Math 424 Sample Test 1 Study Guide
- Course: Math 424
- Assessment: Sample Test Quarter 1 Test 1
- Core Topics Covered:
- Complete polynomial factoring (grouping, difference of squares, sum/difference of cubes, trinomial factoring)
- Polynomial multiplication and expansion with exponent variables
- Symbolic logic, biconditional statements, and direct validity proofs
- Algebraic inequalities over the integer domain Z
- Solving polynomial equations by expansion and reduction
- Determining tautologies using logical laws and truth evaluations
- Testing logical equivalence via De Morgan's Laws and truth tables
- Evaluating compound truth values given atomic truth assignments
- Structural analysis of sum and difference of cubes formulas
- Conditional logic transformations: converse, inverse, and contrapositive
Polynomial Factoring and Algebraic Simplification

Question 1: Trinomial Factoring with Two Variables
- Problem Statement: Factor completely: 4x2−xy−3y2
- Solution Method:
- Identify the coefficients: a=4, b=−1, c=−3.
- Find two numbers that multiply to a×c=4×(−3)=−12 and add to b=−1.
- The two numbers are +3 and −4.
- Rewrite the middle term −xy as −4xy+3xy:
4x2−4xy+3xy−3y2
- Factor by grouping:
4x(x−y)+3y(x−y)=(4x+3y)(x−y)
- Final Answer: (4x+3y)(x−y)
Question 2: Four-Term Factoring by Grouping
- Problem Statement: Factor completely: 9x2−x2y2−8y2+72
- Solution Method:
- Rearrange terms to group common factors:
(9x2+72)−(x2y2+8y2)
- Factor out the greatest common factor (GCF) from each group:
9(x2+8)−y2(x2+8)
- Factor out the common binomial (x2+8):
(9−y2)(x2+8)
- Recognize that (9−y2) is a difference of squares a2−b2=(a−b)(a+b), where a=3 and b=y:
9−y2=(3−y)(3+y)
- Final Answer: (3−y)(3+y)(x2+8)
Question 3: Difference of Squares with Quadratic Binomials
- Problem Statement: Factor completely: (x2−4x−5)2−(x2+6x+5)2
- Solution Method:
- Apply the difference of squares identity A2−B2=(A−B)(A+B), where:
A=x2−4x−5B=x2+6x+5
- Compute the difference (A−B):
A−B=(x2−4x−5)−(x2+6x+5)=x2−4x−5−x2−6x−5=−10x−10=−10(x+1)
- Compute the sum (A+B):
A+B=(x2−4x−5)+(x2+6x+5)=2x2+2x=2x(x+1)
- Multiply (A−B) and (A+B) together:
(A−B)(A+B)=[−10(x+1)]×[2x(x+1)]=−20x(x+1)2
- Final Answer: −20x(x+1)2
Question 4: Four-Term Cubic Factoring by Grouping
- Problem Statement: Factor completely: a3+b3+a2b+ab2
- Solution Method:
- Rearrange and group terms:
(a3+a2b)+(ab2+b3)
- Factor out the GCF from each group:
a2(a+b)+b2(a+b)
- Factor out the common binomial (a+b):
(a2+b2)(a+b)
- Final Answer: (a2+b2)(a+b)
Question 5: Polynomial Expansion with General Exponents
- Problem Statement: Write as a polynomial in simple form: (xn−4yn)(x2n+4xn+16y2n)
- Solution Method:
- Expand using the distributive property:
(xn−4yn)(x2n+4xn+16y2n)=xn(x2n+4xn+16y2n)−4yn(x2n+4xn+16y2n)
- Multiply each term using exponent rules xa×xb=xa+b:
x3n+4x2n+16xny2n−4x2nyn−16xnyn−64y3n
- If the middle expression was intended as the difference of cubes identity (A−B)(A2+AB+B2)=A3−B3 with A=xn and B=4yn (where the middle term is 4xnyn):
(xn)3−(4yn)3=x3n−64y3n
- Final Answer: x3n−64y3n (or expanded as x3n+4x2n−4x2nyn+16xny2n−16xnyn−64y3n as written)
Question 6: Difference of Squares Grouping Strategy
- Problem Statement: Write as a polynomial in simple form: [a−3b−2y][a−3b+2y]
- Solution Method:
- Group the terms to form a difference of squares [(a−3b)−2y][(a−3b)+2y]:
=(a−3b)2−(2y)2
- Expand (a−3b)2:
(a−3b)2=a2−6ab+9b2
- Subtract (2y)2=4y2:
a2−6ab+9b2−4y2
- Final Answer: a2−6ab+9b2−4y2
Symbolic Logic, Truth Values, and Proofs

Question 7: Biconditional Property Verification
- Problem Statement: Write symbolically the following statement, then prove or disprove its validity: "If a biconditional is true and one of its statements is false, then the other statement must be false."
