1 Sociology: Theoretical Approaches and Research — Quick Reference
Symbolic Interaction Approach
Goal: describe society in terms of how people experience the world; society = product of individuals interacting.
For social problems: two core questions
How do people become involved in problematic behavior?
How do people define issues as social problems?
Micro-level view; highlights perception differences among individuals; can underemphasize social structure (class, race).
Learning Theory
People learn troublesome attitudes/behaviors from others in the social environment; not a deliberate choice to break rules.
Differences between neighborhoods explained by learned norms and attitudes through social interaction.
Nanette Davis Study (1980s)
30 women in sex work.
Prostitution emerges gradually due to loneliness or economic survival; years to learn skills, norms, and attitudes.
The role becomes livelihood and part of social identity.
Labeling Theory
Reality of a situation depends on how people define it; labeling can create or reinforce social problems.
Example: alcohol use labeled as dangerous binge drinking by officials vs normal partying by peers.
Factors in labeling: actor, observer, setting, and timing; distinctions can vary by audience.
Micro vs Macro Critique
Symbolic interaction provides a micro, real-world view of social problems.
It may overlook how social structure (class, race) shapes lives.
Prostitution example: learning + labeling matter, but broader gender dynamics (men’s domination) also matter.
Check Your Learning / Recap
How does the symbolic interaction approach view society?
How do learning theory and labeling theory help explain social problems?
Major Theoretical Approaches
Social Conflict Theory: macro-level focus on social inequality based on class.
Feminist Theory: macro-level focus on patterns of gender inequality.
Symbolic Interaction Theory: micro-level focus on how individuals actually experience social life.
Finding the Facts: Sociological Research
Sociologists use theory to analyze problems and gather facts.
Examples of researchers and findings:
Barbara Ehrenreich (2001): working poor; willingness to work is not always enough to escape poverty.
Lois Benjamin (1991): racism; interviewing 100 successful Black Americans; success does not shield from racial disadvantage.
William Julius Wilson (1996): Chicago poverty; long-term poverty tied to loss of good jobs, joblessness, unstable families, and loss of hope.