Unit 1: Writing at University Level
Session 1: Communicating Through Speech and Writing
Writing at university and in professional contexts requires clarity and conciseness; exposition is central to this course.
Distinguish oral vs written communication:
Oral features: pronouns (I, you, we), contractions, immediate feedback, markers (ok?, you follow?), slang, hedges, speech markers (so, well), fewer punctuation cues, fast/unplanned delivery, possible sentence fragments.
Written features: formal language, strict grammar, longer precise terms (e.g., vs. car), no contractions, avoid slang, impersonal tone (limited use of first person; third person preferred; you rarely used in formal writing), careful coherence and structure.
Registers (formal vs informal) and communicative competence:
Ability to select an appropriate register for context.
Joos\' five clocks: Frozen, Deliberative, Consultative, Casual, Intimate.
Codeswitching can occur in speech; formal, standard language required in writing.
Language and professional advancement: effective communication supports career success.
Summary takeaway: Writing is a formal, standardized mode that requires awareness of register, audience, and coherence to convey information clearly.
Session 2: Writing in the Academic Context: Expository and other Modes of Writing
Four main writing modes at the tertiary level: modes are Exposition, Argumentation, Technical, Narrative.
Expository writing:
Purpose: inform, explain, describe, or define information about a topic or process.
Key qualities: clarity, coherence (paragraphs tied to a single point; logical order between paragraphs), credibility, and objectivity.
Core attributes of the four modes (summary):
Exposition: Purpose — communicate information for explanation; Audience — seeking information; Language — formal, standard, objective.
Argumentative: Purpose — support a controversial view; Audience — consider opposing views; Language — can be formal or informal; emotive elements allowed.
Narrative: Purpose — convey human experience; Audience — share imaginative/dramatic truth; Language — descriptive, can be formal/informal.
Technical: Purpose — deliver technical information; Audience — specialists; Language — formal, impersonal, with technical jargon.
Language registers and category framework:
Five registers (Joos/Jago): Frozen, Deliberative, Consultative, Casual, Intimate; and the broader formal vs informal distinction.
Codeswitching: common in speech; writing should adhere to formal, standard language.
Brainstorming: a preparatory technique to organize ideas and determine content order before writing.
Methods of exposition (five options): , , , , .
The structure of an expository essay:
Introduction: identify topic, provide background, state significance, present thesis (focus and method).
Body: paragraphs with a clear main point (topic sentence) and supporting details; typically around paragraphs in exam settings.
Conclusion: restate main points, reinforce thesis; no new information.
Sample and comparisons:
Distinguish passages A–D by their purpose (storytelling vs technical vs issue-based vs argument-based).
Readership and writing levels: different documents target different audiences and require appropriate levels of technicality and formality (e.g., daily newspapers vs PhD theses).
Wrap-up: Expository writing is one of main modes; it requires coherence, credibility, and objectivity; brainstorming and appropriate structure are essential.
Session 3: Structuring the Expository Essay
Expository writing in higher education spans disciplines (math, engineering, literature) and centers on decision-making about topic, audience, and method.
Learning goals for this session:
Outline preparatory tasks and provide rationale.
Choose suitable brainstorming technique.
Identify main exposition methods.
Identify and describe main parts of the expository essay.
Evaluate sample expository essays.
Preparatory tasks before writing:
Topic: determine scope (broad vs specific); assess sufficiency of knowledge; consider level of generality.
Knowledge: ensure adequate understanding; avoid unfounded information.
Sources: use verifiable, authoritative sources; verify facts beyond a single source when possible.
Audience: tailor content to context, time constraints, and reader needs; example mappings of readership to writing level exist (e.g., general audience vs technical readers).
Time: plan writing schedule.
Topic and scope considerations:
A broad topic grants flexibility; a narrowly defined topic requires targeted information.
Uninformed writers lose credibility; fill in knowledge gaps for the audience.
Sources and verification:
Internet as a key resource; evaluate for soundness and relevance; cross-check against other sources.
Audience and purpose:
Tailor information to audience needs and constraints; different readerships demand different levels of detail and language.
Brainstorming and planning:
Use brainstorming to generate and organize significant points; organize content before drafting.
Five methods of exposition (recap): , , , , .
Essay organization overview:
Introduction, Body, Conclusion with a logical progression linking ideas.
Introduction should present topic, background, significance, and thesis; body develops main points; conclusion summarizes without introducing new information.
The expository essay sample: “Factors in Choosing a Career” demonstrates analysis by division and shows how a thesis guides paragraph organization.
Writing quality indicators (from activities):
Clear topic identification, purposeful thesis, well-developed paragraphs, precise language, coherent progression, and a strong conclusion.
Wrap-up and takeaway:
Expository essays require careful topic selection, credible sources, audience awareness, and clear structure; the next unit will focus more deeply on the thesis statement.