Remedy of Compensatory Damages

Chapter 26: Remedy of Compensatory Damages

Learning Objectives

  • Understand the principle of compensatory damages for:
    • Physical injury to people
    • Damage to property
  • Understand the difference between general and special damages.
  • Understand the principle of mitigation of loss.
  • Understand the factors governing the grant of an injunction.

26.1 Compensatory Damages for Physical Injury and Damage to Property

  • In tort claims, courts can award successful claimants compensation for injuries suffered or damage to property.
  • The term for this award is damages.
  • Objective: The aim is to place the claimant in the original position as if the tort had not occurred, as far as money can facilitate that restoration.
    • Property Damage: Compensation is more straightforward, as loss can be calculated.
    • Personal Injury: Recovery is complex due to potential for ongoing effects.

26.1.1 Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Loss

  • Pecuniary Loss: This refers to losses that can be easily quantified in monetary terms.
    • Example: Cost of hiring a car while the claimants’ vehicle is under repair.
  • Non-Pecuniary Loss: This includes losses that are not strictly monetary.
    • Examples:
    • Pain and suffering due to the accident.
    • Loss of amenity or lifestyle changes, such as an inability to engage in sports.

26.1.2 Special and General Damages

  • Special Damages:
    • Defined as amounts that can be specifically calculated up until the trial date or settlement.
    • Examples include:
    • Vehicle repair costs.
    • Replacement hire costs.
    • Replacing damaged clothing or belongings.
    • Loss of earnings during recovery from the accident.
  • General Damages:
    • Include non-pecuniary losses and are forward-looking from the date of trial or settlement.
    • Include:
    • Compensation for pain and suffering.
    • Loss of amenity.
    • Future loss of earnings.
    • Future medical expenses, adapting a home or vehicle for disabilities, and specialist care.
    • These awards are somewhat speculative, and supporting evidence is required, including medical documentation detailing the impact of the accident.
    • Future losses are calculated annually and multiplied by the number of years the loss is anticipated.
    • Example Calculation: For five years of earnings at £25,000/year, total loss would equal £125,000.
    • The claimant must mitigate their loss; part-time work or reduced earnings may be deducted from the final award.

26.1.3 Lump Sums and Structured Settlements

  • Courts award lump sum payments for pain and suffering and loss of amenity.
  • A once-only award is provided, and claimants cannot return to court after the settlement is exhausted.
    • This could disadvantage a claimant whose condition worsens over time.
    • Conversely, a lump sum might unfairly favor defendants if the claimant’s situation improves.
  • The Damages Act 1996 allows for structured settlements:
    • Claim parties may agree that part of the damages is paid periodically (monthly or annually).
    • Annuities are typically created by the defendant's insurer to facilitate payments.
    • Payments may be for a limited time (e.g., ten years) or for the claimant's life, and are subject to reassessment for inflation.
    • This type of arrangement ultimately benefits claimants with deteriorating conditions and fairly limits defendants to paying only while necessary.
    • Courts hold no power to mandate structured settlements.

26.2 Mitigation of Loss

  • Claimants must minimize their losses within reasonable bounds, which is known as mitigation of loss.
    • Example: Claimants cannot seek private treatment costs if comparable NHS treatment is available.
  • For property damage:
    • Claims for the cost of replacing irreparable property can be made, but opting for a costlier replacement is not permitted.

Case Study 1: Damage to Hair and Hair Loss

  • Incident: A regular salon client underwent a treatment that led to severe hair loss and scalp issues.
  • The treatment deviated from established processes causing hair damage.
  • Post-treatment reports indicated physical and emotional distress, prompting the claimant to seek damages.
  • Outcome: The claimant received £5,750 as a full and final settlement.
    • Source for reference: JMW Law.

26.3 Examples of Damages Awards

  • Activity: Analyze three case examples and consider the fairness of awards.
    • Questions to deliberate:
    1. Was the award fair?
    2. What compensation would you accept if a similar incident occurred to a family member?
    3. Can the tort principle of claimant restoration be applied?

Case Study 2: Delay in Treatment Results in Brain Damage

  • Scenario: A woman awarded £5 million after an ambulance delay due to a mistaken designation of her address leading to brain damage.
  • Circumstances: Emergency treatment delayed by 100 minutes, causing cardio issues.
  • Current Care: Requires constant care due to the accident.
  • Award: £1.4 million lump sum with ongoing payments.
    • Source for reference: Worthingtons Law.

Case Study 3: Broken Leg in Golf Buggy Accident

  • Incident: Claimant thrown from a golf buggy, resulting in severe leg injury and loss of flesh.
  • Dispute: There was contention over claimant actions versus the defendant’s driving.
  • Settlement: Finalized payment of £27,987.50 was made out of court.
    • Source for reference: JMW Law.

26.4 Injunctions

  • Injunctive Relief: After damages, the second most common remedy in torts is an injunction.
    • Definition: A court order directing a party to do or cease doing an action.
  • Contempt of Court: Failure to obey such orders can result in penalties, including fines or imprisonment (up to two years).
  • Types of Injunctions:
    • Provisional Injunctions: Temporary orders during litigation.
    • Perpetual Injunctions: Permanent orders preventing further nuisance behaviors.
    • Mandatory Injunctions: Require a party to undertake specific actions.
  • Recent Case Impact: The Supreme Court's ruling in Coventry v Lawrence encourages a more flexible approach, potentially limiting the availability of injunctive relief in favor of damages in less severe cases.

Case Study 4: Injunction Granted

  • Example: An injunction against a Birmingham tenant responsible for nuisance behavior affecting local residents.
  • Conditions: The injunction prohibits the tenant from engaging in violent or threatening behaviour and visiting specific areas.
    • Breached conditions could lead to immediate arrest and court return within 24 hours.
    • Source for reference: Birmingham Newsroom.

Check Your Understanding

  • Scenario: Peter's serious road accident leading to serious injuries and potential for substantial damages.
  • Legal Advice: Consider the principles a judge will use to award damages, potential claims, and structure of compensation payments.

Summary

  • Damages are the standard remedy in tort aimed at restoring the claimant's pre-tort position as effectively as money can facilitate.
  • Mitigation of loss is a responsibility of the claimant.
  • Special Damages: Calculated losses up to the court date.
  • General Damages: Future-facing losses, encompassing earnings and medical costs.
  • Compensation can be structured as lump sums or periodic payments.
  • Injunctions serve as a key remedy for specific legal disputes, compelling or prohibiting actions.