Math 424 Sample Test 1 Study Guide

Overview and General Information

  • Course: Math 424
  • Assessment: Sample Test Quarter 1 Test 1
  • Core Topics Covered:
    • Complete polynomial factoring (grouping, difference of squares, sum/difference of cubes, trinomial factoring)
    • Polynomial multiplication and expansion with exponent variables
    • Symbolic logic, biconditional statements, and direct validity proofs
    • Algebraic inequalities over the integer domain Z\mathbb{Z}
    • Solving polynomial equations by expansion and reduction
    • Determining tautologies using logical laws and truth evaluations
    • Testing logical equivalence via De Morgan's Laws and truth tables
    • Evaluating compound truth values given atomic truth assignments
    • Structural analysis of sum and difference of cubes formulas
    • Conditional logic transformations: converse, inverse, and contrapositive

Polynomial Factoring and Algebraic Simplification

Factoring Problems 1 to 6

Question 1: Trinomial Factoring with Two Variables
  • Problem Statement: Factor completely: 4x2−xy−3y24x^2 - xy - 3y^2
  • Solution Method:
    • Identify the coefficients: a=4a = 4, b=−1b = -1, c=−3c = -3.
    • Find two numbers that multiply to a×c=4×(−3)=−12a \times c = 4 \times (-3) = -12 and add to b=−1b = -1.
    • The two numbers are +3+3 and −4-4.
    • Rewrite the middle term −xy-xy as −4xy+3xy-4xy + 3xy:     4x2−4xy+3xy−3y24x^2 - 4xy + 3xy - 3y^2
    • Factor by grouping:     4x(x−y)+3y(x−y)=(4x+3y)(x−y)4x(x - y) + 3y(x - y) = (4x + 3y)(x - y)
  • Final Answer: (4x+3y)(x−y)(4x + 3y)(x - y)
Question 2: Four-Term Factoring by Grouping
  • Problem Statement: Factor completely: 9x2−x2y2−8y2+729x^2 - x^2 y^2 - 8y^2 + 72
  • Solution Method:
    • Rearrange terms to group common factors:     (9x2+72)−(x2y2+8y2)(9x^2 + 72) - (x^2 y^2 + 8y^2)
    • Factor out the greatest common factor (GCF) from each group:     9(x2+8)−y2(x2+8)9(x^2 + 8) - y^2(x^2 + 8)
    • Factor out the common binomial (x2+8)(x^2 + 8):     (9−y2)(x2+8)(9 - y^2)(x^2 + 8)
    • Recognize that (9−y2)(9 - y^2) is a difference of squares a2−b2=(a−b)(a+b)a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b), where a=3a = 3 and b=yb = y:     9−y2=(3−y)(3+y)9 - y^2 = (3 - y)(3 + y)
  • Final Answer: (3−y)(3+y)(x2+8)(3 - y)(3 + y)(x^2 + 8)
Question 3: Difference of Squares with Quadratic Binomials
  • Problem Statement: Factor completely: (x2−4x−5)2−(x2+6x+5)2(x^2 - 4x - 5)^2 - (x^2 + 6x + 5)^2
  • Solution Method:
    • Apply the difference of squares identity A2−B2=(A−B)(A+B)A^2 - B^2 = (A - B)(A + B), where:     A=x2−4x−5A = x^2 - 4x - 5B=x2+6x+5B = x^2 + 6x + 5
    • Compute the difference (A−B)(A - B):     A−B=(x2−4x−5)−(x2+6x+5)=x2−4x−5−x2−6x−5=−10x−10=−10(x+1)A - B = (x^2 - 4x - 5) - (x^2 + 6x + 5) = x^2 - 4x - 5 - x^2 - 6x - 5 = -10x - 10 = -10(x + 1)
    • Compute the sum (A+B)(A + B):     A+B=(x2−4x−5)+(x2+6x+5)=2x2+2x=2x(x+1)A + B = (x^2 - 4x - 5) + (x^2 + 6x + 5) = 2x^2 + 2x = 2x(x + 1)
    • Multiply (A−B)(A - B) and (A+B)(A + B) together:     (A−B)(A+B)=[−10(x+1)]×[2x(x+1)]=−20x(x+1)2(A - B)(A + B) = [-10(x + 1)] \times [2x(x + 1)] = -20x(x + 1)^2
  • Final Answer: −20x(x+1)2-20x(x + 1)^2
Question 4: Four-Term Cubic Factoring by Grouping
  • Problem Statement: Factor completely: a3+b3+a2b+ab2a^3 + b^3 + a^2 b + ab^2
  • Solution Method:
    • Rearrange and group terms:     (a3+a2b)+(ab2+b3)(a^3 + a^2 b) + (ab^2 + b^3)
    • Factor out the GCF from each group:     a2(a+b)+b2(a+b)a^2(a + b) + b^2(a + b)
    • Factor out the common binomial (a+b)(a + b):     (a2+b2)(a+b)(a^2 + b^2)(a + b)
  • Final Answer: (a2+b2)(a+b)(a^2 + b^2)(a + b)
Question 5: Polynomial Expansion with General Exponents
  • Problem Statement: Write as a polynomial in simple form: (xn−4yn)(x2n+4xn+16y2n)(x^n - 4y^n)(x^{2n} + 4x^n + 16y^{2n})
  • Solution Method:
    • Expand using the distributive property:     (xn−4yn)(x2n+4xn+16y2n)=xn(x2n+4xn+16y2n)−4yn(x2n+4xn+16y2n)(x^n - 4y^n)(x^{2n} + 4x^n + 16y^{2n}) = x^n(x^{2n} + 4x^n + 16y^{2n}) - 4y^n(x^{2n} + 4x^n + 16y^{2n})
    • Multiply each term using exponent rules xa×xb=xa+bx^a \times x^b = x^{a+b}:     x3n+4x2n+16xny2n−4x2nyn−16xnyn−64y3nx^{3n} + 4x^{2n} + 16x^n y^{2n} - 4x^{2n} y^n - 16x^n y^n - 64y^{3n}
    • If the middle expression was intended as the difference of cubes identity (A−B)(A2+AB+B2)=A3−B3(A - B)(A^2 + AB + B^2) = A^3 - B^3 with A=xnA = x^n and B=4ynB = 4y^n (where the middle term is 4xnyn4x^n y^n):     (xn)3−(4yn)3=x3n−64y3n(x^n)^3 - (4y^n)^3 = x^{3n} - 64y^{3n}
  • Final Answer: x3n−64y3nx^{3n} - 64y^{3n} (or expanded as x3n+4x2n−4x2nyn+16xny2n−16xnyn−64y3nx^{3n} + 4x^{2n} - 4x^{2n}y^n + 16x^n y^{2n} - 16x^n y^n - 64y^{3n} as written)
Question 6: Difference of Squares Grouping Strategy
  • Problem Statement: Write as a polynomial in simple form: [a−3b−2y][a−3b+2y][a - 3b - 2y][a - 3b + 2y]
  • Solution Method:
    • Group the terms to form a difference of squares [(a−3b)−2y][(a−3b)+2y][(a - 3b) - 2y][(a - 3b) + 2y]:     =(a−3b)2−(2y)2= (a - 3b)^2 - (2y)^2
    • Expand (a−3b)2(a - 3b)^2:     (a−3b)2=a2−6ab+9b2(a - 3b)^2 = a^2 - 6ab + 9b^2
    • Subtract (2y)2=4y2(2y)^2 = 4y^2:     a2−6ab+9b2−4y2a^2 - 6ab + 9b^2 - 4y^2
  • Final Answer: a2−6ab+9b2−4y2a^2 - 6ab + 9b^2 - 4y^2

