Vision and Road Accident Contribution Analysis of Road Accident Contributory Factors
Relationship Between Vision and Road Safety
- Inquiry into Vision's Contribution: One of the central questions in road safety is the extent to which poor vision contributes to traffic accidents.
- Importance of Visual Data: Driving is predominantly a visual task. It is estimated that "90% of information received whilst driving is visual."
- Evidence and Enforcement: Strong evidence linking inadequate vision to accidents is required to support the enforcement of specific "vision standards for driving."
- Significance of Factors: If poor vision is established as a contributor to unsafe driving, researchers must determine the relative importance of this factor compared to others.
- Pre-Licensing Medical Checks: Vision is notably the only "medical/health" check that is performed routinely on drivers in the UK before they are granted a license.
Historical Data of UK Traffic Accidents
- Accident Trends (1926–2013):
- 1926:
- Number of motor vehicles: 1.7×106
- Total accidents: 124,000
- Total casualties: 139,000
- Total fatalities: 4,886
- 1966:
- Number of motor vehicles: 12×106
- Total accidents: 292,000
- Total casualties: 392,000
- Total fatalities: 7,985
- 2013:
- Number of motor vehicles: 35×106
- Total accidents: 139,000
- Total casualties: 184,000
- Total fatalities: 1,713
Data Collection Methodology: Contributory Factors (CF)
- Department for Transport (DfT) Reporting: Since 2005, the DfT has collected data regarding "contributory factors" (CF) alongside standard accident numbers.
- The Reporting Process:
- A report form is completed by the attending police officer for each recorded accident.
- The form includes details regarding the vehicles and casualties involved.
- Nature of the Data:
- The data relies on the subjective judgment of the reporting police officer.
- Officers can assign several different factors to each of the participants (drivers, pedestrians, or cyclists) involved in the accident.
- Factor Classification:
- There are 77 possible factors organized into 9 different categories.
- Examples of factors include road conditions (e.g., spray, obstacles in the road), driver error (e.g., misjudged distance), and vehicle condition (e.g., faulty brakes).
- 2008 Data Overview:
- Total accident reports: 170,000
- Vehicles involved: 310,000
- Total casualties: 230,000
Top 10 Reported Contributory Factors (2014–2018)
- Driver/Rider failed to look properly: Represents the most common factor.
- 2014: 53,259 (46%)
- 2015: 49,871 (46%)
- 2016: 44,557 (44%)
- 2017: 37,896 (41%)
- 2018: 33,897 (40%)
- Driver/Rider failed to judge other person’s path or speed:
- 2014: 27,551 (24%)
- 2015: 25,245 (23%)
- 2016: 22,774 (23%)
- 2017: 20,289 (22%)
- 2018: 18,047 (21%)
- Driver/Rider careless, reckless or in a hurry:
- 2014: 20,883 (18%)
- 2015: 20,006 (18%)
- 2016: 18,175 (18%)
- 2017: 13,852 (15%)
- 2018: 13,203 (16%)
- Poor turn or manoeuvre:
- 2014: 18,916 (16%)
- 2015: 18,378 (17%)
- 2016: 16,119 (16%)
- 2017: 12,768 (14%)
- 2018: 11,025 (13%)
- Loss of control:
- 2014: 15,350 (13%)
- 2015: 13,966 (13%)
- 2016: 12,208 (12%)
- 2017: 10,830 (12%)
- 2018: 9,232 (11%)
- Pedestrian failed to look properly:
- 2014: 10,888 (9%)
- 2015: 10,113 (9%)
- 2016: 8,782 (9%)
- 2017: 7,928 (9%)
- 2018: 7,182 (8%)
- Slippery road (due to weather):
- 2014: 9,802 (8%)
- 2015: 8,312 (8%)
- 2016: 7,709 (8%)
- 2017: 7,501 (8%)
- 2018: 6,153 (7%)
- Travelling too fast for conditions:
- 2014: 7,921 (7%)
- 2015: 7,531 (7%)
- 2016: 6,595 (7%)
- 2017: 6,090 (7%)
- 2018: 5,048 (6%)
- Exceeding speed limit:
- 2014: 5,387 (5%)
- 2015: 5,351 (5%)
- 2016: 5,158 (5%)
- 2017: 4,880 (5%)
- 2018: 4,727 (6%)
- Sudden braking:
- 2014: 8,768 (8%)
- 2015: 7,453 (7%)
- 2016: 6,768 (7%)
- 2017: 5,723 (6%)
- 2018: 4,606 (5%)
- Total Number of Reported Accidents:
- 2014: 115,673
- 2015: 108,211
- 2016: 100,296
- 2017: 93,125
- 2018: 84,968
- Specific factors assigned to accidents in 2018 (Fatal / Total):
- Uncorrected/defective eyesight: 3 fatal accidents; 196 total accidents reported.
- Dazzling sun: 27 fatal accidents; 2,643 total accidents reported.
- Dazzling headlights: 8 fatal accidents; 269 total accidents reported.
- Visor or windscreen scratched/dirty: 3 fatal accidents; 118 total accidents reported.
- Pedestrian wearing dark clothes at night: 66 fatal accidents; 697 total accidents reported.
- Rider wearing dark clothing: 6 fatal accidents; 408 total accidents reported.
Analyzing the Absence of Vision in Accident Statistics
- Potential Explanations for Low Vision-Related CF Reports:
- Does it mean vision is not important, implying regulations should be relaxed?
- Does it indicate that current regulations are highly effective, screening out almost everyone who is dangerous?
- Could vision be a more significant factor in less serious accidents that are not captured in these specific reports?
- Is the low prevalence due to police officers not intuitively considering vision as a possible cause of the collision?
Supplemental Evidence on Visual Impact
- Diminished Vision for All Drivers: At night, every driver effectively has poor vision due to lighting constraints. This correlates with a fatality rate that is 3× greater at night than during the day.
- Experimental Performance Effects: Studies have demonstrated that blurred vision negatively affects driver performance, even if this does not always culminate in a reported accident.
- Reaction Times: Blurred vision is specifically linked to longer reaction times, which is exacerbated in low light or low contrast environments.
Research Perspectives: Hawley et al.
- Alternative Framework: Hawley et al. utilized the same DfT CF data but reached different conclusions by redefining existing categories.
- Re-categorization: They considered "Failed to Look" (FTL) and "Failed to Judge" (FTJ) to be "vision-related" factors.
- Demographic Findings: Their analysis showed that older drivers are more likely to be involved in accidents related to health (ID) and vision.
- Frequency Recommendations: Based on their findings, they suggested that younger drivers require an eye exam every 5 years, while older drivers should have one every 2 years.
Legal Powers and Licensing Revocation
- Police Authority: Law enforcement officers have the power to request an urgent revocation of a person's driving license through the Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA).
- Basis for Revocation: This occurs if an officer believes that allowing the driver to remain on the road would put the safety of other road users at risk.
- Increased Awareness: The existence of this protocol may serve to make police officers more conscious of vision as a potential contributory factor during accident investigations.