TCMTrumpSpring2018-FINAL
Transatlantic Council on Migration: U.S. Immigration Policy under Trump
Authors
Sarah Pierce
Jessica Bolter
Andrew Selee
Published: July 2018
Overview
The report outlines the deep changes and lasting impacts of U.S. immigration policy under President Donald Trump.
Acknowledgments
Authors express gratitude to colleagues at Migration Policy Institute (MPI) for their advice and edits, and acknowledge guidance from Doris Meissner and Michelle Mittelstadt.
Research commissioned for the Transatlantic Council on Migration's plenary meeting in Stockholm, November 2017.
Supported by foundations and governments, including the Open Society Foundations and several European nations.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
What Has Changed
Enhancing Immigration Enforcement
Cutting Back on Humanitarian Programs
Increasing Vetting and Obstacles for Legal Immigration
Ending DACA
The Impact of Expectations and Anxiety
Congressional Inaction and Resistance
Pushback from Local and State Governments
The Role of the Courts
Conclusion
Works Cited
About the Authors
Executive Summary
Trump’s administration focused heavily on tough immigration policies from day one, implementing executive orders for significant changes, including:
Cuts to legal immigration
Construction of a border wall
Extreme vetting of immigrants
Increased enforcement inside the U.S.
Legal challenges have hindered the administration's efforts, with many states resisting cooperation with federal authorities.
The shift in policy framed immigrants as a security threat, contrary to past bipartisan views.
I. Introduction
Immigration policy has seen a shift since Trump’s inauguration, emphasizing security concerns.
Divergent views on immigration compared to past agreements among political leaders.
Broad discretion of presidency allows significant changes even without legislation.
II. What Has Changed
A. Enhancing Immigration Enforcement
Under Trump, ICE enforcement increased significantly:
37% rise in removals from the interior in 2017.
Arrests of noncriminals have risen, which contrasts previous strategies focusing on serious criminals.
New policies resulted in broader categories of noncitizens being targeted for removal.
B. Cutting Back on Humanitarian Programs
The administration reduced refugee admissions drastically:
Ceiling dropped to 45,000 in FY 2018, the lowest since inception in 1980.
Termination of the Central American Minors program, affecting vulnerable children seeking refuge.
Temporary Protected Status (TPS) ended for numerous countries, affecting hundreds of thousands.
C. Increasing Vetting and Obstacles for Legal Immigration
Enhanced vetting procedures implemented:
Interviews required for all applicants, increasing the workload and slowing processing.
New requirements for extensive personal history and social media accounts.
D. Ending DACA
Decision to phase out DACA, affecting approximately 700,000 individuals.
Ongoing court battles related to the program create uncertainty for current and potential DACA beneficiaries.
III. The Impact of Expectations and Anxiety
Changes have led to increased fear among immigrant communities, resulting in:
Decreased crime reporting.
Lower applications for public benefits.
A rise in asylum seekers entering Canada.
IV. Congressional Inaction and Resistance
Despite Republican control, Congress has not successfully passed significant immigration legislation.
Bipartisan disagreements hinder progress on immigration reform efforts and funding.
V. Pushback from Local and State Governments
Resistance from states, with some enacting sanctuary policies limiting local cooperation with ICE.
The Trump administration has faced legal challenges from states like California for their policies.
VI. The Role of the Courts
Courts have blocked many of Trump's immigration initiatives, signaling a more judicially active response.
The Supreme Court upheld the latest travel ban but faced opposition to earlier versions.
VII. Conclusion
The Trump administration is remaking U.S. immigration policy, emphasizing restriction and enforcement.
Incremental changes are reshaping immigration flows, despite opposition from various sectors of government.