chapter 3 fraud
Chapter 3: Legal, Regulatory, and Professional Environment
BU5510 Forensics & Fraud Examination
Dr. Patrick O'Brien
Module 1: Introduction
Prosecution of Fraud:
Fraud may be prosecuted in two ways: criminally or civilly.
Role of Forensic Accountants:
Forensic accountants are involved when legal issues pertain to money or fraudulent activity.
They play a crucial role in investigating and resolving claims of fraud.
Crime Prevention:
The fear of being caught is a major tool for preventing crime.
Citizens agree to follow laws as they perceive the system generally works, leading to societal benefits.
Criminal Justice System Statistics:
A significant number of criminal cases never go to trial or the criminal justice system.
Regulatory Bodies:
The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) monitor illegal activities and hold perpetrators accountable.
Module 2: The Rights of Individuals
Constitutional Amendments:
Individual rights related to due process are enshrined in four key amendments:
Fourth Amendment:
Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
Fifth Amendment:
Protects against self-incrimination; individuals cannot be compelled to testify against themselves.
Sixth Amendment:
Guarantees the right to legal counsel and the ability to confront witnesses.
Fourteenth Amendment:
Ensures due process and equal protection under the law.
Cooperation with Employers:
Employees are obliged to cooperate with employers during investigations, failing which they may face termination.
Federal and state laws offer protection to employees reporting illegal acts by employers, shielding them from retaliation.
Interviews
Employee Interviews & the Fifth Amendment:
An employee may be terminated for non-cooperation, even if invoking the Fifth Amendment.
Miranda Rights:
When in custody, an interviewee must be informed of:
Right to remain silent.
Statements can be used against them.
Right to an attorney, provided for free if not affordable.
Option to invoke rights at any time.
Private vs. Public Entity Interviews:
In private entity interviews, attorneys cannot be present.
Public entities must allow an attorney’s presence.
Valid Confessions:
Must be voluntary and not obtained through threats or coercion.
Promises of leniency are often not considered coercive.
Searches
Search Warrants:
Must be supported by probable cause and specifically outline persons, places, and items involved.
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy:
Individuals are granted a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain situations, although this is limited in the workplace.
Warrantless Searches:
Immediate searches may occur if law enforcement suspects a crime has been or will be committed.
Arrests and Searches:
Arrests can occur based on probable cause, allowing a search of the immediate area for officer safety and evidence protection.
Search of Motor Vehicles:
Vehicles have a lower expectation of privacy, allowing searches without warrants if contraband is suspected.
Surveillance
Surveillance Complexity:
More complex than interviews or searches; seldom done by fraud examiners.
Types of Surveillance:
Fixed-point surveillance (stakeouts)
Mobile surveillance
Videography
Audio or electronic surveillance (wiretapping)
Recording Conversations:
Any party may record conversations in 37 states.
Video Surveillance:
Legal in public spaces without violating privacy expectations.
Polygraph Testing:
Employers may only administer polygraphs if there's economic loss and reasonable suspicion.
Non-government employers cannot use polygraphs for employee screening.
Discharging a Suspected Wrongdoer from Employment
At-Will Employment:
Employment is typically at-will; both parties can terminate for various reasons.
Documentation of Termination:
Employers must document good cause, including:
Violation of written policies
Conduct harming business operations
Evidence-based investigation proving misconduct
Fair and objective investigation
Consistent treatment across similar incidents
Proportional punishment related to the offense
Civil Legal Action:
Employees can sue former employers even in cases of seemingly justified terminations.
Attorney-Client Privilege
Definition:
The attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications within a professional relationship.
Ownership of Privilege:
Belongs to the client, who can compel the attorney to maintain confidentiality.
Limitations:
Does not cover concealment of physical evidence or documents, nor future crimes or fraud.
Other Privileges
Attorney Work-Product Privilege:
Protects materials created by attorneys in anticipation of litigation; it aims to maintain trial integrity.