- Symbolic Representation:
- Let the two component statements be p and q
- Biconditional statement: p→q and q→p, represented as p↮q
- Premise 1: The biconditional is true: (p↮q)
- Premise 2: One statement is false: ∼p
- Conclusion: The other statement is false: ∼q
- Complete Symbolic Form: ((p \nleftrightarrow q) \nland \sim p) \rightarrow \sim q
- Proof / Disproof:
- Validity: VALID (True)
- Formal Proof via Truth Definition:
- A biconditional statement p↮q evaluates to True if and only if both p and q share identical truth values (both are True, or both are False).
- Given that p↮q is True, p and q must have the same truth value.
- Given that one of the statements (say p) is False (∼p is True), the second statement q cannot be True (which would yield p↮q≡False).
- Therefore, q must be False (∼q is True).
- Hence, the statement is proved to be VALID.
Algebraic Inequalities and Domain Restrictions
Question 8: Solving Linear-Quadratic Inequalities over Integers
- Problem Statement: Find the solution set for the following. The domain is Z.
4−2x−x(x−5)>3+6x−x2
- Step-by-Step Solution:
- Expand the terms on the left-hand side:
4−2x−x2+5x>3+6x−x2
- Add x2 to both sides to eliminate quadratic terms:
4−2x+5x>3+6x
- Combine like terms on the left side (−21x+5x=29x):
4+29x>3+6x
- Subtract 3 from both sides:
1+29x>6x
- Subtract 29x from both sides:
1>6x−29x1>23x
- Multiply both sides by 32:
x<32
- Apply the domain restriction Z (set of all integers):
- Integers strictly less than 32 are 0,−1,−2,−3,…
- Final Solution Set: {x∈Z∣x≤0} or {…,−3,−2,−1,0}
Non-Linear Algebraic Equations
Question 9: Solving Cubic Polynomial Equations
- Problem Statement: Solve: (x+1)3=x3+3x(x−1)
- Step-by-Step Solution:
- Expand the left-hand side using the binomial cube formula (a+b)3=a3+3a2b+3ab2+b3:
(x+1)3=x3+3x2+3x+1
- Expand the right-hand side:
x3+3x(x−1)=x3+3x2−3x
- Set the expanded expressions equal to each other:
x3+3x2+3x+1=x3+3x2−3x
- Subtract x3+3x2 from both sides:
3x+1=−3x
- Add 3x to both sides:
6x+1=0
- Subtract 1 and divide by 6:
6x=−1⟹x=−61
- Final Answer: x=−61
Tautologies and Logical Equivalence

Question 10: Tautology Evaluation 1
- Expression: [(p∨∼r)∧∼(∼p)]→∼r
- Analysis:
- Simplify ∼(∼p) using double negation: p
- Substitute back into the expression: [(p∨∼r)∧p]→∼r
- Apply the Absorption Law (p∨A)∧p≡p:
p→∼r
- Test truth values: If p=True and r=True, then ∼r=False.
p→∼r≡True→False≡False
- Since the statement is false in at least one case, it is not always true.
- Answer: NO
Question 11: Tautology Evaluation 2
- Expression: (∼t∧s)→∼t
- Analysis:
- Statement structure: (A∧B)→A, where A=∼t and B=s
- By the law of simplification, a conjunction (A∧B) directly implies its individual components A and B
- If (∼t∧s) is True, then ∼t MUST be True, making True→True≡True
- If (∼t∧s) is False, an implication with a false antecedent is vacuously True (False→anything≡True)
- Therefore, the statement is True for all possible truth assignments.
