Conformity, Nonconformity, and Theories of Deviance

Conformity and Nonconformity

  • Conformity: Acting or thinking differently in a group situation compared to being alone.
    • Forms of Conformity:
    • Compliance: Adjusting behavior in response to a direct request.
    • Obedience: Following explicit instructions from an authority figure.
    • Acceptance: Internalizing others' opinions or behaviors as one's own.

Reasons for Conformity

  • Normative Conformity: Conforming to fit in with others or to be liked.
  • Informational Conformity: Conforming due to a lack of information, or when unsure what to do.

Classic Studies of Conformity

  • Sherif's Auto-Kinetic Experiments (Muzafer Sherif, 1935):
    • Examines the formation of social norms through ambiguous stimuli.
  • Asch’s Conformity Experiments (Solomon Asch, 1950s):
    • Explores how peer influence shapes individual opinions.

Understanding Deviance

  • Anomie Theory (Robert Merton):
    • Describes a state of normlessness in society.
    • Issues arise when culturally defined goals and means are unattainable, resulting in strain.
Types of Responses to Anomie
  • Innovation: Accept goals, reject means (e.g., seeking quick success, like winning the lottery).
  • Ritualism: Reject goals, accept means (e.g., going through the motions).
  • Retreatism: Reject both goals and means (e.g., substance abuse).
  • Rebellion: Reject existing goals and means while promoting new ones.

Theories of Deviance

  • Control Theory: Social control mechanisms and the strength of social ties help maintain conformity.

  • Social Bonds Theory (Travis Hirschi): Our connections impact the likelihood of deviant behavior based on:

    • Attachment: Emotional bonds to others.
    • Commitment: Investment in societal goals.
    • Involvement: Participation in conventional activities.
    • Belief: Acceptance of social rules and norms.
  • Differential Association Theory (Edwin Sutherland):

    • Criminal behavior is learned from primary groups through social interaction.
  • Differential Identification Theory (Glaser):

    • Highlights learning from non-significant others instead of just primary groups.

Labelling Theory

  • Grounded in Symbolic Interactionism (Howard Becker):
    • Focuses on societal reactions to deviance instead of the deviant act itself.
    • Emphasizes that the definition of deviance is in the eye of the beholder.

Primary and Secondary Deviance

  • Primary Deviance: Initial act of violation.
  • Secondary Deviance: Internalization of a deviant identity due to repeated behavior or social labeling.
Techniques of Neutralization
  • Denial of responsibility: Avoiding accountability for actions.
  • Denial of injury: Claiming no harm was done.
  • Denial of victim: Arguing that the victim deserved the consequence.
  • Condemning the condemners: Misdirection of blame to the accuser.
  • Appeal to a higher loyalty: Prioritizing allegiance to a group over societal norms.

Reactions to Deviance

  • Informal Labelling: Social penalties for broken informal rules (e.g., cheating in relationships).
  • Formal Labelling: Institutional reactions that can carry stigma, often resulting in documentation and potential lifelong repercussions.

Societal Benefits and Drawbacks of Formal Labelling

  • Benefits:

    • Provides clear points of reference for consequences.
    • Can serve as scapegoats to alleviate societal tension (e.g., political scapegoating).
    • Promotes community and solidarity around shared challenges.
  • Drawbacks:

    • Labels can overshadow individual identity (e.g., children diagnosed as ‘problematic’).
    • Risk of self-fulfilling prophecies (e.g., stigmatization of children with learning disabilities).
    • Potential for over-medication and dependency on labels for societal acceptance (e.g., ADHD treatments).