Bridge Design Notes
Bridge Design
I) Selection of Prosthesis Type
- Missing teeth can be replaced by:
- Implant-supported F.P.D
- Tooth-supported F.P.D
- Conventional F.P.D
- Resin-bonded F.P.D
- Removable partial denture
Components of a Bridge
- Pontic: The artificial tooth that replaces the missing tooth.
- Abutment: The natural tooth that supports the bridge.
- Retainer: The restoration that attaches the pontic to the abutment.
- Connector: Connects the pontic to the retainer.
- Superstructure
- Substructure
- Preparation
- Framework
- Edentulous Ridge
- Span
- Wing
Types of Dentures
- Removable Complete Denture
- Removable Partial Denture
- Implant Over Denture
Deciding Factors for FPD/RPD Construction
- Length of Edentulous Area
- Number of missing teeth anteriorly.
- Number of missing teeth posteriorly.
- The effect of arch curvature in FPD design.
- Position of Edentulous Area
- Bounded or free-end saddle.
- Unilateral, bilateral, or multiple.
- Controversy regarding cantilever in restoring distal free-end edentulous area.
- Role of implant-supported restoration in the case of free-end saddle.
- Abutment Alignment
- Tilted abutment more than 25 degrees $\Rightarrow$ R.P.D
- Widely divergent abutment $\Rightarrow$ R.P.D
- Abutment Status and Periodontal Condition
- Vitality.
- Existing caries and remaining tooth structure.
- C/R ratio.
- Root configuration.
- Antes' Law.
- Mobility.
- Occlusion
- Adaptation.
- Deep bite and para-functional habits effect on FPD design and implant.
- Ridge Form
- Mild resorption.
- Moderate resorption.
- Severe resorption.
- General Factors
- Age.
- Systemic condition.
- Dry mouth.
- Tongue size.
- Gagging reflex.
- Patient attitude to RPD.
Treatment Plan Selection Sequence
- Implant is preferable if indicated at any situation.
- Resin-bonded bridge is the 2nd choice $\rightarrow$ to restore missing one tooth (except missing lower two centrals).
- From the 2nd premolar $\rightarrow$ R.B.Br comes after conventional designs because of ↓ retention and resistance.
- Conventional bridge design.
A ) Implant – Supported F.P.D
►Indication:
- Single tooth can be replaced with a single abutment $\rightarrow$ saving adjacent teeth from destructive preparation.
- Span length of 2$\rightarrow$6 teeth $\rightarrow$ replaced by multiple implants either $\rightarrow$ single –unit restoration $\rightarrow$ implant-supported F.P.D.
- In case of no distal abutment.
- Full arch can be replaced by implant-supported complete prosthesis.
- Sufficient alveolar bone density.
- In case of compromised abutment which can not support long span prosthesis.
- In dry mouth (better than natural teeth $\rightarrow$ otherwise caries).
B) Resin Bonded Tooth-Supported F.P.D
- Indication:
- i) Defect-free abutment.
- ii) Patient with bounded edentulous area (single tooth loss→except missing lower two centrals).
- iii) Edentulous ridge with moderate resorption $\rightarrow$ & no gross soft tissue defects.
- iv) sufficient enamel for bonding.
- v) Young pt with large pulp $\rightarrow$ because It is conservative within enamel.
- vi) Pt with normal bite. $\rightarrow$ i.e deep vertical overlap is contra-indicated.
C) Conventional Tooth-Supported F.P.D
- It is an artificial restoration spanning missing area in the dental arch.
- It is fabricated either from metal/non metal/combined material.
- It restore the masticating surface of posterior and anterior teeth.
Components of the bridge:
- Abutment
- It is the natural tooth/teeth or roots which support the bridge from both or one end.
- Retainer
- it is an artificial restoration rebuilding the prepared abutment tooth restoring function and esthetic + it retains the bridge in its position.
