Protein-Protein Interactions and Methods of Study

Protein-Protein Interactions

Overview

  • Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial for various cellular processes.

  • Types of Interactions:

    • Stable Interactions: These occur in formations like multisubunit enzymes and molecular machines (e.g., ribosomes).

    • Transient Interactions: Temporary interactions occurring during processes like enzyme reactions and posttranslational modifications.

Effects of Protein-Protein Interactions

  • Kinetic Properties Alteration: These interactions can influence enzyme complex kinetics, as seen in allosteric effects exemplified by hemoglobin.

  • Binding Site Formation: New binding sites or enzyme active centers can form at the interface of interacting protein subunits.

  • Protein Inactivation: Examples include placental RNase inhibitor affecting RNase A activity.

  • Changes in Localization and Specificity: PPIs can alter a protein’s cellular location or its substrate specificity.

Evolutionary Advantages of Multisubunit Proteins

  • Economic Assembly: Easier to construct proteins from smaller subunits (e.g., viral coats) compared to large, complex proteins with repeated domains.

  • Interchangeable Partners: One protein can interact with different partners, reducing the need for diverse multidomain proteins.

  • Reduction of Synthesis Errors: Smaller subunits lead to fewer synthesis errors.

  • Cellular Assembly Efficiency: Subunits can assemble in appropriate cellular environments and combinations for specific functions.

Studying Protein-Protein Interactions

Identification Methods
  • Methods include physical, molecular biological, and genetic techniques.

  • Experimental approaches evaluate strength, specificity, and kinetics of PPIs.

  • Functional assays can further study their physiological roles.

Pull-Down Assays (in-vitro)

Overview
  • Affinity Pull-Down: Used to study stable interactions with purified tagged proteins, including GST, maltose, hexaHis, and FLAG.

  • High specificity and sensitivity, can detect interactions with affinities as weak as 10510^{-5} M.

  • Confirmation of suspected interactions and discovery of new ones.

  • Map interacting domains, non-quantitative/semi-quantitative

  • Problems: non-physiological conditions, do not detect interactions that require posttranslational modifications and false positives/negatives; independent in vivo confirmation needed.

GST Pull-Down Example
  • GST-fused bait protein incubated with potential interacting prey.

  • Complexes bound to glutathione resion if formed, non-interacting proteins are washed away; complexes analyzed via SDS gel electrophoresis or Western blot.

  • Example: GST-Brk pulldown interaction with Drosophila repressors dCtBP and Groucho showed mutation effects on binding.

Immunoprecipitation

  • Purpose: To study interactions in physiological conditions in cells.

  • Requirements: Antibodies, tagged proteins that are expressed/overexpressed, may not reflect physiological levels.

  • Cannot distinguish direct from indirect interactions; requires careful controls including antibody specificity or that interactions are not artificially induced during cell lysis (mutant proteins, knockdowns).

Controls in Immunoprecipitation
  • Show co-precipitated protein is precipitated by AB itself - monoclonal ABs.

  • Establish AB does not recognize the co-precipitated protein - use independently prepared AB, cell lines lacking antigen.

  • Establish interaction is direct and not through another protein - pull-down assay

  • Establish interaction takes place in the cell - investigate co-localization in cell

Advanced Interaction Discovery Methods

  • Techniques: Tandem affinity purification, protein microarrays, phage display, yeast two-hybrid.

  • High rates of false positives/negatives require follow-up verification.

Quantitative Methods for Studying PPIs

General Methods
  • In vitro assays to quantify interaction strength, typically measured with dissociation equilibrium constant KdK_d.

  • Determine KdK_d by an assay that measures [AB] complex concentration or concentration of Afree/Bfree or concentration of Atotal and Btotal

Direct vs. Indirect Methods
  • Direct: Gel filtration, equilibrium dialysis. = measure actual concentration of bound and free proteins

  • Indirect: Optical and enzymatic methods (e.g., ELISA). = imply concentrations from a signal that has been obtained in the experiment

Assays Available in Labs
  • Common Lab Assays:

    • Fluorescent assays utilizing changes in fluorescence upon binding.

      • Tryptophan: enhance or quench fluorescence upon interaction or external fluorophore covalently bound to protein

    • Pull-down assays, gel shift, and ELISA.

Specialized Assays Requiring Equipment
  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Measures interaction in solution (requires considerable protein, limited in KdK_d range).

  • Fluorescence Depolarization: Measures binding in solution, requires fluorescent labeling that may affect binding

  • Microscale Thermophoresis: Tracks diffusion changes in thermal gradients with fluorescently labeled components.

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Measures binding kinetics by observing refractive index changes at a sensor surface upon analyte binding.

Indirect Experimental Methods

  • Assumes measured signal is directly proportional to the concentration of product

  • The equation establishes fractional saturation of binding reactions and adopts extinction coefficients for quantification.

  • FS = (OB-O0)/(Osat-O0)

    • OB: signal when protein is at certain concentration

    • O0: signal when protein is not present

    • Osat: signal at saturation of the reaction (all protein bound)

ELISA

  • Steps in a conventional ELISA assay to demonstrate protein associations (X to Y):

    1. Coat wells with protein X.

    2. Block non-coated areas with BSA.

    3. Incubate with protein Y.

    4. Add and incubate with primary antibody against protein Y.

    5. Add secondary antibody conjugated with HRP and develop with colorimetric reagent.

Binding Affinity

  • Defined by reversible reactions and governed by the law of mass action.

    • Velocity of chemical reaction is proportional to the product of concentrations of reactants.

  • Binding affinity measured by strength of the REVERSIBLE interaction

  • Expressed as dissociation constant KdK_d.

Fractional Saturation

  • Defined for reversible reactions to help derive the relationship with total concentrations of proteins involved.

  • Rearranging results in equations relating KdK_d and fractional saturation (FS).

Outcomes of Titration Experiments

  • If [B]tot « KdK_d = almost no [AB] complexes

  • If [B]tot = KdK_d = 50% of [A] will be in complex [AB]

  • If [B]tot » KdK_d = most of A will be in complex

  • [B] ~[B}tot

  • Very difficult to measure concentration of free protein so you use in excess. Btot = whatever we add

  • Strength of interactions

    • KdK_d = nM to pM (10^-9 to 10^-12 M) = high affinity interactions

    • KdK_d =uM (10^-6 M) = moderate affinity interactions

    • KdK_d = mM (10^-3 M) = weak affinity interactions