EMPLOYMENT

In many workplaces, creativity and imagination are becoming more

valued than technical expertise. Why is this the case? Is this a

positive or negative development?

Many individuals claim that if given a choice between a work-free lifestyle and an overly demanding work routine, people would invariably opt for a life completely devoid of labor. From my perspective, while spending too much time working can put a severe psychological strain on individuals, I firmly disagree with the opinion that a life without work is the ideal choice, since professional occupation is essential to satisfy personal financial needs and maintain social connections.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that an excessive working schedule can have a negative influence on individuals’ well-being. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, driven by intense corporate competition, many employees are forced to dedicate an overwhelming block of time to accomplish their workload. Consequently, when workers are frequently deprived of the time to relax or engage in physical activities, they are highly susceptible to chronic illnesses, severe burnout, and a pessimistic outlook. For instance, the corporate environment in several developed nations, such as Japan, has long witnessed a tragic surge in Karoshi—sudden death due to overworking—which effectively discourages the younger generation from adopting an intensive working lifestyle. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea of eliminating work entirely, because completely avoiding labor can lead to a sense of inadequacy and severe financial instability.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that engaging in a reasonable career plays a vital role in ensuring a high quality of life. This is because employment is an indispensable tool that enables individuals to earn a stable income, allowing them to satisfy their daily expenses, cover monthly bills, and avoid unnecessary debt. Furthermore, being part of a professional environment allows people to cultivate social connections and foster meaningful relationships with colleagues and senior managers, which enhances their self-esteem and public spirit. For example, a large proportion of young adults in Vietnam actively engage in daily labor not only to secure their personal finances but also to expand their social networks and contribute to the national GDP. Therefore, maintaining a balanced professional career is an optimal way to foster long-term social stability.

In conclusion, although spending too much time working can trigger mental health problems and physical exhaustion, I strongly believe that a life completely without work is a negative path. Striking an optimal work-life balance remains the most sustainable solution to help individuals earn financial independence and maintain healthy social connection, creating a reliable and stable society.

Task 2: Some people think that success in life comes from hard

work and determination, while other think that there are more

important factors such as money and appearance. Discuss both

views and give your opinion.

Many individuals claim that personal achievements are primarily driven by diligent labor and perseverance, while others suggest that external elements, including financial backgrounds and physical looks, play a more vital role in determining success. From my perspective, although initial capital and an attractive appearance can provide substantial advantages, I firmly believe that long-term success is ultimately decided by individual diligence and determination.

On the one hand, there are compelling grounds why many people believe that financial resources and physical looks are the key keys to success. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, possessing a large amount of money allows individuals to access high-quality education and modern facilities, which enables them to accomplish their career goals more easily without financial strain. Furthermore, an attractive appearance can effectively help people capture others' attention and create a positive impression in competitive fields such as entertainment or customer service. For instance, a large proportion of influencers and celebrities on social media platforms in Vietnam tend to utilize their privileged backgrounds and enhanced images to attract mass viewership and secure lucrative contracts. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to guarantee sustainable success, because without actual capabilities and continuous effort, individuals with only wealth and looks are highly susceptible to stagnation when facing severe corporate competition.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that hard work and determination are the most reliable pillars for sustainable achievements. This is due to the fact that individuals who possess strong willpower and a resilient public spirit are willing to allocate a block of time to cultivate specialized knowledge and upgrade their skills. Consequently, when encountering inevitable failures or market fluctuations, their determination acts as a deterrent against giving up, helping them manage to overcome challenges and achieve long-term breakthroughs. For example, many successful entrepreneurs and technology experts in Vietnam started their journeys from underprivileged backgrounds with minimal initial capital. Through intense labor and a relentless drive to satisfy their professional ambitions, they successfully optimized their business operations and contributed significantly to the national GDP. Therefore, relying on individual effort remains the optimal way to foster long-term personal stability and success.

In conclusion, while financial advantages and a favorable appearance can facilitate an easier start in life, I strongly believe that hard work and determination are far more critical. These intrinsic values not only empower individuals to mitigate external hardships but also drive them toward sustainable prosperity and meaningful achievements in a reliable society.

Task 2: If you want to be successful at work, you should have

high-level computer skills. Do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that mastering advanced computer skills is an indispensable prerequisite for achieving professional success in the modern workplace. From my perspective, while digital literacy is undeniably beneficial in the technology-driven era, I firmly disagree with the opinion that it is the sole or most critical determinant of career advancement, since professional success is ultimately decided by individual diligence, determination, and strong interpersonal skills.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that possessing high-level computer skills can provide substantial advantages in specific industries. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, driven by digital transformation and data-centric operations, many enterprises utilize complex software and automated systems to optimize their corporate productivity. Consequently, when employees allocate a block of time to master advanced technical tools, they can manage to handle an intensive workload with higher precision and speed, thereby mitigating operational errors. For instance, in fields such as information technology, financial analysis, or digital marketing, individuals who can proficiently operate specialized programs or interpret security reports can easily capture senior managers' attention and earn lucrative promotions. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that computer expertise guarantees success across all professions, as many sectors rely heavily on human-centric capabilities rather than technical algorithms.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that intrinsic determination and interpersonal skills remain the most reliable pillars for sustainable career achievements. This is due to the fact that technical skills can be easily trained and upgraded over time, whereas core values like a resilient public spirit, problem-solving abilities, and effective communication require continuous personal cultivation. In particular, a leader or senior manager needs to foster meaningful relationships with colleagues, negotiate with high-profile partners, and inspire their workforce, none of which can be accomplished by automated software. For example, a large proportion of successful entrepreneurs and corporate executives in Vietnam started their journeys from non-technical backgrounds. Through intense labor, unwavering determination, and the ability to expand social networks, they successfully drive corporate efficiency and contribute significantly to the national GDP. Therefore, prioritizing comprehensive personal attributes and soft skills is an optimal way to foster long-term professional stability and success.

