Normative Ethics Overview

Normative Ethics

  • Case: The Ford Pinto
    • Incident occurred in January 10, 1978, near Goshen, Indiana.
    • 3 teenagers died due to a punctured gas tank.

2. Ethics and Morality

  • Ethics: Systematic reflection on morality. Derived from Greek word 'Ethos' (custom, morals, conviction).
    • Latin equivalent: 'Mos' (mores).
  • Morality: Totality of opinions, decisions, and actions reflecting what is collectively believed to be good or right.
    • Descriptive Morality: Describes existing moral views, customs, and opinions on responsible behavior.
    • Prescriptive Morality: Proposes judgments and normative recommendations on how to act or live, associated with normative ethics.

Page 2

3. Judgements (Descriptive & Normative)

  • Central Questions in Normative Ethics:
    • What is the right opinion, decision, or action?
    • Normative Judgment: What is considered correct behavior?
    • Descriptive Judgment: What was, is, or will be the case (can be true or false).
    • Example: "The Challenger met all safety standards of the time."
    • Normative Judgment: Evaluates goods and bads, right or wrong (e.g., "The Challenger should never have been launched").

4. Values, Norms and Virtues

  • Values: Lasting beliefs that people strive for to lead a good life.
    • Examples: Justice, Health, Happiness, Charity, Equality, Liberty.
    • Intrinsic values: Good in themselves (e.g., money, work).
    • Instrumental Values: Help achieve intrinsic values (e.g., privacy).
  • Norms: Prescriptive rules outlining required, permitted, or forbidden actions.
    • Example: Traffic system’s safety norms.
  • Virtues: Positive human traits and qualities (e.g., Justice, Honesty, Courage).
    • Moral virtues develop good character (e.g., Integrity), while intellectual virtues enhance knowledge and skills.

5. Relativism & Absolutism

  • Normative Relativism: Ethical theory claiming all moral viewpoints are equally valid.
    • Problems: Leads to contradictions and unworkable moral frameworks.
  • Absolutism: Rigid universalism with no exceptions to rules; applies universally regardless of context.
    • Conflicts and dilemmas arise, such as those involving whistleblowers.

Page 3

7.1 Theory of Ethics: Utilitarianism (Jeremy Bentham)

  • Utilitarianism: Form of consequentialism based on the utility principle; evaluates actions by their outcomes (pleasure vs pain).
    • Greatest happiness for the greatest number (Utility Principle).
    • Hedonism: Pleasure is intrinsically good; all other values are instrumental.
    • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Evaluates actions by listing pleasures and pains (conceptual moral balance sheet).
    • Issues: Difficulties arise in quantifying pleasure; potential for exploitation; forecasting outcomes can be challenging.

7.2 John Stuart Mill and Freedom Principle

  • Freedom Principle: Individuals are free to pursue their own happiness unless it hinders others.
    • Different from Bentham's approach by considering quality of pleasures as well
    • Emphasizes individual rights and no harm.
    • Issues: Difficulty in balancing interests of many vs few; higher desires may conflict.

Kantian Theory (Immanuel Kant)

  • Duties Ethics: Action is morally right when it aligns with moral law, irrespective of outcomes.
    • Concepts of Hypothetical Norm (conditional) vs Categorical Imperative (universal).
    • Categorical imperative: Act only on that maxim which can be universally applied.
  • Principles:
    • First Formulation: Universalizability without contradiction.
    • Second Formulation: Treat all individuals as ends in themselves, not merely as means.
    • Issues: Rigidity of moral laws and potential contradictions in specific cases (e.g., whistleblower scenarios).

Page 4

Issues with Kantian Ethics

  • Questions exist about the uniformity and consistency of all moral laws.
  • Example: Categorical imperatives may not apply universally (e.g., saving a friend by lying).
  • Prima Facie Norms (William Ross): Norms that should be followed unless overridden by more compelling obligations.
    • Example: Promise vs helping a friend needing assistance—important to weigh the situation.

9. Virtue Ethics

  • Emphasizes character and moral responsibility for leading good lives.
  • Aristotle's View:
    • The ultimate good (Eudaimonia) is achieved through virtuous activity.
    • Moral virtue represents equilibrium, balancing extremes (e.g., courage vs recklessness).
    • Practical wisdom assists in making choices towards virtuous actions.

10. Care Ethics

  • Focuses on the importance of relationships and moral development through them.
    • Emphasizes care, compassion, and responsibility towards others.
  • In Engineering: Requires interdisciplinary skills and a focus on teamwork, diversity, and service orientation.
    • Responsibilities include ensuring safety and sustainability in practices.

Virtues for Morally Responsible Engineers

  • Standards outlined by Michael Pritchard include:
    • Expertise, clear communication, cooperation, objectivity, openness to criticism, creativity, and integrity.
    • Emphasizes reporting accurately and a shared responsibility in ethical practices.