AP Gov Midyear
UNIT 1:
Foundations of
American Democracy
The U.S. Constitution arose out of important historical and
philosophical ideas and preferences regarding popular sovereignty
and limited government. Compromises were made during the
Constitutional Convention and ratification debates, and these
compromises have frequently been the source of conflict
in U.S. politics over the proper balance between individual
freedom, social order, and equality of opportunity.
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
LOR-1: A balance between
governmental power and
individual rights has been
a hallmark of American
political development.
BIG IDEA:
Liberty and Order
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
LOR-1.A: Explain how
democratic ideals are
reflected in the Declaration
of Independence and the
U.S. Constitution.
LOR-1.A.1: The U.S. government is based on ideas of limited
government, including natural rights, popular sovereignty,
republicanism, and social contract.
LOR-1.A.2: The Declaration of Independence, drafted by Jefferson
with help from Adams and Franklin, provides a foundation for popular
sovereignty, while the U.S. Constitution drafted at the Philadelphia
convention led by George Washington, with important contributions from
Madison, Hamilton, and members of the “grand committee,” provides the
blueprint for a unique form of political democracy in the U.S.
LOR-1.B: Explain how
models of representative
democracy are visible in
major institutions, policies,
events, or debates in the
U.S.
LOR-1.B.1: Representative democracies can take several forms along this
scale:
w Participatory democracy, which emphasizes broad participation in politics
and civil society
w Pluralist democracy, which recognizes group-based activism by
nongovernmental interests striving for impact on political decision making
w Elite democracy, which emphasizes limited participation in politics and civil
society
LOR-1.B.2: Different aspects of the U.S. Constitution, as well as the
debate between the Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1, reflect the
tension between the broad participatory model and the more filtered
participation of the pluralist and elite models.
LOR-1.B.3: The three models of representative democracy continue to be
reflected in contemporary institutions and political behavior.
CON-1: The Constitution
emerged from the debate
about the weaknesses in the
Articles of Confederation
as a blueprint for limited
government.
BIG IDEA:
Constitutionalism
CON-1.B: Explain the
relationship between key
provisions of the Articles
of Confederation and the
debate over granting the
federal government greater
power formerly reserved to
the states.
CON-1.A: Explain how
Federalist and Anti-
Federalist views on central
government and democracy
are reflected in U.S.
foundational documents.
CON-1.A.1: Madison’s arguments in Federalist No. 10 focused on the
superiority of a large republic in controlling the “mischiefs of faction,”
delegating authority to elected representatives and dispersing power
between the states and national government.
CON-1.A.2: Anti-Federalist writings, including Brutus No. 1, adhered
to popular democratic theory that emphasized the benefits of a small
decentralized republic while warning of the dangers to personal liberty
from a large, centralized government.
CON-1.B.1: Specific incidents and legal challenges that highlighted key
weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation are represented by the:
w Lack of centralized military power to address Shays’ Rebellion
w Lack of tax-law enforcement power
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
17
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
CON-1: The Constitution
emerged from the debate
about the weaknesses in the
Articles of Confederation
as a blueprint for limited
government.
BIG IDEA:
Constitutionalism
(continued)
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
CON-1.C: Explain the
ongoing impact of
political negotiation
and compromise at the
Constitutional Convention
on the development of the
constitutional system.
CON-1.C.1: Compromises deemed necessary for adoption and ratification
of the Constitution are represented by the:
w Great (Connecticut) Compromise
w Electoral College
w Three-Fifths Compromise
w Compromise on the importation of slaves
CON-1.C.2: Debates about self-government during the drafting of the
Constitution necessitated the drafting of an amendment process in
Article V that entailed either a two-thirds vote in both houses or a
proposal from two-thirds of the state legislatures, with final ratification
determined by three-fourths of the states.
CON-1.C.3: The compromises necessary to secure ratification of the
Constitution left some matters unresolved that continue to generate
discussion and debate today.