In conclusion, although advanced computer skills can facilitate higher efficiency in data-driven tasks, I strongly believe that they are not the definitive factor for career success. Striking a balance between professional diligence, psychological resilience, and strong interpersonal connections remains the most sustainable path to help individuals achieve true breakthrough and prosperity in a reliable society.

Task 2: Some people prefer to have temporary jobs, which means

they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time

to do what they want. Is it a positive or negative development?

Many individuals currently show a preference for temporary employment, choosing to labor for only a few months annually and dedicate the remaining block of time to pursuing personal interests. From my perspective, while this career path allows people to satisfy their personal passions, I firmly believe that this is a highly negative development due to the severe financial strain it imposes on individuals and the adverse consequences it inflicts on long-term social stability.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that short-term employment can offer certain immediate benefits regarding personal freedom. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, driven by intense corporate competition, traditional full-time positions often require workers to handle an excessive workload, leading to severe burnout and chronic stress. Consequently, when individuals transition to temporary jobs, they can effectively mitigate intense workplace pressure and allocate a block of time to engage in recreational activities or travel. For instance, a small proportion of young adults in Vietnam choose to work as seasonal freelancers, which temporarily shields them from dangerous psychological strain and grants them the freedom to explore personal hobbies. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support this trend as a sustainable lifestyle, because the absence of a stable career can potentially lead to long-term financial instability and career stagnation.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that the proliferation of temporary labor represents a detrimental shift for both individuals and the wider community. This is because temporary positions lack essential financial security, such as health insurance, retirement funds, and fixed monthly salaries, which are indispensable tools to cover daily expenses and monthly bills. As a result, during months without active contracts, these workers are highly susceptible to acute financial strain and may easily fall into unnecessary debt. Furthermore, a workforce dominated by transient employees can disrupt corporate efficiency and undermine national economic growth, as companies must frequently waste resources on recruiting and retraining staff. For example, economic reports in several developed nations, such as Japan, have shown that an over-reliance on part-time and temporary workers weakens the national labor index and diminishes the stability of the social security system. Therefore, maintaining stable, full-time careers remains the optimal way to foster long-term social stability.

In conclusion, although working a few months a year can temporarily alleviate psychological pressure and grant individuals greater personal autonomy, I strongly believe that the rise of temporary employment is an disadvantageous milestone. This trend not only exposes individuals to hazardous financial vulnerabilities but also threatens corporate efficiency and the sustainable development of a reliable society.

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to

take on people who are innovative and able to work independently

while others consider they should recruit people who are able to

work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give

your opinion.

Many individuals claim that enterprises should prioritize recruiting candidates who possess innovative minds and the capacity to operate independently, while others suggest that prioritizing team players who strictly follow instructions is more beneficial for corporate productivity. From my perspective, while both attributes are undeniably valuable, I firmly believe that a combination of both worker categories is the optimal way to maximize corporate efficiency and foster long-term business stability.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why some corporate executives prefer to take on innovative and independent employees. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, driven by rapid digital transformation and intense market competition, companies must constantly launch innovative products to satisfy consumers' shifting demands. Consequently, when an enterprise allocates a block of time to attract self-reliant professionals who can manage to handle an intensive workload without constant supervision, they can easily brainstorm breakthrough solutions and mitigate operational stagnation. For instance, in technology-centric fields such as information technology or digital marketing in Vietnam, highly independent software developers or creative directors can proactively solve complex technical anomalies, thereby helping their organizations capture senior clients' attention and maintain a competitive edge.

On the other hand, the foundation for the alternative belief is that employees who follow corporate instructions and collaborate effectively in a team remain the reliable pillars for sustainable operational execution. This is because a large proportion of daily business operations depend heavily on standardized procedures and collective labor rather than individual brilliance. In particular, if a workforce is dominated by non-compliant individuals who refuse to follow protocols, it can generate internal friction and disrupt the overall organizational flow. For example, in manufacturing or traditional service sectors in Vietnam, strict compliance with safety regulations and seamless teamwork are mandatory to maintain quality control and elevate corporate efficiency. Therefore, hiring disciplined individuals who can easily adapt to a collaborative environment is essential to secure a reliable and stable corporate foundation.

In conclusion, while innovative and independent workers are crucial for driving creative breakthroughs, disciplined team players are equally indispensable for executing daily operations. Personally, I strongly believe that instead of favoring one over the other, modern companies should strike a balance by assigning innovative thinkers to R&D departments and compliant team workers to operational roles, which is the most sustainable path to achieve corporate prosperity in a competitive market.

In many countries, women are allowed to take maternity leave from

their jobs during the first months after the birth of their baby. Do the

advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In many nations, female employees are legally permitted to take maternity leave during the initial months following the childbirth. While this policy can temporarily disrupt corporate workflow, I firmly believe that its benefits comprehensively outweigh the drawbacks since it secures the physical and mental well-being of both mothers and infants, thereby fostering long-term social stability.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that granting extended maternity leave can inflict certain immediate challenges on employers. This can be attributed to the fact that when an organization allocates a block of time for female workers to absent from their duties, it can generate a sudden shortage of human resources. Consequently, other team members are frequently compelled to handle an intensive workload to fill the operational gap, which may spark internal friction or cause corporate efficiency to stagnate. For instance, in fast-paced sectors such as digital marketing or information technology in Vietnam, the temporary absence of key female personnel can disrupt project timelines and put a financial strain on enterprises due to the costs of recruiting and retraining temporary replacements. However, this drawback is minimal compared to the long-term values, as these operational disruptions can be mitigated through effective human resource planning.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that maternity leave offers profound and indispensable advantages for family welfare and societal development. This is because the postpartum period is a highly vulnerable phase when a mother requires absolute rest to recover from physical trauma and manage psychological pressure like postpartum depression. Furthermore, newborns need continuous parental supervision and breast milk during the first months to satisfy their nutritional needs and develop a resilient immune system. For example, the government in Vietnam enforces a mandatory six-month maternity leave policy, which has successfully enabled millions of working mothers to nurture their children appropriately without the fear of job loss. By safeguarding public health from the earliest stages of life, this intervention serves as an optimal way to reduce the burden on national healthcare systems and enhance the overall quality of life.

