prompt 6

Some people think that it is country should develop their own films and

TV programs instead. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

view 1

view 2

opinion 

  • Preserve national culture and identity

  • Reflect local values, traditions, and social issues

  • Create jobs and support the local creative industry

  • Example: successful national film industries (e.g. cultural export)

  • Higher quality due to bigger budgets and expertise

  • Greater variety and global perspectives

  • Promote cross-cultural understanding

  • making local films should be a priority, while can still allowing selected international programmes

Some people argue that countries should focus on developing their own films and television programmes rather than relying on foreign content. Others believe that importing international media brings more benefits. This essay will discuss both views before explaining why I believe a combination of both approaches is the most reasonable.

On the one hand, producing domestic films and TV shows plays a crucial role in preserving national culture and identity. Locally made programmes reflect a country’s traditions, values, and social issues, which helps citizens, especially young people, develop a stronger sense of belonging. In addition, investing in the local entertainment industry creates employment opportunities for actors, directors, and technical staff, thereby contributing to economic growth. Countries such as South Korea have demonstrated that strong government support for domestic media can result in both cultural influence and international success.

On the other hand, supporters of importing foreign films and television programmes argue that this allows audiences to access higher-quality content and diverse perspectives. Many international productions benefit from larger budgets, advanced technology, and experienced professionals, resulting in superior visual effects and storytelling. In addition, many countries lack the financial resources or advanced technology required to produce world-class media, making international programmes a cost-effective alternative. Furthermore, exposure to foreign cultures through films and TV shows can broaden viewers’ perspectives and promote cross-cultural understanding in an increasingly globalised world.

In my opinion, while developing domestic media should be a priority, completely rejecting foreign content is neither realistic nor beneficial. Governments should invest in local film and television industries to protect cultural identity, while still allowing selected international programmes to enrich the entertainment landscape. This balanced approach enables countries to strengthen their cultural presence without isolating themselves from global influences.

In conclusion, although foreign media offers variety and quality, supporting local film and television production is essential. A combination of domestic development and selective international imports is the most effective strategy.