- Requirements of ideal retainer:
- it should constructed from material with high mechanical properties
- it provide good retention
- provide good esthetic if used in anterior area
- Requirements of ideal retainer:
- it is an artificial restoration rebuilding the prepared abutment tooth restoring function and esthetic + it retains the bridge in its position.
- Pontic
- it is the suspended from the bridge which restore the coronal portion of the missing tooth/teeh restoring function and esthetic.
- Connector
- it is that part of the bridge which connecting the retainer and the pontics . it is either :
- rigid connector
- non rigid connector.
- it is that part of the bridge which connecting the retainer and the pontics . it is either :
Types of Conventional Bridges
- a) Fixed–Fixed F.P.D:
- It is a F.P.D where retainer & pontic are soldered together at both end.
- b)Fixed–Supported F.P.D ( fixed – movable bridge)
- It is a F.P.D where retainer & pontic are soldered at one end while at the other end joined together by non-rigid connector.
- c)Fixed–Free F.P.D (cantilever)
- It is a F.P.D in which the pontic is fixed to one retainer while the other end is free.
- d)Spring cantilever
- It is a F.P.D where the pontic is at the end of resilient curved arm deriving its support from remote abutment.
- (used in case of diastema)
- e)Removable bridge: (Precision attachment bridge)
- It is a bridge in which the retainer consists of two parts $\rightarrow$ one cemented to the abutment tooth (coping) and one soldered/connected to the pontic (telescoping crowns).
- The two retainers are frictionally retained to each other.
- The bridge can be removed by the patient for cleaning purpose.
Indications
- In general fixed-fixed bridge is Indicated for:
- missing two teeth post. (maximum)
- missing four teeth ant. (maximum)
- according to periodontal membrane area ( ante´ s law)
- Otherwise $\rightarrow$ R.P.D
- In young patients because of large pulp size $\Rightarrow$ root canal treatment may be done.
D) R.P.D
Indicated for:
- Edentulous spaces greater than $\rightarrow$two post. Teeth $\rightarrow$four ant. Teeth.
- Edentulous space with no distal abutment.
- Multiple edentulous space.
- Bilateral edentulous space with more than 2 teeth missing on one side.
- Insufficient number of abutments.
- Severe edentulous ridge bone loss.
- Patient with $\rightarrow$ advanced age. $\rightarrow$systemic health problem
Contra-Indicated in
- Pt with large tongue
- Pt with unfavorable response for R.P.D
II) Guidelines for Bridge Designing
- Abutment Selection
- Abutment should be vital whenever possible….. BUT
- If endodontically treated $\rightarrow$ it should be
- i) asymptomatic
- ii) good canal seal.
- If endodontically treated $\rightarrow$ it should be
- Failure occur if abutments have
- i)short root ( improper C/R)
- ii)little remaining tooth structure
- Therefore: Added (secondary) abutment should be taken
- Pulp capped teeth should not be used as FPD abutments $\rightarrow$ because of ↑ risk that they will require RCT later $\rightarrow$ therefore destruction of tooth structure and the retainers.
- Abutment should have good periodontal condition + healthy attached gingival (3mm width at least).
- Abutment should have $\rightarrow$ no mobility $\rightarrow$ proper C/R i.e 2/3 $\rightarrow$ proper root configuration.
- Secondary(added) abutment:
- Used in case of weak abutment or improper C/R
- It should have proper C/R + ↑ root surface area + retentive retainer
- WHY???
- Because when pontic flexes $\rightarrow$ tensile forces will be applied to the retainer of the secondary abutment.
- Terminal abutment:
- It is preferable to end the bridge on a strong abutment and not on a weak one e.g upper lateral / lower central $\rightarrow$ therefore added abutment is needed i.e adjacent central incisors.
- Third molar abutment:
- Rarely used as abutments………..why?
- i)They have short / fused root
- ii)They usually show incomplete eruption
- iii)They usually show mesial inclination due to absence of 7
- iv)The unattached mucosal tissue that surround the distal of third molar will be inflamed even with well fitted crown.
