Metabolism and Scaling

Hydration

-          Maintained homeostatically within a safety zone by compensating water loss with input from metabolic, food and drinking water

-          Reptiles are greatly impacted by water availability

-          Cwl and rwl largely driven by body size (ie. Surface area to volume ratio)

-          Skin resistance to evaporation (rs)

-          Tewl seemingly scales with the 0.6 to 0.7 regression in body mass

-          Rwl generally smaller than cwl in dmall sized species and increases faster with body mass (3/4th allometric scaling)

-          Tewl no clear altitudinal cline

Scaling

-          Metabolic

o   Mst: a collection of ideas that connects the physiological processes of individual organisms with the larger patterns or ecology

o   Power law relationship: relationship between MR and body size is a power law with an exponent less than 1 (mouse has higher MR than elephant relative to its mass)

o   Orgasnims size, temp, and mr affect MST

o   Compensation hypothesis: (allocation hypothesis) fitness advantage of lower bmr or smr as a result of lower maintence cost = more allocation to reproductive costs

§  Higher bmr = larger organs = larger reproductive tield (increase intake hypothesis)

o   Important to measure oerformance as fitness and how it covaries with mr through ontogeny

o   Quantitative genetics as a way to understand inheritance and evolution of traits including responses to selection

§  Population level phenotypic variation of quantitative traits into heritable and nonheritable components an links them to fitness via measures of selection

§  Breeders equation: predicts amount of change in a single trait from  one gen to the next R=H2s (heritability and selection)

§  Quantitative trait: trait the may be influenced by multiple genes, continuous variation in a population

§  Provides framework to understand how natural selection can change phenotypic traits over time

§  Predict population level response to univariate and multivariate selection

·       Random trait pre sewlection, look at direction of selection with fitness on y and trait on x, determine where the majority of population will be post selection

·       Multivariate is a quadratic formula and makes the trait appear linear (look at p3 in understanding variation in mr)

·       Types of selective pressures

o   Stabilizing, disruptive, directional, correlational(?) (form of nonlinear multivariate selection where a combo of two or more traits interact non-additaively to affect fitness)

o    

§  Usually use fitness proxies instead of fitness but this can be misleading

·       But fitness proxies are dependent on species life history

§  Total phenotypic variance of a trait = sum of variances attributable to genetic and environmental influences

·       Subdivided into three categorie:

o   Additive: deviations from mean phenotype attributed to additive contribution of particular alleles

o   Dominance- non additive:: quantifies interactions between allèles (dominant)

o   Interaction – non-additive: quantifies interactions between allèles (epistasis : genetic phenomenon that occurs when effect of a genen mutation is dependent on other gene mutation)

-          Heritability studies of MR suggest that it is free to evolve under selection (particularly in endotherms)

o   i.e. selection of bmr in lab mice suited for particular environment

-          consider multiple traits and how they effect mr to get a better understanding of evolutionary shift in mr (running speed may increase but heretibility decreases = cancel eachother out)

-          mr measured as rate of heat production by direct calorimeyty or by co2 or o2 consumption / production

-          bmr associated with internal organs

-          Msum with muscles

o   These two traits are somewhat capable of evolving independently

-          Metabolic theory of ecology: assumes body size and temp independent multiplicative effects on mR (3/4th)

-          Many other factors affect mr so this scaling theory does not hold true

-          Metabolic Rate = R = aM^b

o   A = scaling coefficient

o   M = mass

o   B = scaling exponenet

-          Metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis: how etabolic rate relateds to body mass depends on intensity of R or its metabolic level which is a measure of the elevation of metabolic scaling relationship

o   Metabolic level depends on intensity of various sources (i.e. reproduction, thermoregulation)

o   When metabolic level of RMR is high, sa-related metabolic waste removal predominates and makes b approach 2/3rds

o   When not high b approaches 1

o   Overall predicts concave upwards relationship in endotherms

-          Contextual multimodal theory : sa related fluxes of resources (heat ), physical constraints of internal resource transport on resource supply, body comp, and various processes effecting demand

o   Cell size (during ontogeny should be around 2/3rds)

o   Cell number (near 1)

o   If both = between 2/3 and 1

o   Genome size?

o   May change with life stage and shifts in relative tissue masses and organ masses

-          Extrinsic factors:

o   Temperature

§  e-E/kT ; E = activation energy, k is boltsmanns constant, T is temp in K

o   salinity, pH, latitude, altitude, o2 supply food supply, environmental toxins , organismal plasticity, stressors

-          Interactions:

o   Non moving ectotherms:

§  B may decrease with increasing T (bc of high SA related mr processes)

o   Moving ectotherms:

§  B may increase with increasing T

§  B increases with cold exposure (opposite in endothermic birds)

o   Cooler lat and alt = higher b values

o   Cellular changes due to temp = interaction between intrinsic and extrinsic factors

o   SA/V ratio (xeric = higher b)

o   Life history stage

-          Aquatic ectotherms evolved adaptations that enable them to avoid oxygen shortages as size and temperature increase

o   i.e. reduction in growth rate

-          how does temp and locomotor activity effect metabolic scaling (b) in air vs water breathers

o   1) b increases more steeply with activity level in airbreathers due to v related musculature properties (water breathers countered be pressures to reduce oxygen consumption

o   2) b increases more steeply with warming in water breathers

o   The find that b decreases with increased temp in only water breathers and b overall increases with activity in airbreathers

-          Ghost of oxygen limitation past: warming contributes to b decrease in water breathers as expected from an evolved avoidance of oxygen limitation at large sizes

-           

-