knowledge
Redemption and the Nature of the Mediator
Discussion on redemption and how the mediator works.
Questions posed about the mediator's identity and understanding of human nature.
Examination of different categories of redemption through thinkers like Anselm and Avila.
Exploration of the atonement and its implications.
Transition to Philosophical Queries
Introduction to the second section, focusing on Charles Taylor's question:
"What happens between 1500 and 2000 such that Christian faith transitions from being assumed to nearly unthinkable for many?"
Investigation of cultural and philosophical changes during this period.
Key themes for the afternoon discussion include:
Nature of faith.
Structure of knowledge.
Discussion Questions
Two main questions for consideration:
What are contemporary views on the relationship between faith and knowledge?
Insights from Calvin's "Institutes" and Anselm's "Proslogion" regarding faith and knowing God.
Initial thoughts include:
Faith often seen as lacking solid proof or evidence.
Divergence between faith and evidence, and discussion of synthesis between the two.
Contemporary Philosophy on Faith
Comments on contemporary philosophical perspectives:
Faith as belief without evidence (Quoted philosophers):
Richard Dawkins describes faith as a cop-out, an excuse to evade rational thought.
Bertrand Russell defines faith as a firm belief without evidence, contrasting it with knowledge tied to evidential proof.
The historical perspective contrasts with contemporary views:
In premodernity, faith is viewed as a type of knowledge, not merely a lack of evidence.
Epistemology Explained
Definition of epistemology as the study of knowledge; focus on:
Knowing subject (the knower).
Known object (what is being known).
Shift in epistemology:
Premodernity: Focus on ontology - knowing shaped by the nature of what exists.
Modernity: Focus shifts to the knowing subject's mental processes.
Knowledge Acquisition in Premodernity vs. Modernity
In premodern views:
Knowledge is diverse; different objects require different methods to know.
Example: Knowing a chemical property vs. knowing relational emotions (e.g., love).
Transition to modernity:
Knowledge becomes restricted to empirical methods, leading to skepticism about many forms of knowledge.
How epistemology's evolution impacts understanding of knowledge of God.
Implications for Faith and Knowledge of God
Scientific Method:
Inadequate for knowing God as God transcends empirical observation and measurement.
God described as:
Infinite, spiritual, non-empirical, and not a part of the universe.
Philosophical challenges for those who consider God's existence a scientific hypothesis:
The limitations of scientific methods in addressing divine existence.
Calvin’s Views on Knowing God
Reference to Calvin's insights: Knowledge of God comes through His works.
God known through general and special revelation (e.g., creation, Acts of God in history).
Calvin emphasizes:
God’s essence is infinite, and we understand Him only through His actions in the world.
Understanding Knowledge of God
God's nature explains:
Why we cannot fully comprehend God while still having knowledge of Him.
Importance of faith for acquiring knowledge about God.
Faith, as a gift from God, initiates true understanding.
Anselm's famous quote: "Faith seeks understanding."
Relationship Between Faith and Reason
Faith is rational even if its content surpasses natural human reason.
Knowledge of God stems from God's revelation, making it objectively understandable, despite being supernaturally endowed.
Takeaways and Reflections
Students encouraged to revisit notes to identify key insights and questions.
Emphasis on understanding faith and knowledge contextualized within the broader philosophical and cultural developments discussed.