Many students feel nervous about upcoming exams, but reassurance that preparation will help ease anxieties.
Opportunities for additional learning through:
Video lectures (noting the benefit of watching at double speed).
Study guides and mind maps for organizing information.
Mind maps help illustrate connections between concepts, enhancing understanding.
Highlighting Kohlberg's contributions to moral development, with emphasis on criticisms of his model:
Moral reasoning does not always match moral actions (observed discrepancies).
Previous research shows a large minority of college students score at Level 5 on Kohlberg’s scale but may act contrary to their reasoning (e.g., cheating).
Relationship between cognitive development (IQ) and moral reasoning scores.
Kohlberg's original studies predominantly used male subjects, raising questions about gender bias in moral reasoning evaluations.
Carol Gilligan's alternative perspective on moral reasoning:
Introduced the care perspective, contrasting the justice perspective used by Kohlberg.
Emphasizes relationships and consideration over strict moral principles in women's moral reasoning.
Gilligan’s stages of moral perspective:
Preconventional: Focus on self-serving behavior (similar to Kohlberg's lowest level).
Conventional: Recognizing needs of others over self.
Postconventional: Balancing self and others' needs, promoting mutual benefit.
Importance of education in moral reasoning; educated women perform comparably to men on moral reasoning tests.
Children tend to form friendships with those who share similar backgrounds and characteristics:
Socioeconomic status, ethnicity, attractiveness, and popularity play roles in friendship choice.
Pretty Privilege: Physically attractive children may receive positive assumptions and form bonds with similarly attractive peers.
Shift from behavior-based friendships in early childhood to quality-based friendships in middle childhood.
Companionship Benefits:
Physical, cognitive, and emotional support through play and shared interests.
Ego support: Friends provide emotional backing during challenging social situations.
Development of affection and intimacy through mutual disclosure and emotional closeness among friends.
Increased trust leads to deeper friendships as children mature.
Sociometric Status: Method of ranking peers' popularity through 'likes' and 'dislikes.'
Popular children receive high 'I like you' votes and navigate social hierarchies.
High status vs. low status dynamics:
High status children's behaviors and possessions often dictate social norms within peer groups.
Low status children often emulate or aspire to high status peers.
Bullying prevalence in schools (10-15% admit to bullying).
Introduction of cyberbullying: extending bullying into the online realm, complicating interventions.
Interventions highlight the importance of socially adept peers intervening in bullying situations.
Utilization of technological interventions to prompt self-reflection before engaging in harmful speech online.
Shifts in family roles and dynamics in middle childhood:
Increase in dual-worker households with both parents working.
Rise in self-care children, who come home to an empty house after school.
Divorce rates, while prevalent, can sometimes result in positive adjustments for children.
More intergenerational and blended families leading to complex family dynamics (e.g., defining roles within stepfamilies).
Children from LGBTQ families demonstrate comparable or improved well-being to their peers from traditional family structures.