POLISCI2000 - 9/30/26
Comparative Politics
Central-Regional Power Distribution
Unitary - oldest and most common type
powerful central gov’t, weaker regional gov’t
most important policy decisions made at central level
Federal - U.S. model
Central and regional gov’ts share some powers and responsibilities
policy decisions are made at both central and regional levels
National Regional Power Distribution
Confederal - not very strong or lasting in modern times
powerful regional gov’t, weaker central gov’t
Most important policy decisions made at regional level
Executive-Legislative Relations
Three Major Types:
Parliamentary - oldest type
presidential - U.S. is prototype
Semi-presidential - hybrid form
Differences in:
separation of powers
executive selection
executive roles
Parliamentary - most common type
Legislatures select executive leadership
Executives can be removed by votes of no confidence
executives and legislative powers are combined
executive called prime minister - selects cabinet ministers
prime minister head of government
someone else head of state
Presidential - newer, less common
executive and legislature elected in separate elections for fixed terms of office
executives cannot be removed by vote of no confidence
executive and legislative power separate
executive called president
president head of government and head of state
Semi-Presidential - past 50 years
executive and legislature elected separately
presidents have fixed terms, prime minister subject to vote confidence
president holds power independent of legislature, yet also shares powers with prime minister
president head of state and takes on ceremonial and international roles prime ministers head of government
Benefits
Parliamentary systems seen as more efficient, more accountable to voters
vote of no confidence can call for early elections
Presidential systems allow more input for national leader selection - national mandate
can create national support for policy initiatives
Weakness
Parliamentary
Policy more top down form PM and Cabinet - less representation for minority parties
Presidential
Can create divided gov’t → gridlock → no policy action getting done
Executives
Executive branch carries out the laws of the state
Head of state - symbolic representation og state and nation - may be elected or hereditary monarch
Head of government - in charge of everyday running of the stae
cabinet - advisors, department overseers
collegial (parliamentary says)
advisory (presidential says)
unicameral - one chamber - usually small country and unitary system
bicameral - two chambers - usually larger country and federal system
upper house - frequently seen as “check” on lower house - longer terms - reps regions or classes
lower house - frequently seen as more changing and unpredictable - shorter terms - reps population
pros
unicameral
swifter action to address problems or concerns
“better” representation - represent population
bicameral
more deliberative action → more stability of policy
more varied type of representation
cons
Unicameralism
policy may shift dramatically over a short period of time
difficult to administer
bicameralism
policy may shift too slowly - cannot address problems of society
may not be truly representative of population
Judiciaries
democratic systems have rule of law - courts rule on how law is administered and interpreted
constitutional courts - top of judicial hierarchies
judicial review = authority to determine laws’ compatibility with state constitution
concrete review = only when triggered by court case
abstract review = at anytime w or w/o case
Bureaucracies
Administrative arm of the state - help execute policy
an inevitable product og complex society and government
modern bureaucracies tend to feature:
division of labor - break down complex tasks into simpler jobs
Hierarchy of authority - chain of command
framework of rules - rules dictate action and decision
impersonality - merit-based selection, civil service, technical qualifications