In conclusion, although maternity leave may create temporary operational obstacles for businesses, I strongly believe that the advantages of this practice far outweigh its shortcomings. Providing mothers with a secure block of time to care for their newborns is a vital investment that not only protects public health but also fosters a reliable and stable society.

Some people believe that the working week should be shorter and

workers should have a longer weekend. To what extent do you

agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that transitioning to a shorter working week and granting employees an extended weekend is a highly beneficial reform for the modern workforce. From my perspective, while this adjustment can temporarily reduce corporate productivity, I firmly agree with this opinion because it can effectively alleviate acute psychological pressure on workers and foster long-term social stability.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that shortening the working week can inflict certain immediate challenges on business operations. This can be attributed to the fact that when enterprises are compelled to reduce operational hours, the total amount of time dedicated to manufacturing products or servicing clients is heavily restricted. Consequently, employees may struggle to accomplish their intensive workload within a tighter schedule, which potentially leads to corporate efficiency stagnation and puts a financial strain on businesses due to delayed projects. For instance, in fast-paced and labor-intensive sectors such as information technology or manufacturing in Vietnam, a sudden reduction in weekly working hours can prevent companies from meeting strict deadlines, thereby diminishing their quarterly revenue. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that shorter weeks inherently destroy businesses, as organizations can optimize their workflow through digital transformation and automated systems to maintain stable output.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that prioritizing a longer weekend is an indispensable strategy to upgrade public health and stimulate the national economy. This is because a prolonged rest period provides workers with a sufficient block of time to completely satisfy their personal needs, recover from chronic workplace stress, and prevent hazardous burnouts. As a result, when employees return to their offices with a resilient public spirit and enhanced physical condition, they can manage to work with much higher precision and creativity, which ultimately drives long-term corporate productivity. Furthermore, an extended weekend allows individuals to spend money on recreational activities, travel, and domestic tourism, which can directly stimulate the national GDP. For example, economic reports in several developed countries like Japan have shown that companies adopting a four-day workweek successfully recorded a significant increase in employee satisfaction and a substantial surge in consumer spending. Therefore, implementing a shorter working week is the optimal way to foster sustainable social stability and professional stability.

In conclusion, although a shorter working week might initially disrupt the operational flow of some businesses, I strongly believe that the merits of an extended weekend are far more significant. Striking a healthy balance between labor and recreation is a vital mechanism that not only protects workers' mental well-being but also secures the sustainable economic prosperity of a reliable society.

For many people, the reason they work hard is to earn money. To

what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that the primary motivation behind working diligently is to accumulate financial wealth. While I acknowledge that earning a livelihood is an essential requirement for survival, I firmly disagree with the opinion that money is the sole purpose of hard work. From my perspective, professional dedication is also heavily driven by the desire to pursue personal passion and achieve a sense of fulfillment.

On the one hand, I recognize that securing financial resources is a compelling reason why many people must handle an intensive workload. This can be attributed to the fact that in modern society, individuals face an escalating cost of living, ranging from monthly bills to healthcare and educational expenses. Consequently, if workers do not devote themselves to their career to achieve higher salaries or bonuses, they may suffer from severe financial strain and fail to satisfy their families' basic needs. For instance, a large proportion of laborers in developing nations like Vietnam must engage in overtime work primarily to increase their disposable income and shield their households from economic instability. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that financial incentives are the only driver of human labor, as wealth alone cannot guarantee long-term professional stability or prevent workplace burnout if an individual lacks connection to their job.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that a significant number of people work hard to fulfill their intrinsic passions and attain self-actualization. This is because when individuals allocate a block of time to cultivate their expertise and solve complex professional challenges, they can derive a profound sense of purpose and pride that monetary compensation cannot buy. As a result, this psychological fulfillment enhances their workplace engagement and inspires them to make meaningful contributions to the community. For example, in fields such as information technology or scientific research in Vietnam, many highly skilled software developers or scientists consistently dedicate themselves to prolonged projects not merely for financial gain, but to discover breakthrough technological solutions. Therefore, dedicating energy to labor is the optimal way for individuals to validate their personal value, build mutual trust with senior colleagues, and achieve professional prosperity.

In conclusion, although earning money is an indispensable factor to mitigate economic pressure in daily life, I strongly believe that it is not the ultimate purpose of working hard. Striking a balance between financial security and personal fulfillment is a vital mechanism that enables individuals to sustain their productivity and contributes to a reliable and stable society.

It is a good idea for people to continue working in their old age, if it

is possible for them to do so. Do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that senior citizens should continue participating in the workforce during their old age if their health conditions permit. While I acknowledge that prolonged employment can limit job opportunities for the younger generation, I firmly agree with this opinion because continuing to work can effectively alleviate financial strain on national pension systems and enhance the overall well-being of the elderly.