CON-1.C.4: The debate over the role of the central government, the
powers of state governments, and the rights of individuals remains at
the heart of present-day constitutional issues about democracy and
governmental power, as represented by:
w Debates about government surveillance resulting from the federal
government’s response to the 9/11 attacks
w The debate about the role of the federal government in public school
education
PMI-1: The Constitution
created a competitive
policy-making process to
ensure the people’s will
is represented and that
freedom is preserved.
BIG IDEA: Competing
Policy-Making Interests
PMI-1.A: Explain the
constitutional principles of
separation of powers and
checks and balances.
PMI-1.A.1: The powers allocated to Congress, the president, and the
courts demonstrate the separation of powers and checks and balances
features of the U.S. Constitution.
PMI-1.A.2: Federalist No. 51 explains how constitutional provisions
of separation of powers and checks and balances control abuses by
majorities.
PMI-1.B: Explain the
implications of separation
of powers and checks
and balances for the U.S.
political system.
CON-2: Federalism reflects
the dynamic distribution of
power between national and
state governments.
BIG IDEA: Constitutionalism
CON-2.A: Explain how
societal needs affect the
constitutional allocation of
power between the national
and state governments.
PMI-1.B.1: Multiple access points for stakeholders and institutions to
influence public policy flows from the separation of powers and checks
and balances.
PMI-1.B.2: Impeachment, removal, and other legal actions taken against
public officials deemed to have abused their power reflect the purpose of
checks and balances.
CON-2.A.1: The exclusive and concurrent powers of the national and
state governments help explain the negotiations over the balance of
power between the two levels.
CON-2.A.2: The distribution of power between federal and state
governments to meet the needs of society changes, as reflected by
grants, incentives, and aid programs, including federal revenue sharing,
mandates, categorical grants, and block grants.
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
18
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
CON-2: Federalism reflects
the dynamic distribution of
power between national and
state governments.
BIG IDEA: Constitutionalism
(continued)
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
CON-2.B: Explain how
the appropriate balance of
power between national and
state governments has been
interpreted differently over
time.
CON-2.B.1: The interpretation of the Tenth and Fourteenth
Amendments, the commerce clause, the necessary and proper clause,
and other enumerated and implied powers is at the heart of the debate
over the balance of power between the national and state governments.
CON-2.B.2: The balance of power between the national and state
governments has changed over time based on U.S. Supreme Court
interpretation of such cases as:
w McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), which declared that Congress has implied
powers necessary to implement its enumerated powers and established
supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws
w United States v. Lopez (1995), which ruled that Congress may not use
the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a
federal crime, introducing a new phase of federalism that recognized the
importance of state sovereignty and local control
CON-2.C: Explain how
the distribution of powers
among three federal
branches and between
national and state
governments impacts policy
making.
CON-2.C.1: Multiple access points for stakeholders and institutions
to influence public policy flows from the allocation of powers between
national and state governments.
CON-2.C.2: National policymaking is constrained by the sharing of power
between and among the three branches and state governments.
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
19
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
UNIT 3:
Civil Liberties and
Civil Rights
Through the U.S. Constitution, but primarily through the Bill of
Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, citizens and groups
have attempted to restrict national and state governments
from unduly infringing upon individual rights essential to
ordered liberty and from denying equal protection under the
law. Likewise, it has sometimes been argued that these
legal protections have been used to block reforms and
restrict freedoms of others in the name of social order.
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
LOR-2: Provisions of the
U.S. Constitution’s Bill of
Rights are continually being
interpreted to balance the
power of government and the
civil liberties of individuals.
BIG IDEA:
Liberty and Order
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
LOR-2.A: Explain how the
U.S. Constitution protects
individual liberties and
rights.
LOR-2.A.1: The U.S. Constitution includes a Bill of Rights specifically
designed to protect individual liberties and rights.
LOR-2.A.2: Civil liberties are constitutionally established guarantees and
freedoms that protect citizens, opinions, and property against arbitrary
government interference.
LOR-2.A.3: The application of the Bill of Rights is continuously
interpreted by the courts.
LOR-2.B: Describe the rights
protected in the Bill of
Rights.
