Knowledge Production

KINE 1000: Whose Knowledge Counts? 2025/26

General Information
  • Transcript dated 2025/26.

  • Restricted distribution: Do not distribute or upload to OpenAI without permission (Nakamura, 2026).

Agenda Overview

  • Announcements

  • New Unit: Whose Knowledge Counts?

    • Exploration of the following key questions:

    • How is knowledge produced?

    • What knowledge counts?

    • Who gets to produce knowledge?

    • What is studied/researched?

Educational Tools

Mind Map

  • Students will have access to:

    • A list of key terms.

    • A pre-drawn mind map that will have empty bubbles for students to fill out.

    • Reference material available in eClass.

Review of Key Concepts

  • Previous units included discussions on:

    • Critical Thinking

    • Sociological Imagination

    • Settler Colonialism

    • Race, Racialization, and Identities

    • Othered Bodies

How is Knowledge Produced?

  • Qualitative Research Methods:

    • Focuses on understanding phenomena through the meanings attributed by people.

    • Methods include:

    • Observation

    • Interviews

    • Fieldwork

  • Quantitative Research Methods:

    • Employs statistical or mathematical analyses of data.

    • Examples include:

    • Polls

    • Surveys

    • Questionnaires

  • Mixed Methods:

    • Incorporates both qualitative and quantitative research approaches.

    • Generally involves a smaller sample size than purely quantitative studies.

What Knowledge Counts?

  • Objectivity:

    • Defined as the distance between the researcher and the object of study.

    • Greater distance is perceived to enhance objectivity.

    • Assumption: The greater the distance, the more objective research outputs are presumed.

What Knowledge Doesn’t Count?

  • Subjectivity:

    • Defined as the values, assumptions, feelings, and thoughts that researchers carry regarding their study subjects.

  • Bias:

    • Refer to unintended errors in the research process or interpretation caused by researchers' preconceptions or expectations.

Objectivity as Ideal: Risks

  • Assumptions:

    • The assumption that objectivity is entirely possible is critiqued.

    • The belief that a neutral position is achievable is questioned.

    • Research is conducted by humans, inherently influenced by:

    • Political contexts

    • Economic factors

    • Social dynamics

    • Cultural influences

    • Power relations

The Politics of Research: Who Gets to Produce Knowledge?

  • Referencing the film "Picture a Scientist" to explore the dynamics around who has the authority to produce knowledge.

The Politics of Research: What is Worth Studying?

  • Questions raised regarding the value of certain topics:

    • Example: Anatomy of male (penis) versus female (clitoris) reproductive systems.

    • Note by O’Connell (2020) highlighting the ongoing underrepresentation of female biology in scientific literature.

The Politics of Research: What is Studied?

  • Definition of the object of study as a 'problem to be solved.'

    • Exploring themes related to Indigenous Peoples and people of color in research.

    • Critiques of a top-down approach to research, often resulting in Othering.

    • Research perspectives influenced by imperialist and colonialist viewpoints.

The Politics of Research: Imperialism and Colonialism

  • Discussion on how research has been justified through imperialism and settler colonialism.

    • Historical support for scientific endeavors.

    • Discussion on objects of study in popular media (e.g., "Black Panther" (2018) museum scene).

    • Role of research funding in supporting imperialistic narratives, aiding in the establishment of museums and exhibits.

Example: Colonization of Tasmania, Science, and Truganini

  • Historical Context:

    • Expedition of Captain James Cook in 1769 resulting in the British claim over Australia and New Zealand.

    • Effects on Aboriginal populations in Tasmania, leading to devastation.

    • Truganini (1812-1876) as the last known “full-blooded native Tasmanian” (Harari, 2011).

Canadian Context: Indigenous People

  • Impact:

    • Indigenous communities have often been subjected to research, resulting in widespread distrust towards researchers, healthcare providers, and educational institutions.

Indigenous Research Methodologies & Community-Based Research

  • Formation of Indigenous Research Ethics Boards.

  • Example: York’s Guidelines for Research Involving Aboriginal/Indigenous Peoples.

  • Emphasis on the principles of community-based research and strengths-based approaches.

Practice Questions

Multiple Choice and Essay Questions
  1. MCQ Topic: Outcome of objectivity in knowledge production.

    • Limits research topics and questions.

    • Results in nuanced qualitative research outputs.

    • Reinforces researcher neutrality assumptions.

    • Aids in obtaining funding for research.

  2. Essay Question: Define Othering and analyze how knowledge production may contribute to the process using sources including:

    • Batelaan (2022)

    • BBC Reel (2020)

    • Lecture materials from this unit and one additional unit.

References

  • Cheney, I (Director/Producer), Shattuck, S. (Director/Producer), & Pottle, M. (Producer) (2020). Picture a Scientist. [Film]. Uprising Productions.

  • Feiger, K. (Producer), & Coogler, R. (Director) (2018). Black Panther [Film]. US: Marvel Studio, Walt Disney.

  • Gray, H. (1910). Anatomy, descriptive and applied. (18th ed., thoroughly rev. and re-edited with additions by Edward Anthony Spitzka). Lea & Febiger.

  • Harari, Y.N. (2011). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Vintage.

  • O’Connell, H.E. (2020). Moving from critical clitoridectomy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13243

  • Sound, D. (2013). Residential school students subjected to food experiments. Retrieved from http://aptnnews.ca/2013/07/18/residential-school-students-subjected-to-food-experiments/

  • Restrictions reiterated: Do not distribute or upload to OpenAI without permission (Nakamura, 2026).