On the one hand, I recognize that allowing elderly individuals to maintain their jobs can inflict certain challenges on the youth. This can be attributed to the fact that when senior employees occupy high-ranking positions for an extended period, corporations are frequently forced to allocate fewer vacancy slots for new applicants. Consequently, young graduates may encounter severe competition and struggle to secure appropriate employment, which potentially leads to high youth unemployment rates and organizational stagnation. For instance, in several highly competitive fields such as information technology or finance in Vietnam, the low turnover rate of senior personnel can sometimes delay the career advancement of junior workers. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that elderly workers destroy young people's prospects, as modern enterprises can expand their scale or design specialized consultancy roles for veterans, thereby mitigating internal friction and maintaining corporate efficiency.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that extending the working life of senior citizens offers profound advantages for both the national economy and individual health. This is because a large proportion of modern nations are confronting aging populations, which puts an immense financial strain on state budgets due to pension payouts. By encouraging healthy seniors to remain employed, governments can utilize their valuable expertise to satisfy market demands while reducing the burden on public welfare. Furthermore, continuing to work provides the elderly with a structured routine and a block of time to interact with society, which is an optimal way to prevent chronic mental illnesses such as depression or cognitive decline. For example, in developed countries like Japan, the government has adjusted retirement policies to encourage old citizens to continue working, which has successfully fostered their independent living and secured long-term social stability. Therefore, professional engagement in old age is a beneficial mechanism to achieve both personal fulfillment and economic sustainability.

In conclusion, although extending the retirement age may create temporary challenges for younger job seekers, I strongly believe that the merits of allowing elderly people to continue working are far more significant. This practice not only safeguards the physical and mental health of senior citizens but also contributes to building a reliable and stable society.

Đề may hôm nay 29.11 - Whether or not someone achieves their

aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree

or disagree?

Many individuals claim that luck is the primary determinant of whether a person can achieve their personal goals. While I acknowledge that fortuitous events can provide unexpected advantages in one's career, I firmly disagree with the opinion that success is mostly a product of chance. From my perspective, attaining one's objectives is heavily driven by professional dedication, rigorous preparation, and the ability to conquer complex challenges.

On the one hand, I recognize that luck can be a compelling factor that accelerates an individual's journey to success. This can be attributed to the fact that encountering favorable circumstances, such as being born into a wealthy family or meeting an influential mentor, can open up premium opportunities that are unavailable to others. Consequently, these fortunate individuals can easily access advanced facilities or secure high-ranking positions without enduring severe initial hardships. For instance, a small proportion of young entrepreneurs in Vietnam have managed to expand their start-ups rapidly because they happened to launch their products right during an unexpected surge in market demand. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that luck alone guarantees long-term achievements. Without genuine expertise and an intensive workload to sustain efficiency, individuals will inevitably fail to preserve their position or overcome inevitable market fluctuations.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that persistent hard work and meticulous skill cultivation are the decisive elements required to accomplish any ambition. This is because when individuals allocate a block of time to enhance their expertise and systematically solve professional challenges, they can build a robust foundation of capability that allows them to manipulate any circumstance to their advantage. As a result, this inner competence ensures professional stability and enables them to make meaningful contributions, which is far more reliable than waiting for random chance. For example, in competitive fields such as information technology in Vietnam, many highly skilled software developers or network engineers consistently invest their energy into master programming languages and analyzing system vulnerabilities. Their ultimate success is not derived from good fortune, but from thousands of hours of labor, which is the optimal way to build mutual trust with senior colleagues and achieve professional prosperity.

In conclusion, although random chance can act as a catalyst to mitigate initial difficulties in daily life, I strongly believe that luck is not the ultimate driver of personal accomplishment. Relying on self-determination, dedication, and resilience is the vital mechanism that enables individuals to achieve their aims and contributes to building a reliable and stable society.

Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and

determination, while others think that there are more important

factors such as money and appearance. Discuss both views and

give your opinion.

Many individuals claim that financial resources and physical appearance are the decisive factors in achieving success in life, while others believe that professional dedication and resilience are far more significant. Personally, I firmly agree with the latter view, as personal effort and determination are the sustainable foundations for long-term professional stability and fulfillment.

On the one hand, I recognize there are compelling reasons why some people believe that external factors like wealth and looks accelerate the journey to success. This can be attributed to the fact that in a highly competitive society, individuals possessing substantial financial backing can easily access advanced facilities, premium education, or secure high-ranking positions without enduring severe initial hardships. Furthermore, a polished physical appearance can effectively attract senior colleagues and exploit psychological appeal during job interviews, granting candidates an unfair advantage. For instance, in fields such as entertainment or marketing in Vietnam, many young influencers with attractive appearances manage to secure lucrative contracts rapidly. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that these factors guarantee permanent achievements. Without genuine expertise and an intensive workload to sustain efficiency, wealthy or attractive individuals will inevitably fail to handle complex professional challenges and maintain long-term mutual trust with partners.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that persistent labor and unwavering determination are the ultimate drivers of personal accomplishment. This is because when individuals allocate a block of time to cultivate their expertise and systematically solve organizational difficulties, they build a robust foundation of competence that allows them to overcome any socio-economic barrier. As a result, this inner resilience shields them from failure during unexpected market fluctuations, which is an optimal way to validate their personal value. For example, in the information technology sector in Vietnam, many highly skilled software developers and network administrators from underprivileged backgrounds consistently dedicate themselves to prolonged projects to discover breakthrough technological solutions. Their eventual success and high revenue are derived entirely from thousands of hours of rigorous labor and self-determination rather than random luck or initial privileges.

In conclusion, although possessing financial resources and an appealing appearance can mitigate initial difficulties in daily life, I strongly believe that hard work and determination remain the most substantial elements of success. Relying on intrinsic capability not only ensures professional prosperity for individuals but also contributes to building a reliable and stable society.

If people could choose between a life without work and spending

most of their time working, they could always choose not to work.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many individuals claim that if given the opportunity, people would invariably choose a lifestyle completely free of labor over spending most of their time working. While I acknowledge that avoiding a heavy professional workload can protect individuals from immediate workplace burnout, I firmly disagree with the opinion that people would always choose a life without work. From my perspective, maintaining a career is heavily driven by the desire to pursue personal passion, cultivate expertise, and achieve a sense of fulfillment.

