Scientific Literacy & Scientific Process

Units, Dimensions & Basic Math Refresher
  • Science relies on precise units; fluency in converting them is essential for reading papers, problem-sets, and lab work.
  • Common base units
    • Length: centimeter, meter, kilometer, inch, foot, mile
    • Mass: gram, kilogram, pound
    • Time: second, minute, hour
  • Linear vs. square vs. cubic units
    • Linear: simply the one-dimensional length.
    • Square: area; require multiplying the linear unit by itself.
      • Example cube illustration: 4 small cubes per side → 4×4=164 \times 4 = 16 little squares on one face (not 4).
    • Cubic: volume; multiply the linear unit three times.
      • In the cube illustration: 4×4×4=644 \times 4 \times 4 = 64 little cubes form one big cube.
  • Large–scale metric example
    • 1 km = 1 000 m.
    • Area of a square 1km×1km1\,\text{km} \times 1\,\text{km}1000m×1000m=1000000m21\,000\,\text{m} \times 1\,000\,\text{m} = 1\,000\,000\,\text{m}^2 (one million square meters).
    • Volume of a cube 1km31\,\text{km}^31000×1000×1000=1000000000m31\,000 \times 1\,000 \times 1\,000 = 1\,000\,000\,000\,\text{m}^3 (one billion cubic meters).
  • Practice problems (posed in video)
    1. How many meters in 5 km? 5×1000=5000m5 \times 1\,000 = 5\,000\,\text{m}
    2. How many m² in 5 km²? 5×(1000)2=5×1000000=5000000m25 \times (1\,000)^2 = 5\times1\,000\,000 = 5\,000\,000\,\text{m}^2
    3. How many m³ in 5 km³? 5×(1000)3=5×1000000000=5000000000m35 \times (1\,000)^3 = 5\times1\,000\,000\,000 = 5\,000\,000\,000\,\text{m}^3
Overview of the Scientific Process ("Method")
  • More flexible and cyclical than a rigid checklist.
  • Core steps
    1. Observations generate a question.
    2. Consult literature – what is already known? Have others answered similar questions?
    3. Formulate a hypothesis + make a testable prediction.
      • Hypothesis: potential answer that could be falsified with data.
    4. Design & carry out study (observational or experimental).
    5. Analyze data – does it support, contradict, or partially align with the hypothesis?
    6. Publish / communicate, refine questions, generate new hypotheses → repeat cycle.
Making Observations – Key Illustrations
  • Long-term CO₂ record (Mauna Loa "Keeling Curve")
    • Up-down seasonal wiggles: photosynthesis (summer) vs. respiration (winter) in N. Hemisphere.
    • Overall upward trend: human fossil-fuel use & deforestation.
    • Demonstrates value of decades-long funding & consistent methods.
  • Microscopy example: advanced equipment extends senses; techniques often invented just to enable observation.
  • Mars Rover: robotics allow observation on inaccessible planets.
  • Diverse research teams: investigators’ identities/backgrounds shape what questions seem important → diversity broadens science.
  • Scatter-plot (salinity vs. nitrogen) illustrates “pattern observation” rather than a lone data point; suggests freshwater delivers nitrogen, ocean dilutes it.
  • Spatial patterns & GIS mapping: powerful for pollution, species distributions; courses available in Environmental Science dept.
What Makes a Good Scientific Question?
  • Specific & concrete, lends itself to a clear yes/no or quantitative answer.
  • Typically addresses:
    • Causal relationships (Does X cause Y?)
    • Patterns (How does Y vary with X?)
    • Group differences (Is mean of group A ≠ group B?)
  • Wording often includes is / will / does. Avoid should / ought / good / bad (moral or philosophical language).
  • Must be answerable with observable/measurable data.
  • Ethics & values guide which questions matter but are not themselves answered by science.
Hypotheses
  • Prediction/statement answering the scientific question, grounded in prior knowledge, logic, or observation.
  • Always at least two plausible hypotheses; potentially infinite.
  • Must be testable (potentially falsifiable).
  • Being wrong is okay—directs learning.
  • Framing highlights what variables the scientist thinks matter (e.g., tree height vs. wood properties vs. location for lightning strikes).
Evaluating Evidence
  • Possible outcomes:
    Supports hypothesis – makes it more plausible.
    Refutes hypothesis – renders it unlikely.
    Mixed/ambivalent – partial support; may require more nuanced study.
    Reveals study design issues – data suggest problem with method rather than hypothesis.
  • Strength continuum
    • No evidence → weak → stronger → strongly supported → Theory (e.g., evolution).
    • Absolute proof unattainable; science is iterative.
Study Types
  • Observational Studies
    • Measure variables in natural context; no manipulation.
    • Often field-based; suitable for complex systems impossible to replicate (ocean circulation, elephant lifespan).
    • Show correlation, not definitive causation.
  • Experimental Studies
    • Manipulate a single variable; include control vs. experimental groups.
    • Typically laboratory-based.
    • Can establish causation but may oversimplify real-world complexity.
Alternative Explanations – Critical Thinking Example
  • Observation: Suspect ran from scene and was covered in blood.
  • Scientific mindset: Generate alternate hypotheses (e.g., suspect discovered victim already bleeding and panicked; suspect tried to help and became bloody; actual killer fled earlier, etc.).
  • Purpose: Guard against single-cause bias; design studies (or investigations) that rule out alternatives.
Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications Mentioned
  • Funding long-term monitoring (e.g., CO₂) is crucial for detecting slow trends; public policy must value sustained science.
  • Diversity in science enriches question framing and societal relevance.
  • Scientific results inform—but do not dictate—moral or policy decisions; stakeholders must integrate data with values.
Real-World Relevance & Course Connections
  • Unit conversion skills appear in problem sets, literature (methods sections), and lab protocols.
  • GIS & spatial analysis skills applicable to environmental policy, conservation planning, urban design.
  • Understanding difference between correlation and causation essential for interpreting news articles, medical claims, climate reports.
  • Familiarity with hypothesis testing prepares students for designing capstone projects, internships, or independent research.
Numerical / Statistical References Recap
  • 4×4=16(squares)4 \times 4 = 16\,\text{(squares)}
  • 4×4×4=64(cubes)4 \times 4 \times 4 = 64\,\text{(cubes)}
  • 1000m×1000m=1000000m21\,000\,\text{m} \times 1\,000\,\text{m} = 1\,000\,000\,\text{m}^2
  • 10003=1000000000m31\,000^3 = 1\,000\,000\,000\,\text{m}^3
  • Practice solutions: 5000m; 5000000m2; 5000000000m35\,000\,\text{m};\ 5\,000\,000\,\text{m}^2;\ 5\,000\,000\,000\,\text{m}^3
Self-Study / Action Items
  • Complete & submit Canvas assignment (math conversions, best scientific question, write a hypothesis, alternate murder-scene explanations).
  • Optional: Watch supplemental videos + assignment on personal experience of nature.
  • Next lecture next week—have a great weekend!