- Rarely used as abutments………..why?
- Endodontically treated abutment:
- Should not be used as abutment for cantilever or long span bridges$\rightarrow$ because ↑ torque will result in their fracture.(i.e used only for short span bridge)
- Poor prognosis if endodontically treated teeth have short root or with canals that cannot allow placement of post (therefore better used to support RPD.
- Abutment should be vital whenever possible….. BUT
- Retainer Selection
- Factors affecting retainer selection:
- a)Alignment of abutments:
- If the abutment teeth are not parallel $\rightarrow$ complete crown retainer with a common path of insertion will not be possible unless RCT is done.
- SOLUTION:
- i)Use partial coverage retainer
- ii)Change bridge design.
- b)Appearance:
- All ceramic restorations have better esthetic than metal ceramic restoration.
- According to clinician judgment $\rightarrow$ in some cases full coverage retainers may have better appearance than partial coverage or resin bonded bridge.
- c) Condition of the abutment:
- If abutment has intact facial surface / adequate height / and bulk$\rightarrow$ therefore partial coverage retainers can be used.
- If the abutment has palatal enamel loss $\Rightarrow$ adhesive bridges (resin bonded retainers) should not be used.
- If abutment has proximal caries $\Rightarrow$ therefore full coverage is recommended
- d)Occlusion:
- In case of heavy occlusal forces / deep bite $\rightarrow$ resin bonded retainers are contraindicated.
- a)Alignment of abutments:
- Pontic Selection
- Factors affecting pontic design selection:
- a)Cleansability: (Biological)
- Gingival aspect of pontic should be cleansable……. therefore $\rightarrow$
- i)It should highly polished or glazed
- ii)Metal ceramic junction should be away from the ridge surface of the pontic
- iii)It should be convex.
- Embrasure should be smooth and cleansable.
- In posterior non esthetic area $\Rightarrow$ hygienic pontic is indicated
- Gingival aspect of pontic should be cleansable……. therefore $\rightarrow$
- b)Appearance: (esthetic)
- In esthetic areas $\rightarrow$ pontic should look like the tooth as possible $\Rightarrow$ modified ridge lap
- ovate pontic (in case of recent extraction)
- In posterior areas $\rightarrow$ compromise should be made between reasonable appearance and oral hygiene measures.
- In esthetic areas $\rightarrow$ pontic should look like the tooth as possible $\Rightarrow$ modified ridge lap
- c)Strength (mechanical)
- Pontics should be designed to withstand occlusal forces
- ↑ span length$\rightarrow$ ↑ pontic occluso gingival height $\rightarrow$ use metallic pontic rather than metal ceramic one.
- a)Cleansability: (Biological)
- Connector Selection
- Connectors should be large to withstand occlusal forces but it should provide embrasure space for plaque control.
- Rigid connector is usually used ………but non rigid connectors (e.g occlusal rest or key and keyway) are used in the following condition:
- i)↓ load on the abutment
- ii)Solve problems of malaligned abutments
- In case of fixed supported bridge$\rightarrow$ the support must be placed on the anterior abutment with cast restoration (Inlay)
- In case of multiple diastemas $\rightarrow$ fixed-fixed bridge can be used with palatal loop connector.
- Material Choice
- a)Metal only $\rightarrow$ in non esthetic areas
- $\rightarrow$ more conservative
- b)Metal-ceramic $\rightarrow$ used when esthetic and strength are required.
- $\Rightarrow$ veneered restoration is more conservative than full full veneered one
- $\Rightarrow$ in case of deep bite$\Rightarrow$ insufficient space $\Rightarrow$ therefore veneered restoration is recommended
- c)Non-metal only $\rightarrow$ in esthetic areas.
- $\rightarrow$ recently new high strength ceramic material with improved mechanical properties are introduced.