Week 4 Study Notes on Scatterplots, Associations, and Correlation
Week 4 Overview
This week focuses on Scatterplots, Associations, and Correlation as explored in Chapter 6 of the textbook "Business Statistics" by Sharpe, Velleman, and Wright (Fourth Canadian Edition). The course is part of MATH 10008 - Statistics for Global Business Management.
Key Components for Relationship Analysis
To effectively analyze relationships between variables, we need to consider the following components:
Plot/Graph: Visualization tool to present the relationship between variables.
Characteristics to Describe: Identifying various attributes of the relationship to examine.
Measures of Characteristics: Quantifying the characteristics identified.
Inference Methods: Techniques to draw conclusions about the relationship.
Example Used: Investigating whether wine consumption results in a decrease in heart disease.
Response Variable: Death rate from heart disease (measures per 100,000 population).
Explanatory Variable: Wine consumption measured in liters per year per person.
This investigation highlights that we are dealing with bivariate analysis, a branch of statistics focusing on two variables.
Visualization and Description of Data
When examining scatterplots and data distributions, consider:
Form: Shapes like linear, curved, or cluster formations.
Direction: Connects to the trend line:
Positive: Indicates that as one variable increases, the other does as well.
Negative: Implies that as one variable increases, the other decreases.
Strength: Denotes how closely the points cling to the trend line.
Outliers: Points that deviate drastically from the pattern in the data.
Outliers can affect the strength assessment and must be analyzed critically.
Measuring the Strength of Relationships
To quantify the strength of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables, we utilize:
Standardized (z) values: Transforming each variable into a standard score for analysis.
Correlation Coefficient (r): This is defined as a measure of the direction (sign) and strength (magnitude) of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables.
It can take on values from to , where:
A value of 1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation.
A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative linear correlation.
A value of 0 indicates no linear correlation.
The formula for Pearson's correlation coefficient is given as:
Example of Correlation Evaluation
Example of correlation concerning wine consumption and heart disease:
A reported correlation value of indicates a strong inverse relationship.
Scatterplots and their Purpose
Scatterplots are a primary tool for visualizing associations between quantitative variables. An example presented is the correlation between the monthly Canadian/U.S. exchange rate and oil prices, alongside a discussion on correlation versus causation.
Key Note: Correlation does not imply causation. Just because two variables appear to be correlated (e.g., money wagered at US race tracks with a correlation ) does not confirm that one variable causes the change in the other.
Lurking Variables
Definition: Lurking variables are variables that have an effect on both studied variables but are not included in the analysis.
Examples:
A positive correlation between teachers' salaries and liquor sales does not imply that higher salaries cause increased liquor sales, indicating a need to explore other potential influences.
Health data such as life expectancy correlates with the number of doctors per person in various countries with a correlation of .
Correlation Tables
Correlation tables provide a compact summary of relationships across a set of variables. For instance, a table showing correlations among variable attributes for a sample of Amazon books, highlighting:
The correlation coefficients from the table illustrate the relationships, where for example:
#Pages and Thick have a significant positive correlation of .
Practical Application of Correlation Analysis
A series of analyses and quizzes following the correlation methodology report statistics:
Example Analyses include:
Score and Time Spent: A correlation coefficient calculated at approximately suggests a negligible relationship.
Time to Due Date and Score: Another weak correlation noted at .
Transforming Scatterplots to Assess Correlation
In practice, when scatterplots show non-linear associations, transformations are applied to make correlations more linear.
Logarithmic Transformation: As shown in an example from Germany's solar power cost data from 2009-2013 demonstrating increased linear association after transformation.
Caution: When interpreting transformed data, one must ensure clarity in representation to avoid misrepresentation of findings.
Homework and Practice
Homework involves preparing a data report related to scatterplots, associations, and correlation analysis as outlined in Assignment 5, detailing tutorials and practical activities related to Chapter 6 on these topics.