Interpreting and Discussing Research Findings in Medical Science - Part 2 Notes

Interpreting and Discussing Research Findings in Medical Science - Part 2

Importance of Discussion

William Lawrence Bragg's quote emphasizes the importance of discovering new ways of thinking about facts, not just obtaining them.

Course Instructor Information

  • Name: (Left Blank)

  • College: (Left Blank)

  • Extension: (Left Blank)

  • Email: (Left Blank)

  • Office No: (Left Blank)

  • Building: (Left Blank)

Contacting the Instructor

  • Location of the office (Building, Floor, Office Number) - all blank.

  • E-mail: (Left Blank)

  • WhatsApp: Via the Section Leader

Specific Learning Outcomes

By the end of this session, students should be able to outline the key components and stages involved in discussing scientific research.

What is a Discussion?

A discussion is an accurate reflection of the results in light of related literature.

Purpose of the Discussion Section

The discussion section is where authors interpret and analyse their research findings within the context of existing literature and theoretical frameworks.

Why Write the Discussion Section?

  1. To interpret the results within the context of existing research.

  2. To highlight the significance of findings and their practical implications.

  3. To propose future research directions based on insights gained.

Continued Purposes of the Discussion Section:

  1. Interpretation of Results:

    • Authors explain the significance of their findings, explaining how they contribute to the field and what they reveal about the research question.

  2. Contextualization:

    • The results are situated within the broader context of existing research.

    • Authors compare their findings with those of previous studies, highlighting agreements, discrepancies, or novel insights.

  3. Implications:

    • The discussion addresses the practical and theoretical implications of the findings.

    • This includes suggestions for how the results can inform practice, policy, or further research.

  4. Limitations:

    • Authors acknowledge the limitations of their study.

    • Discuss potential biases, shortcomings in methodology, and other factors that may affect the interpretation and generalizability of the results.

  5. Future Directions:

    • This section typically concludes with suggestions for future research indicating how subsequent studies can build on the findings and address any identified limitations.

    • Overall, the discussion section synthesizes the main findings of the study and reflects on their meaning within the broader scientific discourse.

How To Write A Discussion Section Of A Research Paper

Key Elements:

  • Summary of Key Findings: Briefly recap the main results as they relate to the research question.

  • Interpretation: Explain findings, emphasizing their contributions to the field.

  • Comparison with Previous Research: Discuss similarities and discrepancies with existing literature.

Structure of Writing the Discussion Section

  • Start Broad: Begin with a general statement about the study's significance and contribution to the field.

  • Middle Section: Explore specific findings; discuss any unexpected results and their relevance.

  • End with Conclusions: Present broader implications, applications, and suggestions for future research studies.

Tips for Clarity

  • Use clear and straightforward language to avoid jargon.

  • Be concise yet thorough in discussing implications and limitations.

  • Consider organizing larger discussions into subsections for better clarity.

Writing the Discussion Section

Key Points:

  • Remind reader of aims.

  • Provide a tentative answer to the hypothesis/research question.

  • Explain findings: Provide support for the proposed answer.

  • Present strengths of approach/justification and outline limitations.

  • Restate findings and wrap up.

Steps for Writing

  1. Summarize the Main Findings

    • Restate your research question when you commence this section.

    • Avoid repetition of the results section.

    • Do not add new ideas generated from the data to this section.

    • Be clear as to how the research findings have addressed the research question.

  2. Summarize the Quality of the Research

    • Be confident about the points made

    • Remember the investigators are the most qualified persons to make assertions about practice and further research if they are justified.

  3. Refer to Related Literature to Set the Study in Context

    • Demonstrate the link between the findings and related literature

    • There is no need to critique the research referred to/mentioned in the discussion

  4. Identify the Study Limitations

    • Discuss any unanswered questions.

    • Give recommendations for future research.