TC

Health Care Students and Digital Technology in Patient Care

  • Objective of the Study

    • Explore digital technology usage by undergraduate health care students in patient care during clinical placements.
  • Methodology

    • Conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines.
    • Searched four databases: CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, ERIC with assistance from a subject specialist librarian.
    • Reviewed 332 articles according to inclusion / exclusion criteria.
    • Evaluated 7 studies focusing on mobile learning and digital systems in patient care.
  • Key Themes Identified

    1. Student Learning Needs
    • Training deficits in electronic health records (EHR) left students unprepared; 61% felt unready for documentations.
    • Importance of integrating digital systems into curricula to match practical requirements.
    1. Access to Technology
    • Limited access to EHR systems hindered timely documentation; students often required supervision.
    • Mobile devices (PDAs) helped improve information accessibility but concerns over their reliability persisted.
    1. Perceptions of Technology Use
    • Students noted potential misperceptions from clinical staff about the use of PDAs as a sense of incompetence.
    • Conversely, immediate information access increased students' confidence and facilitated their integration into the care team.
    1. Impact on Patient Care
    • PDAs allowed nursing students to offer timely information to patients, improving care processes.
    • Some medical students felt technology could detract from patient interaction, emphasizing the need for balance.
  • Results

    • Included studies demonstrated varied usage of mobile technology and EHR.
    • Most reported positive learning experiences but highlighted barriers such as limited access and inadequate training.
    • Despite challenges, exposure to digital systems fostered a positive attitude towards learning.
  • Implications for Nursing Education

    • Need for curriculum adaptations to ensure digital literacy among students prior to clinical placements.
    • Encourage prior exposure to EHR systems to mitigate discomfort and boost confidence in their usage during practice.
    • Training for clinical supervisors is essential to better support students in utilizing digital technologies effectively.
  • Conclusion

    • Effective management of digital systems is vital for enhancing patient care quality and fostering student confidence.
    • Ongoing collaboration between educational institutions and health care organizations is needed to ensure students are well-prepared for modern digital environments.
  • Limitations

    • Limited research before 2015; findings primarily from nursing and medical students, possibly limiting generalizability to other healthcare professions.
  • Further Research Needed

    • Exploration of strategies to better integrate technology into clinical education and practice.
    • Examination of how curricula can adapt to meet the digital competencies outlined in the Jisc Digital Capability Framework
  • Quality Assessment of Included Studies

    • Mixed methodologies utilized; some studies scored higher based on clear data analysis and robust participant feedback.
    • Varied qualities observed in mixed-methods studies. Only one randomized controlled trial (moderate quality) was mentioned.
  • Key References

    • Baillie et al. (2013), Alegría et al. (2014), and all referenced works provide critical insights into student engagement with digital health systems in clinical contexts.
  • Suggested Strategies Going Forward

    • Develop simulated environments for students to practice using digital tools.
    • Address barriers to access and correlation between digital skills and improved patient outcomes.
    • Foster a culture of digital competency in clinical settings to better include students in patient care processes.