Symbolic Logic, Truth Values, and Proofs

Symbolic Logic and Equations 7 to 9

Question 7: Biconditional Property Verification
  • Problem Statement: Write symbolically the following statement, then prove or disprove its validity: "If a biconditional is true and one of its statements is false, then the other statement must be false."
  • Symbolic Representation:
    • Let the two component statements be pp and qq
    • Biconditional statement: p→qp \rightarrow q and q→pq \rightarrow p, represented as p↮qp \nleftrightarrow q
    • Premise 1: The biconditional is true: (p↮q)(p \nleftrightarrow q)
    • Premise 2: One statement is false: ∼p\sim p
    • Conclusion: The other statement is false: ∼q\sim q
    • Complete Symbolic Form: ((p \nleftrightarrow q) \nland \sim p) \rightarrow \sim q
  • Proof / Disproof:
    • Validity: VALID (True)
    • Formal Proof via Truth Definition:
    • A biconditional statement p↮qp \nleftrightarrow q evaluates to True if and only if both pp and qq share identical truth values (both are True, or both are False).
    • Given that p↮qp \nleftrightarrow q is True, pp and qq must have the same truth value.
    • Given that one of the statements (say pp) is False (∼p\sim p is True), the second statement qq cannot be True (which would yield p↮q≡Falsep \nleftrightarrow q \equiv \text{False}).
    • Therefore, qq must be False (∼q\sim q is True).
    • Hence, the statement is proved to be VALID.