On the one hand, I recognize there are compelling reasons why the idea of a life without work appeals to many individuals. This can be attributed to the fact that modern professions often subject employees to severe stress and financial strain due to rigid schedules and intense competition. Consequently, if people were allowed to abandon their jobs, they could instantly alleviate psychological pressure, escape a sedentary lifestyle, and allocate a block of time to personal recreation. For instance, a large proportion of young laborers in Vietnam often express a desire to retire early to shield themselves from chronic illnesses and anxiety disorders triggered by workplace demands. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that a completely idle life leads to long-term happiness. Without professional responsibilities and routine challenges, individuals will inevitably suffer from a profound sense of emptiness, an absence of direction, and a distorted outlook on their personal value.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that engaging in meaningful labor is the primary mechanism for individuals to attain self-actualization and build social connections. This is because when people dedicate their energy to a specific field, they are able to systematically solve complex challenges, improve their skills, and make meaningful contributions to their community. As a result, this professional engagement provides them with psychological fulfillment, validation, and professional stability, which random leisure cannot replicate. For example, in competitive fields such as information technology in Vietnam, many highly skilled software developers or network engineers consistently work long hours not merely to satisfy basic financial needs, but because they are genuinely inspired by technological innovation. Their dedication to labor is the optimal way to build mutual trust with senior colleagues, achieve professional prosperity, and feel connected to the development of society.

In conclusion, although a life without work may temporarily mitigate daily stress and provide immediate comfort, I strongly believe that people would not always choose complete idleness. Active participation in labor is an indispensable element that satisfies human psychology, validates personal identity, and contributes to building a reliable and stable society

In some countries, it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants

for their age. Is this a positive or negative development?

Many individuals claim that outlawing age-based discrimination in corporate hiring processes can create corporate challenges regarding adaptability. While I acknowledge that this regulation might initially require businesses to adjust their training models, I firmly believe that making it illegal to reject job applicants based on age is a positive development. From my perspective, this trend can protect vulnerable workers from severe financial strain and promote a healthier, more sustainable labor market.

On the one hand, I recognize there are compelling reasons why some people believe that banning age discrimination could potentially generate operational difficulties for enterprises. This can be attributed to the fact that older workers are often perceived to be less adaptable to rapid technological advancements or reluctant to handle an intensive workload. Consequently, if companies are legally compelled to recruit senior applicants, they might be deprived of the chance to secure tech-savvy young graduates who possess higher energy levels. For instance, some technology startups in Vietnam have voiced concerns that employing older staff members might slow down digital transformation and undermine corporate efficiency. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that age limits guarantee productivity. Without a diverse workforce combining seasoned expertise and youthful energy, businesses will inevitably fail to handle complex professional challenges, solve organizational difficulties, and maintain structural stability during unexpected market fluctuations.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that this legal reform is an optimal way to safeguard the livelihood of older generations and enhance overall economic growth. This is because prohibiting age restrictions enables older individuals to prolong their career journeys, leverage their extensive experience, and avoid the risk of sudden unemployment. As a result, they can continue to generate a stable disposable income, which effectively shields their households from financial strain and minimizes the state’s burden regarding healthcare and pension funds. For example, in competitive industries such as information technology or education in Vietnam, many highly skilled network administrators and senior educators from older age groups consistently dedicate their energy to large-scale projects. Their presence in the workforce is the optimal way to build mutual trust with junior colleagues, guide the younger generation, and maintain long-term corporate prosperity. Therefore, this legal trend stimulates national GDP by fully exploiting available human resources rather than leaving them unnoticed due to groundless biases.

In conclusion, although prohibiting companies from rejecting applicants due to age might impose certain training demands on employers, I strongly believe that this is a highly positive development. It not only ensures professional stability and social justice for aging citizens but also contributes to building a reliable and stable society.

Some people think that employers should not care about the way

their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their

work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that employers should disregard the dress code of their staff since the quality of work is the primary determinant of success. From my perspective, I firmly disagree with this opinion because maintaining a professional appearance can significantly improve corporate reputation and foster better self-discipline among employees.

Allowing staff to dress entirely according to their personal preferences can have a negative influence on a company’s professional image. This can be attributed to the fact that employees, especially those in front-line positions, act as the face of the organization when interacting with clients and business partners. In particular, since people often make instant judgments based on visual impressions, casual attire might be perceived as a lack of respect or professionalism, which could undermine trust. For instance, many major banking institutions in Vietnam often compel their staff to wear standardized uniforms or formal business attire to project a reliable and stable corporate image to customers, thereby securing high-value contracts. Therefore, workplace dress standards play an indispensable role in maintaining a business's reputation.

Furthermore, enforcing a proper dress code plays a vital role in enhancing productivity and professional behavior among workers. This is because the clothes individuals wear can shift their psychological state and mindset. When employees wear professional outfits, they are subconsciously reminded of their responsibilities, which encourages them to adopt a more serious attitude toward their assignments and minimize unnecessary distractions. In contrast, if an organization has weak regulations regarding appearance, a large proportion of workers tend to become overly relaxed, potentially leading to a sedentary or careless work attitude. For example, a number of tech companies in Japan, despite their dynamic environments, still require employees to adhere to smart-casual guidelines during working hours, which successfully prevents a drop in professional standards while maintaining operational discipline.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that employers should pay close attention to how their staff dress. A proper dress code can not only safeguard the corporate reputation during client interactions but also encourage higher self-discipline and work quality among employees, creating a highly professional and stable business environment.

