Note
0.0
(0)
Rate it
Take a practice test
Chat with Kai
Explore Top Notes
What is public choice theory
Note
Studied by 55 people
5.0
(1)
The Asteroid Belt and Near-Earth Objects
Note
Studied by 25 people
5.0
(1)
BY 101 Ch 4 Notes
Note
Studied by 11 people
5.0
(1)
AP Human Geography - Unit 5
Note
Studied by 19 people
5.0
(1)
Chapter 22: Alkenes and Acids
Note
Studied by 9 people
5.0
(1)
Chapter 5: Fundamentals of economic analysis
Note
Studied by 55 people
5.0
(3)
Home
Chapter 19
Chapter 19
Basis of Legal Liability
Legal Wrong
: A violation of a person’s legal rights or failure to perform a duty owed.
Types of legal wrongs:
Crime
Breach of Contract
Tort
Understanding Tort
Tort
: A legal wrong for which monetary damages are allowed as a remedy.
Plaintiff
: The injured party.
Tortfeasor
: The alleged wrongdoer.
Three Categories
:
Intentional
Strict liability
Negligence
Intentional Tort
Definition
: An intentional act or omission resulting in harm or injury.
Examples
:
Libel
Slander
Invasion of privacy
Assault
Battery
Strict Liability
Definition
: Liability imposed regardless of negligence or fault.
Examples
:
Defective products
Damages caused by animals
Hazardous activities
Workers' compensation
Negligence
Definition
: Failure to exercise the standard of care required by law to protect others from an unreasonable risk of harm.
Standard of Care
: Based on what a reasonably prudent person would do; varies by wrongful act.
Elements of Negligence
Legal Duty Owed
Breach of Legal Duty
Damage or Injury
Proximate Cause
Types of Damages
Compensatory Damages
: Compensate for losses incurred.
Special Damages
: Measurable losses like medical expenses and lost earnings.
General Damages
: Non-measurable losses like pain and suffering.
Punitive Damages
: Intended to punish and deter wrongful acts.
Legal Defenses for Negligence
Key Factors
: The ability to collect damages is influenced by state law.
Types of Defenses
:
Contributory Negligence
: If the injured party’s own negligence contributed to the injury, they cannot collect damages.
Comparative Negligence
: Burden is shared based on fault; includes:
Pure Rule
: Can collect damages but is reduced based on fault.
50% Rule
: No recovery if 50% or more at fault.
51% Rule
: No recovery if 51% or more at fault.
Last Clear Chance Rule
: Injured party can recover damages if the defendant had a last opportunity to avoid the accident but failed to do so.
Assumption of Risk
: A person recognizing inherent dangers can't recover damages.
Imputed Negligence
Under certain conditions, one person's negligence can be attributed to another:
Vicarious liability law
Family purpose doctrine
Joint business venture
Dram shop law
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Translation
: "The thing speaks for itself."
Definition
: Injury occurrence can imply negligence if:
The event normally does not happen without negligence.
The defendant had exclusive control of the cause.
The injured party did not contribute to the accident.
Standard of Care Owed by Property Owners
Trespasser
: No obligation to protect, but cannot intentionally injure.
Licensee
: Must warn of unsafe conditions.
Invitee
: Must inspect and eliminate dangerous conditions.
Attractive Nuisance
Definition
: A condition that attracts or injures children.
Liability
: Occupants can be liable for injuries to children attracted by dangerous conditions.
Other Applications of Negligence Law
Respondeat Superior
: Employers may be liable for the negligent acts of employees acting on behalf of the employer.
Parental Liability
: Parents may be liable for a child’s actions if:
The child uses a dangerous weapon.
The child acts as an agent for the parents.
A minor operates a family vehicle.
Note
0.0
(0)
Rate it
Take a practice test
Chat with Kai
Explore Top Notes
What is public choice theory
Note
Studied by 55 people
5.0
(1)
The Asteroid Belt and Near-Earth Objects
Note
Studied by 25 people
5.0
(1)
BY 101 Ch 4 Notes
Note
Studied by 11 people
5.0
(1)
AP Human Geography - Unit 5
Note
Studied by 19 people
5.0
(1)
Chapter 22: Alkenes and Acids
Note
Studied by 9 people
5.0
(1)
Chapter 5: Fundamentals of economic analysis
Note
Studied by 55 people
5.0
(3)