LOR-2.C: Explain the extent
to which the Supreme
Court’s interpretation
of the First and Second
Amendments reflects a
commitment to individual
liberty.
LOR-2.B.1: The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten Amendments to the
Constitution, which enumerate the liberties and rights of individuals.
LOR-2.C.1: The interpretation and application of the First Amendment’s
establishment and free exercise clauses reflect an ongoing debate over
balancing majoritarian religions practice and free exercise, as represented
by such cases as:
w Engel v. Vitale (1962), which declared school sponsorship of religious
activities violates the establishment clause
w Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), which held that compelling Amish students to
attend school past the eighth grade violates the free exercise clause
LOR-2.C.2: The Supreme Court has held that symbolic speech is protected
by the First Amendment, demonstrated by Tinker v. Des Moines
Independent Community School District (1969), in which the court
ruled that public school students could wear black armbands in school to
protest the Vietnam War.
LOR-2.C.3: Efforts to balance social order and individual freedom are
reflected in interpretations of the First Amendment that limit speech,
including:
w Time, place, and manner regulations
w Defamatory, offensive, and obscene statements and gestures
w That which creates a “clear and present danger” based on the ruling in
Schenck v. United States (1919)
LOR-2.C.4: In New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), the Supreme
Court bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a “heavy
presumption against prior restraint” even in cases involving national
security.
LOR-2.C.5: The Supreme Court’s decisions on the Second Amendment
rest upon its constitutional interpretation of individual liberty.
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
26
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
LOR-2: Provisions of the
U.S. Constitution’s Bill of
Rights are continually being
interpreted to balance the
power of government and the
civil liberties of individuals.
BIG IDEA:
Liberty and Order
(continued)
LOR-3: Protections of the
Bill of Rights have been
selectively incorporated
by way of the Fourteenth
Amendment’s due process
clause to prevent state
infringement of basic
liberties.
BIG IDEA:
Liberty and Order
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
LOR-2.D: Explain how
the Supreme Court has
attempted to balance claims
of individual freedom with
laws and enforcement
procedures that promote
public order and safety.
LOR-2.D.1: Court decisions defining cruel and unusual punishment
involve interpretation of the Eighth Amendment and its application to
state death penalty statutes over time.
LOR-2.D.2: The debate about the Second and Fourth Amendments
involves concerns about public safety and whether or not the government
regulation of firearms or collection of digital metadata promotes or
interferes with public safety and individual rights.
LOR-3.A: Explain the
implications of the doctrine
of selective incorporation.
LOR-3.A.1: The doctrine of selective incorporation has imposed on state
regulation of civil rights and liberties as represented by:
w McDonald v. Chicago (2010), which ruled the Second Amendment’s right
to keep and bear arms for self-defense in one’s home is applicable to the
states through the Fourteenth Amendment
LOR-3.B: Explain the
extent to which states are
limited by the due process
clause from infringing upon
individual rights.
LOR-3.B.1: The Supreme Court has on occasion ruled in favor of states’
power to restrict individual liberty; for example, when speech can be
shown to increase the danger to public safety.
LOR-3.B.2: The Miranda rule involves the interpretation and application of
accused persons’ due process rights as protected by the Fifth and Sixth
Amendments, yet the Supreme Court has sanctioned a public safety
exception that allows unwarned interrogation to stand as direct evidence
in court.
LOR-3.B.3: Pretrial rights of the accused and the prohibition of unreasonable
searches and seizures are intended to ensure that citizen liberties are not
eclipsed by the need for social order and security, including:
w The right to legal counsel, a speedy and public trial, and an impartial jury
w Protection against warrantless searches of cell phone data under the Fourth
Amendment
w Limitations placed on bulk collection of telecommunication metadata
(Patriot and USA Freedom Acts)
LOR-3.B.4: The due process clause has been applied to guarantee the
right to an attorney and protection from unreasonable searches and
seizures, as represented by:
w Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), which guaranteed the right to an attorney for
the poor or indigent in a state felony case
w The exclusionary rule, which stipulates that evidence illegally seized by law
enforcement officers in violation of the suspect’s Fourth Amendment right
to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against
that suspect in criminal prosecution
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
27
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
LOR-3: Protections of the
Bill of Rights have been
selectively incorporated
by way of the Fourteenth
Amendment’s due process
clause to prevent state
infringement of basic
liberties.