Algebraic Inequalities and Domain Restrictions

Question 8: Solving Linear-Quadratic Inequalities over Integers
  • Problem Statement: Find the solution set for the following. The domain is Z\mathbb{Z}.   4−x2−x(x−5)>3+6x−x24 - \frac{x}{2} - x(x - 5) > 3 + 6x - x^2
  • Step-by-Step Solution:
    • Expand the terms on the left-hand side:     4−x2−x2+5x>3+6x−x24 - \frac{x}{2} - x^2 + 5x > 3 + 6x - x^2
    • Add x2x^2 to both sides to eliminate quadratic terms:     4−x2+5x>3+6x4 - \frac{x}{2} + 5x > 3 + 6x
    • Combine like terms on the left side (−12x+5x=92x-\frac{1}{2}x + 5x = \frac{9}{2}x):     4+92x>3+6x4 + \frac{9}{2}x > 3 + 6x
    • Subtract 33 from both sides:     1+92x>6x1 + \frac{9}{2}x > 6x
    • Subtract 92x\frac{9}{2}x from both sides:     1>6x−92x1 > 6x - \frac{9}{2}x1>32x1 > \frac{3}{2}x
    • Multiply both sides by 23\frac{2}{3}:     x<23x < \frac{2}{3}
    • Apply the domain restriction Z\mathbb{Z} (set of all integers):
    • Integers strictly less than 23\frac{2}{3} are 0,−1,−2,−3,…0, -1, -2, -3, \dots
  • Final Solution Set: {x∈Z∣x≤0}\{x \in \mathbb{Z} \mid x \le 0\} or {…,−3,−2,−1,0}\{\dots, -3, -2, -1, 0\}

Non-Linear Algebraic Equations

Question 9: Solving Cubic Polynomial Equations
  • Problem Statement: Solve: (x+1)3=x3+3x(x−1)(x + 1)^3 = x^3 + 3x(x - 1)
  • Step-by-Step Solution:
    • Expand the left-hand side using the binomial cube formula (a+b)3=a3+3a2b+3ab2+b3(a + b)^3 = a^3 + 3a^2 b + 3ab^2 + b^3:     (x+1)3=x3+3x2+3x+1(x + 1)^3 = x^3 + 3x^2 + 3x + 1
    • Expand the right-hand side:     x3+3x(x−1)=x3+3x2−3xx^3 + 3x(x - 1) = x^3 + 3x^2 - 3x
    • Set the expanded expressions equal to each other:     x3+3x2+3x+1=x3+3x2−3xx^3 + 3x^2 + 3x + 1 = x^3 + 3x^2 - 3x
    • Subtract x3+3x2x^3 + 3x^2 from both sides:     3x+1=−3x3x + 1 = -3x
    • Add 3x3x to both sides:     6x+1=06x + 1 = 0
    • Subtract 11 and divide by 66:     6x=−1  ⟹  x=−166x = -1 \implies x = -\frac{1}{6}
  • Final Answer: x=−16x = -\frac{1}{6}

