The morality of abortion involves questions about the nature and moral status of the fetus, including its rights and how they compare to those of adult persons.
Key questions include defining abortion and its relation to murder, and understanding the rights of the pregnant person in relation to the fetus.
The morality and legality of abortion should be kept distinct.
Mary Ann Warren
Warren's argument:
It is wrong to kill an innocent human being.
Fetuses are innocent human beings.
Therefore, it is wrong to kill fetuses.
Warren distinguishes between the moral and genetic senses of "human being."
Moral sense (personhood): intrinsic worth, rights, protected moral status.
Genetic sense: merely being genetically human; tissue masses are genetically human but not persons.
Characteristics of being a human being in the moral sense:
Consciousness
Reasoning
Self-motivated activity
Capacity to communicate
Presence of self-concepts
Warren argues that a being must meet a minimum threshold of these criteria to have moral status. Fetuses do not meet these criteria, thus abortion is permissible.
Problems with Warren's Argument
Many adults with mental and physical challenges, as well as small children and babies, may not meet the majority of Warren's criteria.
Some non-human animals meet several of these criteria, potentially displaying greater capacities than some human persons, which complicates assigning moral status based on these characteristics alone.
McMahan
McMahan focuses on how differences in capacity affect moral worth, especially between early and late-term abortions.
He questions who is harmed by an abortion.
He suggests that early abortions do not harm anyone because the early fetus lacks identity.
McMahan cites data suggesting no real fetal consciousness before 20-24 weeks.
He equates killing an early fetus with certain forms of contraception if the early fetus is just something without being someone.
He defines the wrong of murder as destroying a victim’s ability to pursue their time-relative interests.