Employers should give holidays of at least one month to employees

to encourage them to perform better at workplace. To what extent

do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals claim that employers should grant their staff at least one month of vacation to stimulate higher job performance. From my perspective, I firmly disagree with this opinion because an excessively long absence can disrupt operational workflows and generate significant financial strain for businesses.

Granting a continuous one-month holiday can have a negative influence on a company’s operational efficiency. This can be attributed to the fact that maintaining a stable workflow requires the daily presence and coordination of various departments. In particular, since many businesses operate on tight project deadlines and demand instant communication with clients, a month-long absence of key workers would cause severe delays and unfinished workloads. In contrast, if organizations implemented shorter, well-spaced breaks throughout the year, they would manage to help staff recover their energy without pausing critical business functions. For instance, a large number of tech corporations in Vietnam tend to strictly limit long annual leaves, choosing instead to distribute individual days off across quarters, thereby securing continuous project delivery and maintaining a reliable corporate image. Therefore, extended holiday periods can jeopardize the overall productivity of an enterprise.

Furthermore, enforcing a compulsory one-month vacation creates an unsustainable financial burden for employers. This is because businesses are still required to cover fixed overhead costs, including facility rent and basic insurance, while receiving no economic output from their absent workforce during this period. If governments or corporate policies compelled enterprises to pay full salaries for an entire month of non-work, a large proportion of small and medium-sized enterprises would face severe budget deficits, potentially leading to bankruptcy. For example, a number of dynamic companies in Japan, despite prioritizing employee well-being, often reject the concept of a consecutive month-long holiday; instead, they utilize optimized hybrid working models or brief seasonal breaks to prevent financial liability while safeguarding employees’ mental health. As a result, long vacations are an impractical financial strategy for boosting workplace performance.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that employers should not give holidays of at least one month to their staff. This practice can not only disrupt regular operational workflows but also trigger severe financial strain for businesses,

Some people think that large companies should pay higher salaries

to CEOs and executives, compared to other workers. Others think

that this suggestion would lead to unfair situations. Discuss both

views and give your opinion.

Many individuals claim that large enterprises should allocate higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to ordinary employees, while others believe that this practice would generate adverse consequences such as workplace unfairness. Personally, I firmly believe in the former view.

People claim that massive income disparities between executives and regular staff can cause psychological pressure and a sense of injustice in the workplace. This is because many lower-level workers often contribute significant time and effort to accomplish their daily workloads, yet they receive relatively low compensation. Since employees are frequently exposed to the luxurious lifestyles of their corporate leaders, a large proportion of staff may feel dissatisfied due to unhealthy comparison, leading to undermining their morale and self-esteem. For instance, many manufacturing companies in Vietnam often face high turnover rates among workers because the massive pay gap between managers and laborers triggers widespread resentment, reducing their overall productivity. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support because high executive compensation is directly tied to the extreme level of responsibility that leaders must bear to ensure the survival of the enterprise.

The foundation for my belief is that high salaries for CEOs and executives are essential to recruit and retain highly skilled individuals who can drive corporate growth. This is due to the fact that corporate leaders possess specialized expertise to utilize aggressive business strategies and make critical decisions during economic crises. In particular, since these executives are able to help their organizations optimize operations and secure high-value contracts, they can improve the company’s revenue and boost profits. As a result, ordinary workers can also enjoy job security and better workplace facilities funded by the high tax revenue and profits generated by these leaders. For example, a number of major technology corporations in Japan tend to offer substantial financial packages to their CEOs, which successfully motivates them to innovate and maintain operational discipline, leading to a safer market position and long-term benefits for the entire workforce. Therefore, offering high executive salaries is an optimal way to ensure business sustainability.

In conclusion, although huge wage gaps may negatively affect mental well-being by encouraging unhealthy comparisons among lower-tier employees, I strongly believe that prioritizing high compensation for executives is more substantial. It can not only reward leadership responsibility but also safeguard corporate profits and protect the livelihood of all workers, creating a reliable and stable business environment.

Task 2: In many countries, people need to leave their families and

friends to find jobs in other places. Do you think the advantages

outweigh the disadvantages?

Many individuals claim that migrating to other regions or countries for employment opportunities has become a common necessity in contemporary society. From my perspective, while I recognize that relocating for work can generate certain adverse consequences regarding personal relationships, I firmly believe that the advantages of this trend significantly outweigh its drawbacks. This phenomenon not only enables individuals to achieve professional stability but also serves as an optimal catalyst to improve their personal finances.

On the one hand, leaving one's family and social circle to pursue career opportunities can cause certain emotional and psychological strains. This can be attributed to the fact that when individuals relocate to an entirely unfamiliar environment, they are often deprived of immediate emotional support from their loved ones while handling an intensive workload. Consequently, facing cultural barriers and isolation without the comfort of friends can drive many young professionals to suffer from a pessimistic outlook and anxiety. For instance, a large number of workers moving from rural provinces to major economic hubs in Vietnam often experience severe psychological pressure and homesickness during their initial transition period. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that relocating entirely damages personal well-being. Thanks to the rapid development of advanced technology and social media platforms, individuals can easily utilize video calling and texting features to maintain social connections and share their stories with their relatives instantly, regardless of geographical distance.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that labor migration offers substantial benefits for career advancement and financial well-being. This is due to the fact that major domestic cities or developed countries often possess a mass concentration of international corporations and dynamic industries, which offer a wide range of high-paying jobs. As a result, by moving to these vibrant labor markets, workers can effectively upgrade their practical knowledge, refine their specialized expertise, and secure better revenue. For example, many young Vietnamese citizens who migrate to Japan for employment are able to work in professional environments, master new technologies, and accumulate significant capital. This allows them to manage personal finances effectively, clear unnecessary debts, and send remittances back to support their families. Therefore, relocating for employment is an optimal way to help individuals maximize their potential and build long-term career stability.

