Study Notes on the Supreme Court and the Marshall Court

Establishment of the Supreme Court

  • The Supreme Court was established by Article III of the United States Constitution.

    • Section 1: This section specifically establishes the Supreme Court and subordinate courts.

    • Section 2: Defines the types of cases the Supreme Court can hear, including:

    • Cases between states.

    • Cases involving the federal government in treaties and other matters.

    • Section 3: Includes the definition of treason and outlines the penalties for treason.

  • It is noteworthy that the Constitution does not mention:

    • The number of justices on the Supreme Court.

    • The duration of their service.

    • The power vested in the Supreme Court.

Early Years of the Supreme Court

  • Upon relocation to Washington, D.C., the Supreme Court operated out of the old Executive Building next to the White House due to a lack of space, highlighting its initial insignificance.

  • The early operations of the Supreme Court were minimal until the Marshall Court's influence.

Judiciary Act of 1789

  • During George Washington's presidency, the Judiciary Act of 1789 was enacted.

    • This act established:

    • Other federal courts.

    • The position of Attorney General.

Judiciary Act of 1801

  • Under President Thomas Jefferson's administration, the Judiciary Act of 1801 made further changes:

    • Reorganizing the federal courts.

    • Creating new judicial positions, which were filled just before Jefferson took office.

  • As Jefferson transitioned out of office, he began appointing judges loyal to his administration.

Concept of Justice

  • Justice is often symbolized as blind; statues commonly depict her with covered eyes. This reflects:

    • The ideal of impartiality in judicial decision-making, free from political bias.

  • Historical context reveals that political affiliations influenced judicial appointments from the inception of the Supreme Court.

John Adams and the Midnight Judges

  • As President John Adams was leaving office, he appointed a number of judges loyal to the Federalist agenda, referred to as the "Midnight Judges" because these appointments occurred during the final hours of his presidency.

    • All federal judges, including those appointed to the Supreme Court, serve for life.

  • Notable appointment: Chief Justice John Marshall

    • Relationship: He is Thomas Jefferson's cousin but disagrees politically.

    • Length of service: 34 years.

    • Political alignment: Federalist agenda.

    • Under his leadership, significant court decisions laid the foundation for the Supreme Court's future operations.

Significance of the Marshall Court

  • The Marshall Court is known for establishing key principles in judicial review and the relationship between federal and state laws.

  • Key Themes in Marshall Court Decisions:

    • Power consistently favored the federal government over state interests.

    • Federalists’ ideals of a strong central government were reinforced through Marshall's rulings.

  • Noteworthy cases during the Marshall Court:

    • These cases are essential for understanding the judiciary's development. A specific focus on three landmark decisions is required for academic evaluation.

Characteristics of Federalists vs. Democratic-Republicans

  • Federalists (supporters of Marshall's decisions):

    • Advocacy for a strong central government.

    • Loose interpretation of the Constitution.

  • Democratic-Republicans:

    • Strict constructionists favoring limited federal government and more power to states.

  • Despite the decline of the Federalist party, the legal principles set by John Marshall upheld Federalist values, creating historical implications for federal authority.

Patterns in Judicial Decisions

  • Recognizing patterns in political decisions is crucial for understanding the implications of the Marshall Court's rulings:

    • When evaluating decisions, consider whether they favor Federalists or Democratic-Republicans.

    • Analyzing historical contexts and ideological alignments aids in understanding judicial outcomes.

Collaborative Learning Activity

  • Each group is assigned to research a specific case from the Marshall Court, focusing on the following:

    • Year of the case.

  • This collaborative effort will deepen the understanding of the significant impacts of the Marshall Court on American law and governance.