Physician-Patient Privilege:
Confidential communications for treatment are protected, but this privilege is waived once a medical condition is in question during litigation.
Marital Privileges:
Spousal immunity protects from testifying against a spouse regarding certain statements made during marriage, applicable even post-divorce.
Miscellaneous Privileges:
Confidential communications with clergy are recognized by most states.
No established legal privilege exists for accountant-client relationships.
Module 3: Probable Cause
Standard for Arrest/Warrant:
Probable cause is necessary for arrests, searches, and warrants.
Probable Cause Sources:
Can arise from affidavits, hearsay, or oral applications, especially in emergencies.
Witness vs. Target:
A witness is uninvolved, whereas a target is believed to have over a 50% chance of being charged with a crime.
Subject Behavior:
Subjects may exhibit unethical behavior but may not yet reach the threshold of criminality.
Module 4: Rules of Evidence
Importance of Evidence:
Essential for proof; without it, no convictions or civil judgments can occur.
Definition of Evidence:
Anything legally presented at trial to substantiate a claim and persuade a jury.
Criteria for Admissibility:
Must be relevant, trustworthy, and have a probative value that outweighs prejudicial effects.
Types of Evidence:
Testimonial
Real (documents)
Demonstrative
Circumstantial
Direct (i.e., eyewitness testimony)
Module 5: Criminal Justice System
Entry into the Criminal Justice System:
Individuals may enter via:
Warrantless arrests based on probable cause
Investigative filings leading to charges
Grand jury proceedings resulting in indictments
Grand Jury Function:
Decides if there’s sufficient evidence for trial.
Arraignment Hearing:
Charged individuals must appear before a judge without delay.
They are informed about charges and asked to plead (guilty/not guilty).
Module 5: Criminal Justice System (Cont.)
Trial Process:
If not opting for a bench trial, a jury trial is held.
Judges handle legal matters, while juries assess evidence to reach verdicts.
Sentencing Determination:
Sentences are decided by juries or judges based on jurisdiction.
Appeals Post-Conviction:
Convicted individuals can appeal verdicts or sentences.
Prosecution of Entities:
Not only individuals but businesses can be prosecuted to enforce accountability and cultural change.
Module 6: Civil Justice System
Civil Actions:
Private parties seek redress through civil actions for disputes or grievances.
Main goal: recover losses or punitive damages.
Role of Forensic Accountants:
Essential in civil justice, especially related to fraud claims and loss calculations.
Complaint and Pretrial Activity
Initiation of Civil Lawsuits:
Begins with the plaintiff filing a complaint in the correct jurisdiction.
Plaintiffs must assure the court of its jurisdiction and grounds for relief.
Fraud claims need to specify the nature of the fraud, the victim, and detailed misrepresentations.
Defendant's Response:
Typically, defendants reply denying liability, and may file counterclaims or seek dismissal.
Discovery Phase:
Each party explores the other's arguments, gathering evidence through various means.
Discovery Methods
Four Forms of Discovery:
Interrogatories:
Written questions requiring formal responses.
Requests to Produce Documents:
Exchange of relevant documents between parties.
Depositions:
Sworn testimony taken from parties based on evidence and documents.
Requests for Admission:
Parties agree on certain facts to streamline the case.
Negotiated Settlements
Settlement Negotiations:
Before trial, judges may encourage settlements based on evidence merit.
Fewer than 5% of civil cases reach trial.
Forms of Settlements:
Out-of-Court Settlements
Mediation
Arbitration
Negotiated Settlements (Cont.)
Out-of-Court Settlements:
Reach mutually agreeable resolutions after evaluating case merits.
Mediation Process:
An independent mediator assists both sides to negotiate voluntarily.
Arbitration Process:
Conducted by a neutral arbitrator resembling a judge, with the outcome decided based on case merits.
Arbitration can be binding (final decision) or nonbinding (potential for further negotiations).