In conclusion, although relocating for work can trigger minor emotional challenges due to geographical isolation, I strongly believe that the benefits of career progression and financial security are far more substantial. Embracing this trend not only empowers individuals to overcome local professional barriers but also contributes to building a more prosperous and stable society.

(Đề 15/6) Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society

today. How important is it for people who want to succeed in life? Is

it a positive or negative characteristic?

Many individuals claim that ambition serves as a vital driving force for personal advancement in contemporary society. From my perspective, possessing a high level of ambition is an indispensable prerequisite for achieving professional stability, and I firmly believe that this trait is a highly positive characteristic because it stimulates economic growth and fosters human resources.

Ambition plays an extremely important role in guiding individuals toward significant success in life. This can be attributed to the fact that ambitious people often set clear, long-term goals and exhibit higher levels of perseverance when handling an intensive workload or facing unexpected failures. Consequently, instead of neglecting their professional growth or adopting a passive mindset, these individuals are constantly motivated to upgrade their practical knowledge, refine their skills, and overcome organizational difficulties. For instance, a large number of young professionals and entrepreneurs in Vietnam continuously dedicate their time to researching market trends and improving their specialized expertise, which enables them to secure high-paying jobs, achieve career advancement, and build financial stability in competitive industries.

Regarding its nature, while some people argue that excessive ambition can generate negative social consequences, I believe that it is fundamentally a positive characteristic. On the one hand, an over-ambitious mindset might put psychological pressure on individuals and harm their personal well-being. This is because when people are overly obsessed with rapid advancement or material wealth, they may suffer from chronic stress, a sense of inadequacy, and anxiety due to unhealthy comparisons with more successful peers. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that ambition is entirely detrimental. With proper self-regulation and a clear ethical framework, ambitious individuals can successfully channel their strong desires into constructive actions, manage personal pressures effectively, and maintain a healthy relationship with the surrounding community.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that a strong sense of ambition among citizens serves as an optimal catalyst to accelerate national development and foster a prosperous society. This is due to the fact that when a massive pool of highly ambitious and dynamic workers converges in the market, they are more likely to create innovative products, establish new businesses, and handle intensive challenges. As a result, these enterprises can significantly boost profits and generate massive tax revenue for governments, which can be subsequently redirected into public infrastructure and education. For example, many successful tech startups and corporate leaders in Vietnam, driven by a strong ambition to compete globally, have actively created numerous job opportunities, enhanced national productivity, and contributed substantially to the country's GDP. Therefore, fostering ambition not only empowers individuals to maximize their potential but also contributes to building a reliable, prosperous, and stable society.

22.06 (cpt- IDP): The older generations tend to have very traditional

ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However,

some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing

younger generations for modern hie. 'To what extent do vou agree

or disagree with this view?

Many individuals claim that traditional values preserved by older generations have become obsolete and fail to equip young people with the necessary skills for modern life. From my perspective, while I recognize that certain conventional mindsets may limit youthful potential in a fast-changing world, I firmly disagree with the overall statement. I believe that traditional principles remain an indispensable foundation to form moral discipline and foster a resilient public spirit.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why some people argue that traditional ideas about lifestyle and behavior are unhelpful nowadays. This can be attributed to the fact that the older generation often holds conservative viewpoints regarding career paths and strict social conformity, which may conflict with the nature of the modern digital economy. Consequently, if parents excessively force their children to adopt rigid paths, such as pursuing stable state-sector jobs instead of modern industries, it may stifle innovation and generate severe psychological pressure among teenagers. For instance, in several Asian societies, familial expectations to conform to customary professional standards have often driven young people to suffer from a sense of inadequacy and diminished self-esteem. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that all traditional values are completely detrimental. Without a clear understanding of foundational ethics, young individuals who are easily exposed to prevailing controversies on social media platforms will inevitably struggle to distinguish right from wrong, leading to irresponsible behaviors.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that traditional values provide a vital framework to protect the younger generation from modern psychological strain and social instability. This is because core principles taught by ancestors, such as filial piety, respect for community, and perseverance, teach youngsters how to handle an intensive workload and manage personal finances effectively. As a result, when facing the intense competition of contemporary society, young individuals can maintain a highly resilient spirit and avoid adopting a pessimistic outlook or anxiety. For example, in Vietnam, family structures that preserve traditional filial commitments often support young professionals through financial strains and emotional crises, enabling them to maintain professional stability. Traditional lessons about an active, disciplined lifestyle also discourage the younger generation from neglecting physical health or adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Therefore, inheriting ancestral wisdom is an optimal way to help young people cultivate genuine kindness and establish a healthier relationship with the surrounding community.

In conclusion, although certain rigid traditional ideas might cause minor friction due to generational gaps, I strongly believe that traditional values are highly beneficial in preparing youth for modern life. Embracing these core principles not only prevents young people from falling into modern moral decay but also contributes to building a reliable, prosperous, and stable society.

Task 2: Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to

study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do the

advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?

In recent years, an increasing number of young individuals have chosen to migrate from rural regions to metropolitan areas for employment and tertiary education. From my perspective, this trend is primarily fueled by the concentrated availability of career opportunities and academic facilities in urban centers, and I firmly believe that the advantages of this development significantly outweigh its disadvantages.

The massive influx of youth into major cities can be attributed to the search for better career prospects and advanced educational institutions. This is because most top-tier universities, multinational corporations, and specialized training centers are highly concentrated in urban areas, whereas rural areas often suffer from limited academic options and a lack of high-paying jobs. Consequently, if ambitious young individuals desire to cultivate practical skills, upgrade their knowledge, and achieve professional stability, relocating to metropolitan centers becomes an absolute necessity. For instance, a large number of students from various provinces in Vietnam consistently migrate to Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City every year to pursue academic excellence in prestigious institutions and seek lucrative job offers in competitive fields such as information technology or finance.

