Remedy of Compensatory Damages

Chapter 26: Remedy of Compensatory Damages

Learning Objectives

  • Understand the principle of compensatory damages for:

    • Physical injury to people

    • Damage to property

  • Understand the difference between general and special damages.

  • Understand the principle of mitigation of loss.

  • Understand the factors governing the grant of an injunction.

26.1 Compensatory Damages for Physical Injury and Damage to Property

  • In tort claims, courts can award successful claimants compensation for injuries suffered or damage to property.

  • The term for this award is damages.

  • Objective: The aim is to place the claimant in the original position as if the tort had not occurred, as far as money can facilitate that restoration.

    • Property Damage: Compensation is more straightforward, as loss can be calculated.

    • Personal Injury: Recovery is complex due to potential for ongoing effects.

26.1.1 Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Loss
  • Pecuniary Loss: This refers to losses that can be easily quantified in monetary terms.

    • Example: Cost of hiring a car while the claimants’ vehicle is under repair.

  • Non-Pecuniary Loss: This includes losses that are not strictly monetary.

    • Examples:

    • Pain and suffering due to the accident.

    • Loss of amenity or lifestyle changes, such as an inability to engage in sports.

26.1.2 Special and General Damages
  • Special Damages:

    • Defined as amounts that can be specifically calculated up until the trial date or settlement.

    • Examples include:

    • Vehicle repair costs.

    • Replacement hire costs.

    • Replacing damaged clothing or belongings.

    • Loss of earnings during recovery from the accident.

  • General Damages:

    • Include non-pecuniary losses and are forward-looking from the date of trial or settlement.

    • Include:

    • Compensation for pain and suffering.

    • Loss of amenity.

    • Future loss of earnings.

    • Future medical expenses, adapting a home or vehicle for disabilities, and specialist care.

    • These awards are somewhat speculative, and supporting evidence is required, including medical documentation detailing the impact of the accident.

    • Future losses are calculated annually and multiplied by the number of years the loss is anticipated.

    • Example Calculation: For five years of earnings at £25,000/year, total loss would equal £125,000.

    • The claimant must mitigate their loss; part-time work or reduced earnings may be deducted from the final award.

26.1.3 Lump Sums and Structured Settlements
  • Courts award lump sum payments for pain and suffering and loss of amenity.

  • A once-only award is provided, and claimants cannot return to court after the settlement is exhausted.

    • This could disadvantage a claimant whose condition worsens over time.

    • Conversely, a lump sum might unfairly favor defendants if the claimant’s situation improves.

  • The Damages Act 1996 allows for structured settlements:

    • Claim parties may agree that part of the damages is paid periodically (monthly or annually).

    • Annuities are typically created by the defendant's insurer to facilitate payments.

    • Payments may be for a limited time (e.g., ten years) or for the claimant's life, and are subject to reassessment for inflation.

    • This type of arrangement ultimately benefits claimants with deteriorating conditions and fairly limits defendants to paying only while necessary.

    • Courts hold no power to mandate structured settlements.

26.2 Mitigation of Loss

  • Claimants must minimize their losses within reasonable bounds, which is known as mitigation of loss.

    • Example: Claimants cannot seek private treatment costs if comparable NHS treatment is available.

  • For property damage:

    • Claims for the cost of replacing irreparable property can be made, but opting for a costlier replacement is not permitted.

Case Study 1: Damage to Hair and Hair Loss
  • Incident: A regular salon client underwent a treatment that led to severe hair loss and scalp issues.

  • The treatment deviated from established processes causing hair damage.

  • Post-treatment reports indicated physical and emotional distress, prompting the claimant to seek damages.

  • Outcome: The claimant received £5,750 as a full and final settlement.

    • Source for reference: JMW Law.

26.3 Examples of Damages Awards

  • Activity: Analyze three case examples and consider the fairness of awards.

    • Questions to deliberate:

    1. Was the award fair?

    2. What compensation would you accept if a similar incident occurred to a family member?

    3. Can the tort principle of claimant restoration be applied?

Case Study 2: Delay in Treatment Results in Brain Damage
  • Scenario: A woman awarded £5 million after an ambulance delay due to a mistaken designation of her address leading to brain damage.

  • Circumstances: Emergency treatment delayed by 100 minutes, causing cardio issues.

  • Current Care: Requires constant care due to the accident.

  • Award: £1.4 million lump sum with ongoing payments.

    • Source for reference: Worthingtons Law.

Case Study 3: Broken Leg in Golf Buggy Accident
  • Incident: Claimant thrown from a golf buggy, resulting in severe leg injury and loss of flesh.

  • Dispute: There was contention over claimant actions versus the defendant’s driving.

  • Settlement: Finalized payment of £27,987.50 was made out of court.

    • Source for reference: JMW Law.

26.4 Injunctions

  • Injunctive Relief: After damages, the second most common remedy in torts is an injunction.

    • Definition: A court order directing a party to do or cease doing an action.

  • Contempt of Court: Failure to obey such orders can result in penalties, including fines or imprisonment (up to two years).

  • Types of Injunctions:

    • Provisional Injunctions: Temporary orders during litigation.

    • Perpetual Injunctions: Permanent orders preventing further nuisance behaviors.

    • Mandatory Injunctions: Require a party to undertake specific actions.

  • Recent Case Impact: The Supreme Court's ruling in Coventry v Lawrence encourages a more flexible approach, potentially limiting the availability of injunctive relief in favor of damages in less severe cases.

Case Study 4: Injunction Granted
  • Example: An injunction against a Birmingham tenant responsible for nuisance behavior affecting local residents.

  • Conditions: The injunction prohibits the tenant from engaging in violent or threatening behaviour and visiting specific areas.

    • Breached conditions could lead to immediate arrest and court return within 24 hours.

    • Source for reference: Birmingham Newsroom.

Check Your Understanding

  • Scenario: Peter's serious road accident leading to serious injuries and potential for substantial damages.

  • Legal Advice: Consider the principles a judge will use to award damages, potential claims, and structure of compensation payments.

Summary

  • Damages are the standard remedy in tort aimed at restoring the claimant's pre-tort position as effectively as money can facilitate.

  • Mitigation of loss is a responsibility of the claimant.

  • Special Damages: Calculated losses up to the court date.

  • General Damages: Future-facing losses, encompassing earnings and medical costs.

  • Compensation can be structured as lump sums or periodic payments.

  • Injunctions serve as a key remedy for specific legal disputes, compelling or prohibiting actions.