Neuromuscular Adaptation to Resistance Training

Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training

Acute vs. Chronic Resistance Training

  • Acute Resistance Training (Weeks):
    • Strength adaptations primarily due to neural changes.
    • No significant changes in muscle size observed.
  • Chronic Resistance Training (Years):
    • Further adaptations in the nervous system.
    • Significant muscle hypertrophy (increase in muscle cross-sectional area).
    • Increased force generating capacity is due to both neural adaptations and muscle hypertrophy.

Limitations in Research

  • Most training studies are approximately twelve weeks in duration due to logistical and financial reasons.
  • Neural adaptations likely dominate during the early training phase.
  • Long-term adaptations are more related to muscle hypertrophy.

Ongoing Neural Adaptations

  • Strength increases rapidly, then plateaus after years of training.
  • Varying training stimulus is needed to bring about smaller but continued improvements in strength.
  • Muscle hypertrophy contributes significantly after the initial weeks of training.
  • Neural adaptations occur rapidly initially, then were thought to plateau.
  • Varying the training stimulus may evoke ongoing positive neural adaptations.

Complexity of Movement Pattern

  • The more complex the movement, the longer the time required to stimulate muscle hypertrophy due to a longer neural adaptation time.
  • The more complex the motor pattern, the greater the long-term potential for hypertrophy.
Examples:
  • Arm Curl:
    • Increase in strength observed at both mid-training (ten weeks) and post-training (twenty weeks).
    • Lean arm muscle mass significantly improved at the mid-training point.
  • Bench Press & Leg Press:
    • Increases in one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength at both mid and post-training points.
    • Lean muscle mass improvements primarily observed at the post-training point due to the longer neural adaptation time required for complex exercises.

Neural Adaptations Schematic (Sale, 2003)

  • Strength training leads to:
    • Increased agonist muscle activation.
    • Appropriate muscle synergist activation.
    • Potential decrease in antagonist activation.
  • These adaptations result in:
    • Increasing force.
    • Increased rate of force development.
    • Overall improved strength performance.

Endurance Training Effects

  • Endurance training can stimulate the opposite effects of resistance training.
  • Resistance training can assist endurance/aerobic performance.
  • Endurance training can be detrimental to elite strength and power performance.

Neural Effects of Training

  • Panel A: Higher threshold motor units can be activated after strength training.
  • Panel B: Increase in motor unit firing rate occurs, allowing the muscle fiber to operate further up on its force-frequency relationship.
  • Panel C: Increased motor unit firing rate increases the speed at which force is generated.

Effects of Explosive and Heavy Resistance Training on EMG Activity and Force Output

Explosive Type Resistance Training
  • Small increases in peak force (especially in untrained individuals).
  • Large increases in rate of force development (e.g., 24%).
  • Increase in EMG activity during peak force development (e.g., 8%).
  • Increase in EMG activity during the early phase of contraction (rate of force development) (e.g., 38%).
Heavy Load Resistance Training
  • Large increases in peak force (e.g., 27%).
  • No significant improvements in rate of force development.
  • No increase in EMG activity during the early phase of training.

Differences Between Trained and Untrained Individuals

  • Untrained Subjects: May exhibit a phase of inhibition of EMG activity during the high stretch-load component of a task (e.g., drop jump).
  • Trained Subjects: May have a period of facilitation of EMG activity during the eccentric phase of high stretch-load, enabling better performance.

Rate of Force Development (RFD)

  • RFD might increase by as much as 80% with ballistic/explosive type training.
  • The rate of motor unit firing also increased from somewhere between 5858 to 9898 hertz before training to as high as 182182 hertz after training.
  • Increased firing rates contribute to increased rate of force development.

Corticospinal Motor Neuron Responses to Strength Training (Mason et al., 2019)

  • Meta-analysis found:
    • Increase in corticospinal excitability.
    • Intracortical facilitation.
    • Reduction in the corticospinal silent period (decreased inhibition).
  • No effect on short interval and long interval intracortical inhibition.
  • Strength training increased the excitability of corticospinal axons.

Study by James Nunno et al.

  • 12 sessions of high force isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.
    • Strength training group (7 females, 3 males).
    • Control group (2 females, 9 males).
Results:
  • Peak torque increased by approximately 13% after 4 weeks in the strength training group (no change in control).
  • Biceps EMG increased by approximately 28% after the training period (no change in control).
  • No change in triceps EMG (antagonist muscle).
  • Improvement in voluntary activation from 88% to approximately 93% after training (no change in control).
  • No change in cervical medullary evoked potential (indicating no adaptations at the spinal level).
    • Concluded that improvements were due to better voluntary output from the motor cortex.

Motor Unit Adaptations (Sale, 2002/2003)

  • Demonstrated a shift in the time to peak activation after training (shorter time).
  • Shift upwards in the relationship between force and recruitment threshold.

Motor Unit Characteristics with Strength Training (Del Vecchio et al.)

  • Four weeks of strength training in ankle dorsiflexor muscles with isometric contractions.
Results:
  • Greater motor unit firing rates during steady contraction periods after training.
  • No change in discharge rate during recruitment or de-recruitment phases.
  • Lower recruitment threshold after the training period.
    • For example, at 35% contraction strength, recruitment threshold went from 311311 to 271271. (Intervention group).
  • No change in force per motor unit firing after training.
    • Suggests that adaptive changes are due to neural mechanisms, not muscular mechanisms.

Persistent Inward Currents

  • Persistent inward currents are strongly upregulated by serotonin and noradrenaline and help motor neurons fire more easily.
  • Study by Esato et al. showed increased persistent in recurrent activity after 6 weeks of power-oriented resistance training.
  • Demonstrated in older adults where persistent inward current activity is initially reduced.

Neuromuscular Junction Adaptations (Deschenes et al.)

  • String training produces significant alterations in the neuromuscular junction, increased total area dispersion, stain perimeter and total perimeter of the neuromuscular junction.
  • Conducted on rats
Effects of Trendel Running (2006):
  • Increase in the length of neuromuscular junction branching.
  • Increased complexity of neuromuscular junction branching.
  • At the postsynaptic level:
    • Decrease in length of neuromuscular junction branching.
    • Decreased complexity of neuromuscular junction branching.
Detraining Effects:
  • Presynaptically: no effect on presynaptic parameters measured.
  • Postsynaptically:
    • Decrease in length of neuromuscular junction branching.
    • Decrease in complexity.
Effects of Exercise on Muscle Fiber Characteristics:
  • Lower cross-sectional area after low-intensity training.
  • Significant increase in citrate synthase activity for both high and low intensity training groups.
  • Exercise interventions for high-intensity training: 5 days per week for 12 weeks (treadmill running at 24 meters per minute).
  • Low-intensity group training: 5 days per week for 12 weeks (treadmill running at 24 meters per minute).