6. 12 Government and Economic Policy in the Gilded Age

The Historical Context of Government Intervention in the US Economy

  • The debate regarding the federal government's role in the economy predates the Gilded Age, rooted in the founding of the United States.
  • A primary historical example includes the conflict between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson regarding the creation of a national bank.
  • Another significant historical debate involved Henry Clay's American System, where Congress argued over whether the government should sponsor infrastructure improvements such as roads and canals.
  • During previous eras, such as those involving the National Bank or the American System, the government took a "hands-on" approach. However, the Gilded Age was defined by a transition to a Laissez-Faire approach.

The Principles and Foundations of Laissez-Faire Economics

  • "Laissez-Faire" is a French phrase translating to "leave alone" or "let alone."
  • During the Gilded Age (1870s1870\text{s} to 19001900), the federal government maintained a hands-off posture toward the national economy.
  • Three primary ideological reasons contributed to this Laissez-Faire stance:
  1. The Belief in Hard Work as the Source of Prosperity

    • There was a growing acceptance that economic success was the direct result of individual talent and effort.
    • Popular culture reinforced this; for instance, the novels of Horatio Alger depicted characters rising from "rags to riches" through hard work.
    • Religious leaders, such as Baptist pastor Russell Conwell, equated the honest pursuit of wealth with Christian duty. Conwell suggested that poverty was a sign of vice or God withholding wealth due to sin.
    • This stood in direct opposition to the Social Gospel movement, which argued that poverty resulted from systemic inequalities rather than personal failing.
    • The elite perceived the economy as a meritocracy, where the most resourceful rose to the top, leading wealthy industrialists to oppose government intervention as an obstacle to merit-based success.
  2. Free Market Principles (Adam Smith)

    • Policymakers adhered to principles articulated by Adam Smith in his 17761776 book, "The Wealth of Nations."
    • Smith argued that an "invisible hand," guided by the laws of supply and demand, should organize economic relationships.
    • Smith’s formula for flourishing required the restraint of artificial influences, specifically the government.
    • The Disconnect in Application: While tycoons cited Smith, the Gilded Age economy lacked the "competition" Smith deemed vital. Business leaders consolidated power into monopolies and trusts, eliminating the competitive environment.
    • President Grover Cleveland exemplified this ideology when he vetoed the Texas Seed Bill in 18871887. Despite Texan farmers losing 85%85\% of their cattle to drought and eating their seed corn to survive, Cleveland argued: "Though the people support the government, the government should not support the people."
  3. Social Darwinism

    • This ideology applied "survival of the fittest" to sociology and economics.
    • Proponents argued that government assistance to "weaker" individuals or businesses would ultimately harm the long-term prosperity and evolution of the American economic system.

Contradictions in Laissez-Faire Policy: Selective Intervention

  • While industrial leaders opposed government intervention that hindered their business (like regulations or social relief), they actively sought government help when it benefited them.
  • Protective Tariffs: Businesses pressured Congress for high tariffs to protect domestic products from foreign competition.
  • Land Grants: The federal government granted massive tracts of land to railroad companies to facilitate the construction of transcontinental railroads.
  • Labor Suppression: Business leaders requested, and received, federal military intervention to break strikes, such as the Pullman Strike in 18941894, where President Cleveland deployed troops to end the labor action.

Expansion into Foreign Markets and Natural Resources

  • Rapid industrialization led to a fear that domestic, European, and Canadian markets could not consume the surplus of manufactured goods produced by the American sector.
  • This drove a desire to control foreign markets and natural resources in three key areas:
  1. The Pacific Rim (Hawaii)

    • American sugar companies, such as Castle and Cook, gained control over Hawaii, a process initiated by American missionaries.
    • Once the Hawaiian economy was integrated into the US economy, white Americans led a coup to topple the indigenous government.
    • Congress officially approved the annexation of Hawaii in 18981898.
  2. Asia (China)

    • In 18681868, the US signed the Burlingame Treaty with China.
    • The treaty allowed American missionaries access to China and established a profitable trade relationship by granting the United States "most favored nation" status.
    • The treaty also encouraged Chinese immigration to provide a source of cheap labor (occurring roughly 1515 years before the Chinese Exclusion Act).
  3. Alaska

    • In 18671867, Secretary of State William Seward purchased the Alaskan territory from Russia for $7.2million\$7.2\,million.
    • Initially mocked as "Seward's Folly" or a frozen wasteland, Seward viewed it as a strategic gateway to Asian markets.
    • The discovery of gold in 18961896 triggered the Klondike Gold Rush, and later, the territory provided access to significant oil reserves and natural resources.