Antitrust Policy and Regulation Study Notes

Antitrust Policy and Regulation Overview

  • Purpose of Antitrust Policy:

    • Prevent monopolization

    • Promote competition

    • Achieve allocative efficiency

Major Antitrust Laws

  • Sherman Act (1890)

  • Clayton Act (1914):

    • Outlaws price discrimination

    • Prohibits tying contracts and stock acquisition

    • No interlocking directorates

  • Federal Trade Commission Act (1914):

    • Cease-and-desist order

  • Wheeler-Lea Act (1938)

  • Celler-Kefauver Act (1950)

Antitrust Policy Issues

  • Monopoly Behavior vs. Structure:

    • Significant cases: Standard Oil (1911), U.S. Steel (1920)

    • Concepts: Rule of reason, Relevant market (DuPont cellophane case, 1956)

  • Enforcement Issues

Effectiveness of Antitrust Laws

  • Key Cases: AT&T, Microsoft

  • Types of Mergers:

    • Horizontal, Vertical, Conglomerate

  • Herfindahl Index

  • Per se violations: Price fixing, Price Discrimination, Tying Contracts

Industrial Regulation

  • Natural Monopolies:

    • Economies of scale

    • Sectors: Public utilities (electricity, water, gas)

  • Solutions for Better Outcomes:

    • Public ownership, Public regulation, Public interest theory

Main Regulatory Commissions

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1930):

    • Jurisdiction: Electricity, gas, water-power

  • Federal Communications Commission (1934):

    • Jurisdiction: Telecommunication services

  • State Public Utility Commissions:

    • Jurisdiction: Utilities (electricity, gas, telephones)

Deregulation

  • Started: 1970s

  • Benefits: Large net benefits for consumers and society

  • Deregulated Industries: Airlines, Railroads, Telecommunications, Electricity

Social Regulation

  • Addresses:

    • Conditions of production

    • Impact on society

    • Physical qualities of goods

  • Scope: Applied universally across all industries

Level of Social Regulation

  • Optimal Level: Balancing support and criticisms

  • Key Reminders:

    • No free lunch

    • Less government not always better than more