Comparative Politics Study Notes
Getting Into Comparative Politics
Overview of Comparative Politics
Scholars in comparative politics seek to answer questions related to political, social, and economic changes primarily at the domestic or national level.
Key examples of large-scale change include:
Social Revolutions: E.g., French Revolution (1789), Russian Revolution (1917), Chinese Revolution (1949).
Nation-Building
Economic Transformation and Development: Transition from rural economies to capitalist-industrial economies.
Political Development: Particularly the process of democratization.
Fundamental Questions in Comparative Politics
Why do social revolutions occur, and why are some successful while others fail?
Why did some countries industrialize earlier than others?
Why have some countries democratized while others remain nondemocratic?
Additional thought-provoking questions include:
Why does the U.S. have a high number of gun homicides?
Why are there still many impoverished countries?
Why do some protests succeed while others fail?
Why do U.S. students perform poorly in international math and science tests?
The Importance of Questions in Comparative Politics
The field values inquiry, as the quality of questions is crucial to understanding complex phenomena.
Answers in Comparative Politics
Finding answers encompasses a significant part of the discipline. Answers can range from persuasive to unconvincing.
Example: Gun Violence in the U.S.
Director Michael Moore attributes high gun violence to a "culture of fear," arguing it creates a cycle of violence.
This argument raises questions about validity and alternative explanations.
Objective of the Field
Comparative politics provides conceptual and analytical tools for examining various social issues, including gun violence.
It is applicable to a broad range of problems, from healthcare systems to social inequality and drug legalization.
What Is Comparative Politics?
Definition:
"Comparative politics is the study of politics in foreign countries." [Zahariadis 1997, p. 2]
Encompasses both methods (comparison/comparative analysis) and subjects (political phenomena within states).
Separation from International Relations (IR):
Comparative politics focuses on domestic dynamics; IR emphasizes external relations among states.
The definition does not exclude the U.S. from comparative politics, as it is also a state.
Key Terms
State: A legal entity with permanent population and defined territory, capable of government control.
Nation: A group of people with a shared identity, not necessarily tied to a state.
Nation-State: A state where most of the population shares a common identity, though true examples are debated.
The Complexity of Definitions
Definitions shape what is included in the field of study.
Questions arise about the relevance of economic, cultural, and social phenomena to politics.
Understanding the interplay of domestic and external forces in politics is crucial.
Approaches and Challenges in Comparative Politics
Can politics be studied in isolation from external influences?
Importance of defining boundaries and preceding questions regarding politics and economics, etc.
Need for cohesive frameworks to study comparative politics effectively.
Historical Development of Comparative Politics
Early studies defined politics narrowly, focusing on formal institutions. Expansion in the 1950s led to broader definitions, accounting for informal and brute forces.
Methodology of Comparative Politics
The comparative method highlights the need to define important variables and relationships among them.
Importance of historical context in comparative analysis:
Politics is a part of historical, cultural, economic, and societal processes.
The role of political context in shaping behaviors and outcomes.
Examples of Comparative Politics
Analyzing gun homicide rates in the U.S. compared to Canada, where both share attributes but differ significantly in gun laws and resulting violence rates.
Methodological Approaches
Most Similar Systems Design (MSS): Compare similar social systems while varying key factors.
Most Different Systems Design (MDS): Compare different systems that share similar outcomes, looking for common causes.
Method of Agreement (MoA): Focus on common factors in cases sharing an outcome to identify causation.
Critical Thinking in Comparative Politics
Importance of approaching analysis with open-mindedness.
Recognizing and overcoming biases is essential for effective comparative analysis.
Comparative analysis aids in critical thinking by forcing reflection on assumptions and interpretations.
Learning Through Comparison
Comparative practices encourage the development of analytical and evaluative skills.
Summary of Steps in Comparative Analysis
Choose relevant cases based on clearly defined criteria.
Consider both similarities and differences in units of analysis.
Utilize each case's unique context for deeper understanding of broader systematic phenomena.
Address the complexity of causation and the role of historical factors in political outcomes.