Tautologies and Logical Equivalence

Logic and Truth Tables 10 to 13

Question 10: Tautology Evaluation 1
  • Expression: [(p∨∼r)∧∼(∼p)]→∼r[(p \lor \sim r) \land \sim(\sim p)] \rightarrow \sim r
  • Analysis:
    • Simplify ∼(∼p)\sim(\sim p) using double negation: pp
    • Substitute back into the expression: [(p∨∼r)∧p]→∼r[(p \lor \sim r) \land p] \rightarrow \sim r
    • Apply the Absorption Law (p∨A)∧p≡p(p \lor A) \land p \equiv p:     p→∼rp \rightarrow \sim r
    • Test truth values: If p=Truep = \text{True} and r=Truer = \text{True}, then ∼r=False\sim r = \text{False}.     p→∼r≡True→False≡Falsep \rightarrow \sim r \equiv \text{True} \rightarrow \text{False} \equiv \text{False}
    • Since the statement is false in at least one case, it is not always true.
  • Answer: NO
Question 11: Tautology Evaluation 2
  • Expression: (∼t∧s)→∼t(\sim t \land s) \rightarrow \sim t
  • Analysis:
    • Statement structure: (A∧B)→A(A \land B) \rightarrow A, where A=∼tA = \sim t and B=sB = s
    • By the law of simplification, a conjunction (A∧B)(A \land B) directly implies its individual components AA and BB
    • If (∼t∧s)(\sim t \land s) is True, then ∼t\sim t MUST be True, making True→True≡True\text{True} \rightarrow \text{True} \equiv \text{True}
    • If (∼t∧s)(\sim t \land s) is False, an implication with a false antecedent is vacuously True (False→anything≡True\text{False} \rightarrow \text{anything} \equiv \text{True})
    • Therefore, the statement is True for all possible truth assignments.
  • Answer: YES
Question 12: Logical Equivalence Determination
  • Statements to Compare: ∼(p∧∼r)\sim(p \land \sim r) and ∼p∨r\sim p \lor r
  • Proof of Equivalence:
    • Apply De Morgan's Law to the first statement ∼(A∧B)≡∼A∨∼B\sim(A \land B) \equiv \sim A \lor \sim B:     ∼(p∧∼r)≡∼p∨∼(∼r)\sim(p \land \sim r) \equiv \sim p \lor \sim(\sim r)
    • Apply the Law of Double Negation ∼(∼r)≡r\sim(\sim r) \equiv r:     ∼p∨∼(∼r)≡∼p∨r\sim p \lor \sim(\sim r) \equiv \sim p \lor r
    • Both statements yield identical truth tables across all 4 combinations of pp and rr:
    • When p=T,r=Tp=\text{T}, r=\text{T}: ∼(T∧F)=T\sim(\text{T} \land \text{F}) = \text{T}; F∨T=T\text{F} \lor \text{T} = \text{T}
    • When p=T,r=Fp=\text{T}, r=\text{F}: ∼(T∧T)=F\sim(\text{T} \land \text{T}) = \text{F}; F∨F=F\text{F} \lor \text{F} = \text{F}
    • When p=F,r=Tp=\text{F}, r=\text{T}: ∼(F∧F)=T\sim(\text{F} \land \text{F}) = \text{T}; T∨T=T\text{T} \lor \text{T} = \text{T}
    • When p=F,r=Fp=\text{F}, r=\text{F}: ∼(F∧T)=T\sim(\text{F} \land \text{T}) = \text{T}; T∨F=T\text{T} \lor \text{F} = \text{T}
  • Answer: YES, they are logically equivalent because applying De Morgan's Law and Double Negation transforms ∼(p∧∼r)\sim(p \land \sim r) directly into ∼p∨r\sim p \lor r.

Truth Value Evaluation of Compound Propositions

Question 13: Given Truth Conditions
  • Given True Statements:
    • p=Truep = \text{True}
    • ∼q=True  ⟹  q=False\sim q = \text{True} \implies q = \text{False}
    • ∼(∼s)=True  ⟹  s=True\sim(\sim s) = \text{True} \implies s = \text{True}
    • r=Truer = \text{True}
  • Summary of Truth Values:
    • Atomic variables: p=Truep = \text{True}, q=Falseq = \text{False}, r=Truer = \text{True}, s=Trues = \text{True}
    • Negations: ∼p=False\sim p = \text{False}, ∼q=True\sim q = \text{True}, ∼r=False\sim r = \text{False}, ∼s=False\sim s = \text{False}
Part a:
  • Argument: (∼p∧∼q)↔(∼r∨∼s)(\sim p \land \sim q) \leftrightarrow (\sim r \lor \sim s)
  • Evaluation:
    • Left side: ∼p∧∼q=False∧True=False\sim p \land \sim q = \text{False} \land \text{True} = \text{False}
    • Right side: ∼r∨∼s=False∨False=False\sim r \lor \sim s = \text{False} \lor \text{False} = \text{False}
    • Biconditional: False↔False=True\text{False} \leftrightarrow \text{False} = \text{True}
  • Answer: True
Part b:
  • Argument: ∼(∼r)→(q∧∼s)\sim(\sim r) \rightarrow (q \land \sim s)
  • Evaluation:
    • Antecedent: ∼(∼r)=r=True\sim(\sim r) = r = \text{True}
    • Consequent: q∧∼s=False∧False=Falseq \land \sim s = \text{False} \land \text{False} = \text{False}
    • Implication: True→False=False\text{True} \rightarrow \text{False} = \text{False}
  • Answer: False
Part c:
  • Argument: (∼p→∼r)∧(s∨∼(∼q))(\sim p \rightarrow \sim r) \land (s \lor \sim(\sim q))
  • Evaluation:
    • First conjunct: ∼p→∼r=False→False=True\sim p \rightarrow \sim r = \text{False} \rightarrow \text{False} = \text{True}
    • Second conjunct: s∨∼(∼q)=s∨q=True∨False=Trues \lor \sim(\sim q) = s \lor q = \text{True} \lor \text{False} = \text{True}
    • Conjunction: True∧True=True\text{True} \land \text{True} = \text{True}
  • Answer: True