BIG IDEA:
Liberty and Order
(continued)
PRD-1: The Fourteenth
Amendment’s equal
protection clause as well
as other constitutional
provisions have often
been used to support the
advancement of equality.
BIG IDEA:
Civic Participation in a
Representative Democracy
PMI-3: Public policy
promoting civil rights is
influenced by citizen–state
interactions and constitutional
interpretation over time.
BIG IDEA:
Competing Policy-Making
Interests
CON-6: The Supreme
Court’s interpretation
of the U.S. Constitution
is influenced by the
composition of the
Court and citizen–state
interactions. At times, it has
restricted minority rights
and, at others, protected
them.
BIG IDEA:
Constitutionalism
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
LOR-3.B: Explain the
extent to which states are
limited by the due process
clause from infringing upon
individual rights.
(continued)
LOR-3.B.5: While a right to privacy is not explicitly named in the Constitution,
the Supreme Court has interpreted the due process clause to protect the right
of privacy from state infringement. This interpretation of the due process
clause has been the subject of controversy, such as has resulted from:
w Roe v. Wade (1973), which extended the right of privacy to a woman’s
decision to have an abortion while recognizing compelling state interests in
potential life and maternal health
PRD-1.A: Explain how
constitutional provisions
have supported and
motivated social movements.
PRD-1.A.1: Civil rights protect individuals from discrimination based
on characteristics such as race, national origin, religion, and sex; these
rights are guaranteed to all citizens under the due process and equal
protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution, as well as acts of Congress.
PRD-1.A.2: The leadership and events associated with civil, women’s,
and LGBTQ rights are evidence of how the equal protection clause can
support and motivate social movements, as represented by:
w Dr. Martin Luther King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” and the civil
rights movement of the 1960s
w The National Organization for Women and the women’s rights movement
w The pro-life (anti-abortion) movement
PMI-3.A: Explain how the
government has responded
to social movements.
PMI-3.A.1: The government can respond to social movements through
court rulings and/or policies, as in:
w Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared that race-based school
segregation violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause
w The Civil Rights Act of 1964
w Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972
w The Voting Rights Act of 1965
CON-6.A: Explain how the
Supreme Court has at times
allowed the restriction of
the civil rights of minority
groups and at other times
has protected those rights.
CON-6.A.1: Decisions demonstrating that minority rights have been
restricted at times and protected at other times include:
w State laws and Supreme Court holdings restricting African American
access to the same restaurants, hotels, schools, etc., as the majority white
population based on the “separate but equal” doctrine
w Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared that race-based school
segregation violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause
w The Supreme Court upholding the rights of the majority in cases that limit
and prohibit majority-minority districting
CON-6.A.2: The debate on affirmative action includes justices who insist
that the Constitution is colorblind and those who maintain that it forbids
only racial classifications designed to harm minorities, not help them.
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
28
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
UNIT 4:
American Political
Ideologies and Beliefs
American political beliefs are shaped by founding ideals,
core values, linkage institutions (e.g., elections, political
parties, interest groups, and the media in all its forms),
and the changing demographics of citizens. These beliefs
about government, politics, and the individual’s role in the
political system influence the creation of public policies.
Content Outline
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
MPA-1: Citizen beliefs
about government are
shaped by the intersection
of demographics, political
culture, and dynamic social
change.
BIG IDEA:
Methods of Political
Analysis
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
MPA-1.A: Explain the
relationship between core
beliefs of U.S. citizens and
attitudes about the role of
government.
MPA-1.B: Explain how
cultural factors influence
political attitudes and
socialization.
