Neuromuscular Adaptation to Resistance Training
Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training
Acute vs. Chronic Resistance Training
- Acute Resistance Training (Weeks):
- Strength adaptations primarily due to neural changes.
- No significant changes in muscle size observed.
- Chronic Resistance Training (Years):
- Further adaptations in the nervous system.
- Significant muscle hypertrophy (increase in muscle cross-sectional area).
- Increased force generating capacity is due to both neural adaptations and muscle hypertrophy.
Limitations in Research
- Most training studies are approximately twelve weeks in duration due to logistical and financial reasons.
- Neural adaptations likely dominate during the early training phase.
- Long-term adaptations are more related to muscle hypertrophy.
Ongoing Neural Adaptations
- Strength increases rapidly, then plateaus after years of training.
- Varying training stimulus is needed to bring about smaller but continued improvements in strength.
- Muscle hypertrophy contributes significantly after the initial weeks of training.
- Neural adaptations occur rapidly initially, then were thought to plateau.
- Varying the training stimulus may evoke ongoing positive neural adaptations.
Complexity of Movement Pattern
- The more complex the movement, the longer the time required to stimulate muscle hypertrophy due to a longer neural adaptation time.
- The more complex the motor pattern, the greater the long-term potential for hypertrophy.
Examples:
- Arm Curl:
- Increase in strength observed at both mid-training (ten weeks) and post-training (twenty weeks).
- Lean arm muscle mass significantly improved at the mid-training point.
- Bench Press & Leg Press:
- Increases in one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength at both mid and post-training points.
- Lean muscle mass improvements primarily observed at the post-training point due to the longer neural adaptation time required for complex exercises.
Neural Adaptations Schematic (Sale, 2003)
- Strength training leads to:
- Increased agonist muscle activation.
- Appropriate muscle synergist activation.
- Potential decrease in antagonist activation.
- These adaptations result in:
- Increasing force.
- Increased rate of force development.
- Overall improved strength performance.
Endurance Training Effects
- Endurance training can stimulate the opposite effects of resistance training.
- Resistance training can assist endurance/aerobic performance.
- Endurance training can be detrimental to elite strength and power performance.
Neural Effects of Training
- Panel A: Higher threshold motor units can be activated after strength training.
- Panel B: Increase in motor unit firing rate occurs, allowing the muscle fiber to operate further up on its force-frequency relationship.
- Panel C: Increased motor unit firing rate increases the speed at which force is generated.
Effects of Explosive and Heavy Resistance Training on EMG Activity and Force Output
Explosive Type Resistance Training
- Small increases in peak force (especially in untrained individuals).
- Large increases in rate of force development (e.g., 24%).
- Increase in EMG activity during peak force development (e.g., 8%).
- Increase in EMG activity during the early phase of contraction (rate of force development) (e.g., 38%).
Heavy Load Resistance Training
- Large increases in peak force (e.g., 27%).
- No significant improvements in rate of force development.
- No increase in EMG activity during the early phase of training.
Differences Between Trained and Untrained Individuals
- Untrained Subjects: May exhibit a phase of inhibition of EMG activity during the high stretch-load component of a task (e.g., drop jump).
- Trained Subjects: May have a period of facilitation of EMG activity during the eccentric phase of high stretch-load, enabling better performance.
Rate of Force Development (RFD)
- RFD might increase by as much as 80% with ballistic/explosive type training.
- The rate of motor unit firing also increased from somewhere between 58 to 98 hertz before training to as high as 182 hertz after training.
- Increased firing rates contribute to increased rate of force development.
Corticospinal Motor Neuron Responses to Strength Training (Mason et al., 2019)
- Meta-analysis found:
- Increase in corticospinal excitability.
- Intracortical facilitation.
- Reduction in the corticospinal silent period (decreased inhibition).
- No effect on short interval and long interval intracortical inhibition.
- Strength training increased the excitability of corticospinal axons.
Study by James Nunno et al.
- 12 sessions of high force isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.
- Strength training group (7 females, 3 males).
- Control group (2 females, 9 males).
Results:
- Peak torque increased by approximately 13% after 4 weeks in the strength training group (no change in control).
- Biceps EMG increased by approximately 28% after the training period (no change in control).
- No change in triceps EMG (antagonist muscle).
- Improvement in voluntary activation from 88% to approximately 93% after training (no change in control).
- No change in cervical medullary evoked potential (indicating no adaptations at the spinal level).
- Concluded that improvements were due to better voluntary output from the motor cortex.
Motor Unit Adaptations (Sale, 2002/2003)
- Demonstrated a shift in the time to peak activation after training (shorter time).
- Shift upwards in the relationship between force and recruitment threshold.
Motor Unit Characteristics with Strength Training (Del Vecchio et al.)
- Four weeks of strength training in ankle dorsiflexor muscles with isometric contractions.
Results:
- Greater motor unit firing rates during steady contraction periods after training.
- No change in discharge rate during recruitment or de-recruitment phases.
- Lower recruitment threshold after the training period.
- For example, at 35% contraction strength, recruitment threshold went from 311 to 271. (Intervention group).
- No change in force per motor unit firing after training.
- Suggests that adaptive changes are due to neural mechanisms, not muscular mechanisms.
Persistent Inward Currents
- Persistent inward currents are strongly upregulated by serotonin and noradrenaline and help motor neurons fire more easily.
- Study by Esato et al. showed increased persistent in recurrent activity after 6 weeks of power-oriented resistance training.
- Demonstrated in older adults where persistent inward current activity is initially reduced.
Neuromuscular Junction Adaptations (Deschenes et al.)
- String training produces significant alterations in the neuromuscular junction, increased total area dispersion, stain perimeter and total perimeter of the neuromuscular junction.
- Conducted on rats
Effects of Trendel Running (2006):
- Increase in the length of neuromuscular junction branching.
- Increased complexity of neuromuscular junction branching.
- At the postsynaptic level:
- Decrease in length of neuromuscular junction branching.
- Decreased complexity of neuromuscular junction branching.
Detraining Effects:
- Presynaptically: no effect on presynaptic parameters measured.
- Postsynaptically:
- Decrease in length of neuromuscular junction branching.
- Decrease in complexity.
Effects of Exercise on Muscle Fiber Characteristics:
- Lower cross-sectional area after low-intensity training.
- Significant increase in citrate synthase activity for both high and low intensity training groups.
- Exercise interventions for high-intensity training: 5 days per week for 12 weeks (treadmill running at 24 meters per minute).
- Low-intensity group training: 5 days per week for 12 weeks (treadmill running at 24 meters per minute).