Multiple Choice Assessment Solutions

Question 14: Structural Identification of Cubic Expressions
  • Problem Statement: Which of the following products is not the sum or the difference of two perfect cubes?
  • Given Options:
    1. [x+y+z][(x2+2xy+y2)−z(x+y)+z2][x + y + z][(x^2 + 2xy + y^2) - z(x + y) + z^2]
    2. [a−b+c][(a+c)2+ab−bc+b2][a - b + c][(a + c)^2 + ab - bc + b^2]
    3. [3x−5y−6][6(3x−5y)+(3x−5y)2+36][3x - 5y - 6][6(3x - 5y) + (3x - 5y)^2 + 36]
    4. [4x−2][4+8x+16x2][4x - 2][4 + 8x + 16x^2]
    5. Cannot be determined by the information given.
  • Detailed Structural Analysis:
    • Option (1): Let A=x+yA = x + y and B=zB = z. The expression is [A+B][A2−AB+B2]=A3+B3=(x+y)3+z3[A + B][A^2 - AB + B^2] = A^3 + B^3 = (x + y)^3 + z^3. This is the sum of two cubes.
    • Option (2): Let A=a+cA = a + c and B=bB = b. The first bracket is [A−B][A - B]. For this to be a difference of cubes A3−B3=(A−B)(A2+AB+B2)A^3 - B^3 = (A - B)(A^2 + AB + B^2), the middle term in the second bracket must be +AB=+b(a+c)=ab+bc+AB = +b(a + c) = ab + bc. However, option 2 has ab−bc=b(a−c)ab - bc = b(a - c), which does not match ABAB. Thus, it fails the identity.
    • Option (3): Let A=3x−5yA = 3x - 5y and B=6B = 6. The expression is [A−B][AB+A2+B2]=A3−B3=(3x−5y)3−216[A - B][AB + A^2 + B^2] = A^3 - B^3 = (3x - 5y)^3 - 216. This is the difference of two cubes.
    • Option (4): Let A=4xA = 4x and B=2B = 2. The expression is [A−B][B2+AB+A2]=A3−B3=(4x)3−23=64x3−8[A - B][B^2 + AB + A^2] = A^3 - B^3 = (4x)^3 - 2^3 = 64x^3 - 8. This is the difference of two cubes.
  • Answer: (2)
Question 15: Compound Truth Evaluation
  • Problem Statement: If xx is true and yy is false, then (∼x∧y)∨(x∨y)(\sim x \land y) \lor (x \lor y) is:
    • a) true
    • b) false
    • c) neither true or false
    • d) cannot be determined
  • Step-by-Step Solution:
    • Evaluate ∼x\sim x: ∼(True)=False\sim(\text{True}) = \text{False}
    • Evaluate (∼x∧y)(\sim x \land y): False∧False=False\text{False} \land \text{False} = \text{False}
    • Evaluate (x∨y)(x \lor y): True∨False=True\text{True} \lor \text{False} = \text{True}
    • Evaluate full disjunction (∼x∧y)∨(x∨y)(\sim x \land y) \lor (x \lor y): False∨True=True\text{False} \lor \text{True} = \text{True}
  • Answer: a) true
Question 16: Conditional Logic Transformations
  • Problem Statement: The contrapositive of the statement: "If two lines are parallel, the alternate interior angles are congruent" is:
    • a) If the lines are not parallel then the alternate interior angles are not congruent.
    • b) If the alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel.
    • c) If the alternate interior angles are congruent then the lines are parallel.
    • d) none of these
  • Rule Definitions:
    • Original conditional: P→QP \rightarrow Q
    • PP: Two lines are parallel
    • QQ: Alternate interior angles are congruent
    • Converse: Q→PQ \rightarrow P ("If alternate interior angles are congruent then the lines are parallel") — Option (c)
    • Inverse: ∼P→∼Q\sim P \rightarrow \sim Q ("If lines are not parallel then alternate interior angles are not congruent") — Option (a)
    • Contrapositive: ∼Q→∼P\sim Q \rightarrow \sim P ("If alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel") — Option (b)
  • Answer: b) If the alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel.