Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics Study Notes

Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics

  • Each handbook in this series provides a comprehensive overview of a significant sub-discipline in language study and research.

  • The handbooks are organized into broad thematic areas, highlighting key issues and topics.

  • The series aims to integrate the discipline of language studies into a coherent overview.

Published Titles

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology - Edited by Paul de Lacy

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-switching - Edited by Barbara E. Bullock and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language - Edited by Edith L. Bavin

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages - Edited by Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics - Edited by Rajend Mesthrie

Cambridge University Press Information

  • Location: Cambridge, England

  • Additional publishing locations: New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City.

  • First publication: 2011

  • ISBN: 978-0-521-89707-5 Hardback

  • Copyright Notice: As per statutory exceptions and collective licensing agreements, reproduction of any part requires written permission of Cambridge University Press.

Table of Contents

  • List of Figures

  • List of Tables

  • Contributors

  • Preface and Acknowledgments

  • Abbreviations

  • Introduction: The Sociolinguistic Enterprise by Rajend Mesthrie

    • Part I: Foundations of Sociolinguistics

    • Power, Social Diversity, and Language by John Baugh

    • Linguistic Anthropology: The Study of Language as a Non-neutral Medium by Alessandro Duranti

    • The Social Psychology of Language: A Short History by W. Peter Robinson and Abigail Locke

    • Orality and Literacy in Sociolinguistics by Lowry Hemphill

    • Sign Languages by Robert Bayley and Ceil Lucas

    • Part II: Interaction, Style, and Discourse

    • Conversation and Interaction by Cynthia Gordon

    • Pragmatics and Discourse by Jan Blommaert

    • The Sociolinguistics of Style by Nikolas Coupland

    • Part III: Social and Regional Dialectology

    • Language, Social Class, and Status by Gregory R. Guy

    • Language and Region by William A. Kretzschmar, Jr.

    • Language and Place by Barbara Johnstone

    • Language, Gender, and Sexuality by Natalie Schilling

    • Language and Ethnicity by Carmen Fought

Linguistic Anthropology

3.1 Introduction

  • Origin: Developed in late 19th century, linked to documenting North American Indian languages.

  • Key Figure: Franz Boas, pivotal in shaping American anthropology and advocating for language study's empirical importance.

  • Focus: Boas emphasized studying unwritten languages as vital to understanding human uniqueness.

  • Structure: Linguistic anthropology comprises one of four anthropological subfields: physical (biological) anthropology, archaeology, ethnology (sociocultural anthropology).

3.2 Ontological Commitments

  • Definition: Ontology of language refers to the foundational theory of the nature of language.

  • Commitment: Linguistic anthropologists share core beliefs that language embodies specific characteristics.

  • Characteristics of Language:

    • It is a code that represents experience.

    • It serves as a form of social organization.

    • It acts as a system of differentiation.

3.3 Commitment to Study Language as a Non-Neutral Code
  • Language is viewed as a sign system expressing meanings across forms (sounds, written, gestures).

  • Definitions of meanings vary among anthropologists (intentions vs conventions).

  • Agreement: Language influences categorization and conceptualization of the world.

Classificatory Biases
  • Language constrains interpretations; earlier statements by Herder and Humboldt recognized language's impact on worldview.

  • Boas argued languages inherently classify experiences differently; examples include English's diverse terms for water versus Native American languages' unified terminology.

Principle of Linguistic Relativity
  • Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf contributed to this by asserting language influences cognition and categorization. Whorf emphasized that linguistic structures impact perception and interpretation.

3.3.2 Habituation

  • Reflexivity: Humans can reflect on their language usage. This property allows individuals to gain new perspectives based on different linguistic environments.

  • Language as Habit: Language attendance is largely unconscious and routine.

  • Language Socialization: Continuous exposure to new communicative contexts influences one’s linguistic habits.

Overcoming Linguistic Bias
  • Reflexivity and ongoing language socialization provide means to surpass inherent biases.

3.4 Language as a Form of Social Organization

  • Discussion around language shifted towards understanding how discourse acts as a social tool.

  • Ludwig Wittgenstein and J.L. Austin: Their works emphasized action-based language use as critical in understanding social interaction.

Conversation Analysis
  • Shows how language is governed by chat-specific rules while allowing for individual flexibility.

  • Principles of interaction crucial for successful conversational exchanges were delineated.

Genres and Registers
  • Genres shape social expectations within interactions. Each genre operates with distinct social structures and communicative requirements.

  • Registers represent specific linguistic styles associated with social contexts and roles, with implications in various communication scenarios.

3.5 Language as a System of Differentiation

  • Research focuses on how language distinguishes social status and identities among speakers, utilizing language ideologies significantly since the 1980s.

Language Ideologies
  • Beliefs about language structure influence social interpretations leading to ideological stances.

3.6 Conclusions

  • Continuity and Discontinuity: Linguistic anthropology's evolving understanding illustrates the amending and enriching view on language as non-neutral, essential for societal functioning.