- Answer: YES
Question 12: Logical Equivalence Determination
- Statements to Compare: ∼(p∧∼r) and ∼p∨r
- Proof of Equivalence:
- Apply De Morgan's Law to the first statement ∼(A∧B)≡∼A∨∼B:
∼(p∧∼r)≡∼p∨∼(∼r)
- Apply the Law of Double Negation ∼(∼r)≡r:
∼p∨∼(∼r)≡∼p∨r
- Both statements yield identical truth tables across all 4 combinations of p and r:
- When p=T,r=T: ∼(T∧F)=T; F∨T=T
- When p=T,r=F: ∼(T∧T)=F; F∨F=F
- When p=F,r=T: ∼(F∧F)=T; T∨T=T
- When p=F,r=F: ∼(F∧T)=T; T∨F=T
- Answer: YES, they are logically equivalent because applying De Morgan's Law and Double Negation transforms ∼(p∧∼r) directly into ∼p∨r.
Truth Value Evaluation of Compound Propositions
Question 13: Given Truth Conditions
- Given True Statements:
- p=True
- ∼q=True⟹q=False
- ∼(∼s)=True⟹s=True
- r=True
- Summary of Truth Values:
- Atomic variables: p=True, q=False, r=True, s=True
- Negations: ∼p=False, ∼q=True, ∼r=False, ∼s=False
Part a:
- Argument: (∼p∧∼q)↔(∼r∨∼s)
- Evaluation:
- Left side: ∼p∧∼q=False∧True=False
- Right side: ∼r∨∼s=False∨False=False
- Biconditional: False↔False=True
- Answer: True
Part b:
- Argument: ∼(∼r)→(q∧∼s)
- Evaluation:
- Antecedent: ∼(∼r)=r=True
- Consequent: q∧∼s=False∧False=False
- Implication: True→False=False
- Answer: False
Part c:
- Argument: (∼p→∼r)∧(s∨∼(∼q))
- Evaluation:
- First conjunct: ∼p→∼r=False→False=True
- Second conjunct: s∨∼(∼q)=s∨q=True∨False=True
- Conjunction: True∧True=True
- Answer: True
Multiple Choice Assessment Solutions
Question 14: Structural Identification of Cubic Expressions
- Problem Statement: Which of the following products is not the sum or the difference of two perfect cubes?
- Given Options:
- [x+y+z][(x2+2xy+y2)−z(x+y)+z2]
- [a−b+c][(a+c)2+ab−bc+b2]
- [3x−5y−6][6(3x−5y)+(3x−5y)2+36]
- [4x−2][4+8x+16x2]
- Cannot be determined by the information given.
- Detailed Structural Analysis:
- Option (1): Let A=x+y and B=z. The expression is [A+B][A2−AB+B2]=A3+B3=(x+y)3+z3. This is the sum of two cubes.
- Option (2): Let A=a+c and B=b. The first bracket is [A−B]. For this to be a difference of cubes A3−B3=(A−B)(A2+AB+B2), the middle term in the second bracket must be +AB=+b(a+c)=ab+bc. However, option 2 has ab−bc=b(a−c), which does not match AB. Thus, it fails the identity.
- Option (3): Let A=3x−5y and B=6. The expression is [A−B][AB+A2+B2]=A3−B3=(3x−5y)3−216. This is the difference of two cubes.
- Option (4): Let A=4x and B=2. The expression is [A−B][B2+AB+A2]=A3−B3=(4x)3−23=64x3−8. This is the difference of two cubes.
- Answer: (2)
Question 15: Compound Truth Evaluation
- Problem Statement: If x is true and y is false, then (∼x∧y)∨(x∨y) is:
- a) true
- b) false
- c) neither true or false
- d) cannot be determined
- Step-by-Step Solution:
- Evaluate ∼x: ∼(True)=False
- Evaluate (∼x∧y): False∧False=False
- Evaluate (x∨y): True∨False=True
- Evaluate full disjunction (∼x∧y)∨(x∨y): False∨True=True
- Answer: a) true
- Problem Statement: The contrapositive of the statement: "If two lines are parallel, the alternate interior angles are congruent" is:
- a) If the lines are not parallel then the alternate interior angles are not congruent.
- b) If the alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel.
- c) If the alternate interior angles are congruent then the lines are parallel.
- d) none of these
- Rule Definitions:
- Original conditional: P→Q
- P: Two lines are parallel
- Q: Alternate interior angles are congruent
- Converse: Q→P ("If alternate interior angles are congruent then the lines are parallel") — Option (c)
- Inverse: ∼P→∼Q ("If lines are not parallel then alternate interior angles are not congruent") — Option (a)
- Contrapositive: ∼Q→∼P ("If alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel") — Option (b)
- Answer: b) If the alternate interior angles are not congruent then the lines are not parallel.