Regarding the overall impact, while this domestic migration can generate certain urban challenges, I believe that its benefits are far more substantial. On the one hand, a rapid population surge in cities might put a severe strain on urban infrastructure and public services. This can be attributed to the fact that overcrowding frequently triggers intense competition for affordable housing, traffic congestion, and a heavier burden on healthcare systems. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that urban migration is entirely detrimental. With proper governmental intervention and policy reform, such as expanding public transport networks and constructing affordable residential high-rises, metropolitan authorities can effectively accommodate the growing workforce, manage urban density, and maintain structural stability.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that this demographic shift serves as a vital catalyst to drive national economic growth and foster social mobility. This is due to the fact that when a massive pool of dynamic and highly skilled young workers converges in metropolitan centers, enterprises can successfully recruit top talent to handle an intensive workload and solve complex organizational difficulties. As a result, these businesses can significantly boost profits and generate massive tax revenue for the government, which can be subsequently redirected into public funds and rural development programs to upgrade countryside infrastructure. For example, many young professionals migrating to major economic hubs in Vietnam have actively contributed to large-scale corporate projects, enabling their families in rural hometowns to secure a stable disposable income and enjoy a better quality of life. Therefore, this trend not only empowers the younger generation to maximize their potential but also contributes to building a reliable, prosperous, and stable society.

In conclusion, the migration of young people to cities is primarily driven by the pursuit of superior educational and career opportunities. Although this movement might impose certain pressure on urban infrastructure, I strongly believe that its role in stimulating economic growth, fostering human resources, and accelerating national development represents a highly positive development.

Task 2 In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely

high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country,

but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a

certain level. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many individuals claim that capping maximum income levels is a necessary measure to ensure social equity, while others believe that allowing a minority of citizens to earn exceptionally high salaries brings substantial benefits to the nation. Personally, I firmly agree with the latter view, as financial incentives are the primary driver to stimulate national GDP and retain highly skilled individuals in a competitive market.

On the one hand, I recognize there are compelling reasons why some people argue that governments should restrict salaries above a specific threshold. This can be attributed to the fact that an excessive wealth gap can generate severe social anxiety and psychological pressure among low-income laborers. Consequently, if a small group of individuals accumulates an disproportionate share of national wealth while the majority suffers from financial strain to satisfy basic needs, it may lead to social instability and undermine mutual trust within the community. For instance, in several developing economies, the stark contrast between affluent executives and underprivileged workers has often triggered public dissatisfaction and labor disputes. However, this argument lacks concrete evidence to support the idea that capping salaries is an optimal solution to achieve economic balance. Without the prospect of earning higher wealth, senior professionals and talented entrepreneurs will inevitably lose their motivation to work hard, handle an intensive workload, and make meaningful contributions to their companies.

On the other hand, the foundation for my belief is that allowing unlimited high income is an indispensable mechanism to drive innovation and national prosperity. This is because when corporations offer lucrative compensation packages, they can successfully recruit and retain exceptional experts who possess the capacity to solve complex organizational difficulties and pioneer breakthrough solutions. As a result, these high-earning individuals not only upgrade corporate facilities but also generate massive tax revenue for the government, which can be redirected into public healthcare and educational reform. For example, in competitive fields such as information technology or finance in Vietnam, many top-tier software architects and directors receive exceptionally high salaries due to their outstanding expertise. Their high income is the optimal way to inspire the younger generation to cultivate skills and pursue academic excellence. Therefore, wealth concentration among a capable minority serves as a catalyst to boost profits for enterprises and enhance the national economy.

In conclusion, although salary disparity might generate certain psychological strain and social concerns, I strongly believe that capping income is a detrimental policy that hinders national progress. Embracing financial incentives for exceptional talent not only rewards genuine expertise but also contributes to building a reliable, prosperous, and stable society.

Task 2: Some countries have introduced a law to limit working

hours for employees. Why was this law introduced? Do you think it

is a positive or negative development?

Many nations have enacted legislation to impose a ceiling on the number of working hours for staff. From my perspective, this policy reform was primarily introduced to mitigate severe health issues among the workforce, and I firmly believe that this is a highly positive development as it can foster a healthier and more productive labor market.

The enforcement of a law limiting working hours can be attributed to the urgent need to protect employees' physical and mental well-being from burnout. This is because in modern society, driven by intense corporate competition and financial incentives, many businesses tend to demand their staff to handle an excessive workload over an extended period. Consequently, when workers are consistently deprived of sufficient time to relax and recover, they are highly susceptible to chronic stress, anxiety, and severe physical illnesses like cardiovascular diseases. For instance, the authorities in several developed nations, such as Japan, previously witnessed a tragic surge in Karoshi—a phenomenon referring to sudden death from overworking—which forced the government to introduce strict statutory limits on overtime to shield citizens from lethal occupational hazards.

I firmly campaign for the view that this legal restriction represents a positive development since it can optimize workplace productivity. This is due to the fact that when workers are granted a reasonable working schedule, they can allocate a block of time to satisfy their personal needs and engage in regular physical exercise, which directly enhances their self-esteem and energy levels. As a result, when returning to work with a rejuvenated mind, employees can operate with higher precision and creativity, leading to improved overall corporate revenue and national economic growth. For example, many forward-thinking enterprises in Vietnam have actively complied with government labor codes regarding restricted hours, which has enabled their workforce to maintain an optimal work-life balance and significantly boosted long-term performance. Therefore, this legal framework is an optimal way to foster long-term social stability.

In conclusion, the primary reason behind introducing a cap on working hours is to protect employees from dangerous physical and psychological strain. I strongly believe this trend is an advantageous milestone because it not only safeguards the workforce’s health but also drives corporate efficiency and economic sustainability.