fused root
        • ii)They usually show incomplete eruption
        • iii)They usually show mesial inclination due to absence of 7
        • iv)The unattached mucosal tissue that surround the distal of third molar will be inflamed even with well fitted crown.
    • Endodontically treated abutment:
      • Should not be used as abutment for cantilever or long span bridges$\rightarrow$ because ↑ torque will result in their fracture.(i.e used only for short span bridge)
      • Poor prognosis if endodontically treated teeth have short root or with canals that cannot allow placement of post (therefore better used to support RPD.
  2. Retainer Selection
  • Factors affecting retainer selection:
    • a)Alignment of abutments:
      • If the abutment teeth are not parallel $\rightarrow$ complete crown retainer with a common path of insertion will not be possible unless RCT is done.
    • SOLUTION:
      • i)Use partial coverage retainer
      • ii)Change bridge design.
    • b)Appearance:
      • All ceramic restorations have better esthetic than metal ceramic restoration.
      • According to clinician judgment $\rightarrow$ in some cases full coverage retainers may have better appearance than partial coverage or resin bonded bridge.
    • c) Condition of the abutment:
      • If abutment has intact facial surface / adequate height / and bulk$\rightarrow$ therefore partial coverage retainers can be used.
      • If the abutment has palatal enamel loss $\Rightarrow$ adhesive bridges (resin bonded retainers) should not be used.
      • If abutment has proximal caries $\Rightarrow$ therefore full coverage is recommended
    • d)Occlusion:
      • In case of heavy occlusal forces / deep bite $\rightarrow$ resin bonded retainers are contraindicated.
  1. Pontic Selection
  • Factors affecting pontic design selection:
    • a)Cleansability: (Biological)
      • Gingival aspect of pontic should be cleansable……. therefore $\rightarrow$
        • i)It should highly polished or glazed
        • ii)Metal ceramic junction should be away from the ridge surface of the pontic
        • iii)It should be convex.
      • Embrasure should be smooth and cleansable.
      • In posterior non esthetic area $\Rightarrow$ hygienic pontic is indicated
    • b)Appearance: (esthetic)
      • In esthetic areas $\rightarrow$ pontic should look like the tooth as possible $\Rightarrow$ modified ridge lap
        • ovate pontic (in case of recent extraction)
      • In posterior areas $\rightarrow$ compromise should be made between reasonable appearance and oral hygiene measures.
    • c)Strength (mechanical)
      • Pontics should be designed to withstand occlusal forces
      • ↑ span length$\rightarrow$ ↑ pontic occluso gingival height $\rightarrow$ use metallic pontic rather than metal ceramic one.
  1. Connector Selection
  • Connectors should be large to withstand occlusal forces but it should provide embrasure space for plaque control.
  • Rigid connector is usually used ………but non rigid connectors (e.g occlusal rest or key and keyway) are used in the following condition:
    • i)↓ load on the abutment
    • ii)Solve problems of malaligned abutments
  • In case of fixed supported bridge$\rightarrow$ the support must be placed on the anterior abutment with cast restoration (Inlay)
  • In case of multiple diastemas $\rightarrow$ fixed-fixed bridge can be used with palatal loop connector.
  1. Material Choice
  • a)Metal only $\rightarrow$ in non esthetic areas
    • $\rightarrow$ more conservative
  • b)Metal-ceramic $\rightarrow$ used when esthetic and strength are required.
    • $\Rightarrow$ veneered restoration is more conservative than full full veneered one
    • $\Rightarrow$ in case of deep bite$\Rightarrow$ insufficient space $\Rightarrow$ therefore veneered restoration is recommended
  • c)Non-metal only $\rightarrow$ in esthetic areas.
    • $\rightarrow$ recently new high strength ceramic material with improved mechanical properties are introduced.