Recording-2025-02-17T04:06:27.540Z

Participant Ethical Considerations

  • Conduct interviews with participants post-study to discuss their experiences.

  • Important to inform participants of any undisclosed purpose of the study, especially concerning mental or physical stress related to participation.

Professional Ethics in Research

  • Professional organizations have formal codes of ethics that outline acceptable and unacceptable behaviors.

  • The American Sociological Association has specific requirements for sociologists to follow and adhere to.

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

  • IRBs are established to ensure research ethics and uphold standards in studies involving human subjects.

  • Mandated by the National Research Act of 1974 for all institutions conducting research.

ASU Research Approval Process

  • Research conducted at ASU must receive approval from the ASU IRB when involving human subjects for instructional purposes.

  • Researchers must fill out an application detailing the population and purpose of the research.

  • Faculty members must serve as the primary investigators for theses and dissertations needing IRB approval.

Historical Context of Research Ethics

  • The IRB approval process gained attention after significant studies highlighted ethical concerns.

  • Example: In 02/2009, researchers aimed to avoid undue harm during participant studies, deciding that a certain level of volts in experiments would be acceptable.

  • A notable study referenced is Milgram's obedience experiment conducted in 1971, which sparked debate about ethical treatment in psychological research, with Zimbardo being inspired by Milgram’s findings.