MPA-1.A.1: Different interpretations of core values, including
individualism, equality of opportunity, free enterprise, rule of law, and
limited government, affect the relationship between citizens and the
federal government and the relationships citizens have with one another.
MPA-1.B.1: Family, schools, peers, media, and social environments
(including civic and religious organizations) contribute to the
development of an individual’s political attitudes and values through the
process of political socialization.
MPA-1.B.2: As a result of globalization, U.S. political culture has both
influenced and been influenced by the values of other countries.
MPA-1.B.3: Generational and lifecycle effects also contribute to the
political socialization that influences an individual’s political attitudes.
MPA-1.B.4: The relative importance of major political events to the
development of individual political attitudes is an example of political
socialization.
MPA-2: Public opinion is
measured through scientific
polling, and the results
of public opinion polls
influence public policies and
institutions.
BIG IDEA:
Methods of Political
Analysis
MPA-2.A: Describe the
elements of a scientific poll.
MPA-2.A.1: Public opinion data that can impact elections and policy
debates is affected by such scientific polling types and methods as:
w Type of poll (opinion polls, benchmark or tracking polls, entrance and exit
polls)
w Sampling techniques, identification of respondents, mass survey or focus
group, sampling error
w Type and format of questions
MPA-2.B: Explain the quality
and credibility of claims
based on public opinion
data.
PMI-4: Widely held political
ideologies shape policy
debates and choices in
American policies.
BIG IDEA:
Competing Policy-Making
Interests
PMI-4.A: Explain how
the ideologies of the two
major parties shape policy
debates.
PMI-4.B: Explain how U.S.
political culture (e.g., values
attitudes, and beliefs)
influences the formation,
goals, and implementation
of public policy over time.
PMI-4.C: Describe different
political ideologies
regarding the role of
government in regulating
the marketplace.
MPA-2.B.1: The relationship between scientific polling and elections and
policy debates is affected by the:
w Importance of public opinion as a source of political influence in a given
election or policy debate
w Reliability and veracity of public opinion data
PMI-4.A.1: The Democratic Party (D or DEM) platforms generally align
more closely to liberal ideological positions, and the Republican Party
(R or GOP) platforms generally align more closely to conservative
ideological positions.
PMI-4.B.1: Because the U.S. is a democracy with a diverse society, public
, policies generated at any given time reflect the attitudes and beliefs of
citizens who choose to participate in politics at that time.
PMI-4.B.2: The balancing dynamic of individual liberty and government
efforts to promote stability and order has been reflected in policy debates
and their outcomes over time.
PMI-4.C.1: Liberal ideologies favor more governmental regulation of
the marketplace, conservative ideologies favor fewer regulations, and
libertarian ideologies favor little or no regulation of the marketplace
beyond the protection of property rights and voluntary trade.
AP U.S. Government and Politics Course Framework
Return to Table of Contents
© 2018 The College Board
30
Enduring Understanding
Students will understand
that …
ideologies shape policy
debates and choices in
American policies.
BIG IDEA:
Competing Policy-Making
Interests
(continued)
Learning Objective
Essential Knowledge
Students will be able to … Students will know that …
PMI-4: Widely held political PMI-4.D: Explain how
political ideologies vary on
the government’s role in
regulating the marketplace.
PMI-4.E: Explain how
political ideologies vary on
the role of the government
in addressing social issues.
PMI-4.D.1: Ideological differences on marketplace regulation are based
on different theoretical support, including Keynesian and supply-side
positions on monetary and fiscal policies promoted by the president,
Congress, and the Federal Reserve.
PMI-4.E.1: Liberal ideologies tend to think that personal privacy—areas
of behavior where government should not intrude—extends further than
conservative ideologies do (except in arenas involving religious and
educational freedom); conservative ideologies favor less government
involvement to ensure social and economic equality; and libertarian
ideologies disfavor any governmental intervention beyond the protection
of private property and individual liberty.
PMI-4.F: Explain how
different ideologies impact
policy on social issues.
PMI-4.F.1: Policy trends concerning the level of government involvement
in social issues reflect the success of conservative or liberal perspectives
in political parties.